3
Steps to Get a Perfectly Written Assignment
One
Click “order this assignment now”
Two
Choose your deadline & pay for it
Three
Get custom-written work ready for submission

Custom-Written, AI & Plagiarism-Free with Passing "Guaranteed"

money back guarantee
Recent Papers 03-26-2022

Assess own organisation’s ability to translate vision, mission and strategic goals into operational objectives with realistic and measurable targets

MARK SHEET – MANAGING FOR EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS

Centre Number :

 

Centre Name :

 

 

Learner Registration No :

 

Learner Name:

 

 

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ASSESSMENT AND USE OF MARK SHEET

Assessment must be conducted with reference to the assessment criteria (AC). In order to pass the unit, every AC must be met.

Assessors will normally award marks for every AC and then total them into a percentage. However, for greater simplicity, there is the option to not use marks at all and merely indicate with a ‘Pass’ or ‘Referral’ in the box (below right). In order to pass the unit every AC must receive a ‘Pass’

Where marks are awarded according to the degree to which the learner’s evidence in the submission meets each AC, every AC must be met, i.e. receive at least half marks (e.g. min 10/20). Any AC awarded less than the minimum produces an automatic referral for the submission (regardless of the overall mark achieved).

Sufficiency descriptors are provided as guidance. If 20 marks are available for an AC and the evidence in the submission approximates to the ‘pass’ descriptor, that indicates it should attract 10 marks out of 20, if a ‘good pass’ then ca. 15 out of 20. The descriptors are not comprehensive, and cannot be, as there are many ways in which a submission can exceed or fall short of the requirements. Assess own organisation’s ability to translate vision, mission and strategic goals into operational objectives with realistic and measurable targets

 

  1. Learner named above confirms authenticity of submission.
  2. ILM uses learners’ submissions – on an anonymous basis – for assessment standardisation. By submitting, I agree that ILM may use this script on condition that all information which may identify me is removed.
  3. However, if you are unwilling to allow ILM use your script, please refuse by ticking the box:

 

 

Learning Outcome / Section 1: Be able to assess the organisation’s ability to manage efficiently and effectively to achieve targets and objectives

 

Assessment Criteria (AC)

Sufficiency Descriptors

[Typical standard that , if replicated across the whole submission, would produce a referral, borderline pass or good pass result]

Assessor feedback on AC

[comments not necessary in every box]

 

AC 1.1

Assess own organisation’s ability to translate vision, mission and strategic goals into operational objectives with realistic and measurable targets

Referral [ca. 5/20]

Pass [10/20]

Good Pass [ca. 15/20]

 

 
  • Own organisation’s ability to translate vision, mission and strategic goals into operational objectives with realistic and measurable targets is not assessed, and/or own organisation’s ability to efficiently and effectively delegate responsibilities for the achievement of targets and objectives is not assessed
  • How the organisation translates vision, mission and strategic goals into operational objectives is merely described with no assessment to make a judgement as to level of ability
  • How the organisation translates vision, mission and strategic goals into operational objectives is assessed and a judgement made as to level of ability, although the criteria used for making the judgement may be limited or subjective
  • How the organisation translates vision, mission and strategic goals into operational objectives is assessed and a judgement made as to level of ability using a wide range of objective criteria
     

 

/ 20

(min. of 10)

 

Pass or Referral

 

 

Referral [ca. 5/20]

Pass [10/20]

Good Pass [ca. 15/20]

 

 
                   

 

 

AC 1.2

Assess own organisation’s ability to efficiently and effectively delegate responsibilities for the achievement of targets and objectives

  • How own organisation delegates responsibilities for the achievement of targets and objectives is merely described with no assessment to make a judgement as to efficiency or effectiveness
  • How own organisation delegates responsibilities for the achievement of targets and objectives is assessed and a judgement made as to level of ability, although the criteria used for making the judgement may be limited or subjective
  • How own organisation delegates responsibilities for the achievement of targets and objectives is assessed and a judgement made as to level of ability using a range of objective criteria
   

 

 

/ 20

(min. of 10)

 

Pass or Referral

 

AC 1.3

Assess the efficiency and effectiveness of control methods used to monitor the achievement of targets and objectives in own area of responsibility

Referral [ca. 5/20]

Pass [10/20]

Good Pass [ca. 15/20]

 

 
  • Control methods used to monitor the achievement of targets and objectives in own area of responsibility are merely described with no assessment to make a judgement as to efficiency or effectiveness
  • Control methods used to monitor the achievement of targets and objectives in own area of responsibility are assessed and a judgement made as to efficiency and effectiveness, although the criteria used for making the judgement may be limited or subjective
  • Control methods used to monitor the achievement of targets and objectives in own area of responsibility are assessed and a judgement made as to efficiency and effectiveness and a judgement made as to level of ability using a range of objective criteria
     

 

/ 20

(min. of 10)

 

Pass or Referral

 

AC 1.4

Implement improvements to organisational efficiency and effectiveness in own area of responsibility

Referral [ca. 3/12]

Pass [6/12]

Good Pass [ca. 9/12]

 

 
  • There is no implicit or explicit evidence that improvements to organisational efficiency and effectiveness in own area of responsibility are implemented, or are being implemented
  • Implicit or limited explicit evidence is provided that improvements to organisational efficiency and effectiveness in own area of responsibility are implemented, or are being implemented
  • A range of explicit evidence is provided that improvements to organisational efficiency and effectiveness in own area of responsibility are implemented, or are being implemented
     

 

/ 12

(min. of 6)

 

Pass or Referral

 

Section comments (optional):

Verification comments (optional):

 

Learning Outcome / Section 2: Be able to evaluate own ability to manage efficiently and effectively

 

Assessment Criteria (AC)

Sufficiency Descriptors

[Typical standard that , if replicated across the whole submission, would produce a referral, borderline pass or good pass result]

Assessor feedback on AC

[comments not necessary in every box]

 

AC 2.1

Evaluate own ability to manage effectively and efficiently

Referral [ca. 4/16]

Pass [8/16]

Good Pass [ca. 12/16]

 

 
  • Own ability to manage effectively and efficiently is not evaluated
  • Own ability to manage effectively and efficiently is Own ability to manage effectively and efficiently is
     
             

 

 

  • Own ability to manage is merely described with no evaluation using appropriate criteria or feedback from others to provide recommendations for improving effectiveness and efficiency

evaluated to provide recommendations for improving effectiveness and efficiency, although the criteria or feedback from others used may be limited or subjective

evaluated using a range of objective criteria and feedback from others to provide recommendations for improving effectiveness and efficiency Assess own organisation’s ability to translate vision, mission and strategic goals into operational objectives with realistic and measurable targets

 

 

/ 16

(min. of 8)

 

Pass or Referral

 

AC 2.2

Implement changes in own management style in order to manage more efficiently and effectively

Referral [ca. 3/12]

Pass [6/12]

Good Pass [ca. 9/12]

 

 
  • There is no implicit or explicit evidence that changes in own management style are, or are being, implemented, or the changes in own management style are not focused on effectiveness and efficiency or the evaluation
  • Implicit or limited explicit evidence is provided that changes in own management style focused on effectiveness and efficiency and based on the evaluation are, or are being, implemented
    • A range of explicit evidence is provided that changes in own management style focused on effectiveness and efficiency and based on the evaluation are, or are being, implemented
     

 

/ 12

(min. of 6)

 

Pass or Referral

 

Section comments (optional):

Verification comments (optional):

 

 

/ 100

 

TOTAL MARKS

 

Assessor’s Decision

Quality Assurance Use

 

Outcome (delete as applicable): PASS / REFERRAL

Signature of Assessor 

Date of QA Check:

Outcome (delete as applicable): PASS / REFERRAL

Signature of QA:

Date of QA check:

 
                     

 

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions

Our Giveaways

Plagiarism Report

for £20 Free

Formatting

for £12 Free

Title page

for £10 Free

Bibliography

for £18 Free

Outline

for £9 Free

Limitless Amendments

for £14 Free

Get all these features for
£83.00 FREE

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

Have a look at our samples which are written by our professional writers to give you an insight into how your work is going to look like. We have added some essays, coursework, assignments as well as dissertations.

View Our Samples

Oct Thu 2024

Poster Presentation | Poster Making Assi

Best Help for Creating High-Quality Poster Presentations Creating a best poster...

Oct Wed 2024

Produce and present a poster that demons

XGBCYP5202 Person Centered Care and Integrated Working – Component...

Oct Wed 2024

Analyse the range of factors that may in

 Promoting Individuals’ Health and Wellbeing for Leaders of Adult Soc...