Examine and investigate the strategic and operational importance of change for Miss Macaroon.
MG630 Change and Organisational Development
|
Module code and title: |
MG630 Change and Organisational Development |
Module leader: |
|
|
Assignment No. and type: |
PR1: 10 Minute Individual Presentation + 5 minutes for questions |
Assessment weighting: |
40% |
|
Submission time and date: |
Presentation: During Class Time PPT slides to be submitted on BB before 2 pm on Friday 4 April 2025 |
Target feedback time and date: |
3 Weeks |
|
Assignment task |
|
CONTEXT Miss Macaroon is a niche bakery business based in Birmingham, specializing in high-end macaroons. The business was founded by Rosie Ginday, a trained pastry chef with a strong passion for social entrepreneurship. Miss Macaroon operates as a social enterprise, with profits reinvested to support training and employment opportunities for unemployed young people, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Over the past three years, Miss Macaroon has expanded its operations by opening pop-up kiosks in major shopping centres across the West Midlands, alongside its flagship shop in Birmingham. The business now operates four outlets and plans to expand to eight within the next two years. As part of its growth strategy, Miss Macaroon is planning to launch an online customization service for macaroons, allowing customers to design bespoke gifts for nationwide delivery. This service will be supported by an investment in a dedicated e-commerce platform and new packaging facilities at its Birmingham headquarters. The planned expansion and introduction of the online customization service will lead to restructuring within Miss Macaroon. Proposed changes include:
Currently, each kiosk has a store manager and a small team of customer service assistants. Under the new structure, smaller kiosks will be managed by production staff, who will also take on some managerial responsibilities. The flagship shop in Birmingham will continue to have a dedicated store manager and expanded customer service team to handle high foot traffic. While the proposed restructuring aims to streamline operations and support growth, it has caused concerns among current employees. Many staff members feel that the reasons for the changes and their implications have not been clearly explained. This has led to feelings of uncertainty, reduced morale, and a loss of trust in senior management. Rosie Ginday believes that regular team meetings and newsletters have adequately communicated the rationale and benefits of the proposed changes. However, feedback from staff suggests otherwise, with several employees voicing frustration over the lack of consultation and clarity about their future roles. In addition to managing these internal challenges, Miss Macaroon faces significant upfront costs associated with its expansion plans, including:
Some long-serving employees who joined Miss Macaroon in its early days are resistant to changes in their roles, citing discomfort with new responsibilities. Rosie is committed to ensuring the success of the expansion while addressing these employee concerns. To this end, she has engaged your consultancy to help manage the restructuring process and ensure a smooth transition as the company continues to grow. |
|
|
|
This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes: |
|
LO 1: Understand the strategic and operational importance of change in organisations |
|
LO 2: Critically evaluate change management theory, strategies and tactical options including organisation development |
|
|
|
Task requirements |
|
You have been hired by Miss Macaroon to provide insights into how the business can navigate the VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, Ambiguity) environment it operates in. Before Miss Macaroon commissions a detailed report (CW1), they require a presentation on how change management strategies can assist them and what tactical options are available to ensure resilience and growth during challenging times. You are to:
Presentation Requirements: Group or Individual Work:
Presentation Schedule:
Time Allocation:
Participation:
Presentation Format:
Groupwork Log:
Presentation Skills:
Recording Requirement:
|
|
|
|
Referencing and research requirements |
|
Please reference your work according to the Harvard style as defined in Cite Them Right Online (http://www.citethemrightonline.com). This information is also available in book form: Pears, R. and Shields, G. (2019) Cite them right: the essential reference guide. 11th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Copies are available via the University library. Minimum requirements: 10 references Mixed academically credible sources for example: Core Textbooks, Journals, News Articles, Professional Bodies, Professional and Credible Videos, Professional and Credible Podcasts References older than 10 years must be supported by a more recent reference. |
|
|
|
How your work will be assessed |
|
Your work will be assessed against the assessment criteria which have been provided at the end of this brief. As this is a group report, a record of individual contribution must be submitted as part of the assignment for all members of the group which details the role played in the creation of the assignment and includes a record of all communications engaged with. These criteria have been designed specifically for this assignment and are intended to measure the extent to which you have demonstrated your achievement of its associated learning outcomes (see above). They have been aligned with the institutional grade descriptor appropriate for your level. The assessment criteria provide a basis for fair and consistent marking and indicate what is expected of you in this assignment. It is strongly recommended that you engage with them while you are working on the assignment and use them in combination with any feedback you receive once your work has been marked to help you plan for future learning and development. |
|
|
|
Submission details |
|
|
Before you submit |
|
|
Fit to Submit: Assignment Checklist |
|
This brief assignment checklist is designed to help you avoid some of the most common mistakes students make in their coursework. Have you read the assignment brief? If not, do so now! In it you will find details of the assessment task, word count, the assessment criteria your work is marked against, and the learning outcomes – the basis for the assessment strategy in each module. Students often lose marks by forgetting some of the more straightforward elements of their assignments. We recommend that you “tick off” each of the points below as you prepare your work for submission. If you need any help, ask your tutor and/or visit https://bucks.ac.uk/students/academicadvice/assessment-and-examination Have you read and understood the assessment criteria? Have you met the learning outcomes? You will lose marks and your work may even be failed if you have not. Have you demonstrated you can think and write critically in the completed work? This means you have supported your arguments/explanations appropriately e.g. using relevant academic sources and you have offered discussion points which extends your own or others’ viewpoints to make reasoned conclusions/judgements. Have you maintained an appropriate tone throughout your work? Is your work formal, focused, developed and clear? Have you checked that the referencing in your assignment is in line with your programme requirements? Have you proof-read your work and used spellcheck software to check your spelling and grammar? Have you checked the presentation of your work is as specified by your tutor, for example, are font size, colour, style, line spacing and margins as the tutor specified? Have you kept to the word count (or equivalent)? If you are not sure, check with your tutor. Can you confirm that the work submitted is your own and maintains academic integrity? |
|
|
Fail |
Fail |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
|
|
0-34 (F) – Fail |
35-39 E – Marginal fail |
40-49 (D)
|
50-59 (C)
|
60-69 (B)
|
70-79 (A)
|
80-100 (A+)
|
|
|
Not successful |
Below required standard |
Satisfactory |
Good |
Very Good |
Excellent |
Outstanding |
|
Knowledge and understanding 30%
|
The work demonstrates a limited and/or substantially inaccurate or no understanding of key aspects of what constitutes a VUCA environment and how and where STL sits within it. Examples of coherent and detailed knowledge around change and organisational development is missing. No consideration given to the importance of corporate strategy and/or tactical options available to STL. Recent research is missing to support work. |
The work demonstrates insufficient understanding of key aspects of a VUCA environment and how and where STL sits within it. Some coherent and detailed knowledge around change and organisational development. Passing consideration given to the importance of corporate strategy and/or tactical options available to STL. Recent research is limited to support work. |
The work demonstrates a basic yet systematic understanding of key aspects of a VUCA environment and how and where STL sits within it. Some coherent and detailed knowledge around change and organisational development with links to the importance of corporate strategy and/or tactical options available to STL. There is limited engagement with recent research to support work. |
The work demonstrates a sound breadth and depth of systematic understanding of a VUCA environment and how and where STL sits within it. There is some coherent and detailed links with change and organisational development, as well as the impact these have on corporate strategy and/or tactical options available to STL. There is good engagement with recent research from a limited range of sources to support work. |
The work demonstrates a sophisticated and critical systematic understanding of a VUCA environment and how and where STL sits within it. There are coherent and detailed links with change and organisational development. The impact on corporate strategy and/or tactical options available to STL well documented and supported overall by very good engagement with recent research from a good range of sources to support work. |
The work demonstrates a highly accomplished systematic understanding of a VUCA environment and how and where STL sits within it. Excellent identification of change and organisational development, and demonstration of its impact on corporate strategy and/or tactical options available to STL, beyond what has been taught. The supported overall by very good engagement knowledge is supported by recent research from an excellent range of sources to support work. |
The work demonstrates an exceptional systematic understanding of key aspects of a VUCA environment and how and STL sits within it. Outstanding identification of change and organisational development, and its impact on corporate strategy and/or tactical options available to STL. The work is coherent and detailed, demonstrating knowledge well beyond what has been taught, all of which is informed by recent research from an excellent range of sources to support work. |
|
Analysis and criticality 30%
|
The work demonstrates a limited or no ability of analysis and enquiry. Conceptual understanding of change management is limited thus the work does not:
|
The work demonstrates an insufficient ability of analysis and enquiry. Conceptual understanding of change management is evident and enables the work to partially demonstrate:
There is a limited range of independently selected relevant and appropriate scholarly sources. |
The work demonstrates asufficient analysis and enquiry. A basic yet sufficient Conceptual understanding of change management is evident that enables the work to demonstrate: • use of theory and corporate models to devise and sustain arguments and solve problems in relation to how corporate strategy and/or tactical options available to are affected by the current VUCA environment. • the ability to describe and comment upon aspects of current research and scholarship, with a sufficient appreciation of the uncertainty, ambiguity, and limits of knowledge; • use a sufficient range of independently selected relevant and appropriate scholarly sources. |
The work demonstrates a sound ability of analysis and enquiry. A sound conceptual understanding of change management is evident that enables the work to demonstrate: • use of theory and corporate models to devise and sustain arguments and solve problems, in relation to how corporate strategy and/or tactical options available to STL are affected by the current VUCA environment. • the ability to describe and comment upon aspects of current research and scholarship, with a sound appreciation of the uncertainty, ambiguity, and limits of knowledge; • use of a sound range of independently selected relevant and appropriate scholarly sources. |
The work demonstrates a sophisticated ability of analysis. A sophisticated conceptual understanding of change management is evident that enables the work to demonstrate: • use of theory and corporate models to devise and sustain arguments and solve problems, in relation to how corporate strategy and/or tactical options available to STL are affected by the current VUCA environment. • the ability to describe, synthesise and critique aspects of current research and scholarship, with a sophisticated appreciation of the uncertainty, ambiguity, and limits of knowledge • use of a sophisticated range of independently selected relevant and appropriate scholarly sources. |
The work demonstrates a highly accomplished ability of analysis and enquiry. A highly accomplished conceptual understanding of change management is evident that enables the work to demonstrate: • use of theory and corporate models to devise and sustain arguments and solve problems, in relation to how corporate strategy and/or tactical options available to STL are affected by the current VUCA environment, and how this has influenced business approaches to planned and unplanned change • the ability to describe, synthesise and critique all relevant aspects of current research and scholarship, with a nuanced appreciation of the uncertainty, ambiguity, and limits of knowledge; • use of a highly accomplished range of independently selected relevant and appropriate scholarly sources. |
The work demonstrates an exceptional ability of analysis and enquiry. A superior conceptual understanding of change management is evident that enables the work to demonstrate: • use of ideas and techniques to devise and sustain arguments and/or solve problems, in relation to how corporate strategy and/or tactical options available to STL are affected by the current VUCA environment, and how this has influenced business approaches to planned and unplanned change • the ability to describe, synthesise and critique all relevant aspects of current research and scholarship, with a highly nuanced appreciation of the uncertainty, ambiguity, and limits of knowledge; • use of a superior range of independently selected relevant and appropriate scholarly sources. |
|
Application and Practice 20%
• Implementation of VUCA strategies in real-world contexts.
|
Work demonstrates a limited or no ability to select appropriate change management theories and corporate models to develop and apply knowledge and understanding in the context of STL’s operational situation. Presentation of research and findings is not clear or effective, or interpretation of information (i.e. statistics) ineffective and/or incomplete. Recommendations are missing. |
Work demonstrates an insufficient ability to select and apply appropriate change management theories and corporate models to develop and apply knowledge and understanding in the context of STL’s operational situation. Presentation of research and findings is often not clear or effective, or only in a limited range of formats, and gathering, processing and interpretation of data ineffective and/or inefficient. Recommendations are inappropriate for STL. |
Work demonstrates a sufficient ability to select and apply appropriate change management theories and corporate models to develop and apply knowledge and understanding in the context of STL’s operational situation. Presents research and findings in several formats, and gathers, processes and interpret data efficiently. Recommendations have been made that are somewhat appropriate but unfocused, not taking into consideration key areas of note identified within the presentation. |
Work demonstrates an ability to select and apply in a consistent and informed manner appropriate change management theories and corporate models to develop and apply knowledge and understanding in the context of STL’s operational situation. Consistently presents research and findings effectively and appropriately, in many formats, and gathers, process and interpret data efficiently and effectively, making good use of the appendices. Recommendations have been made that are appropriate but gives limited consideration to the key areas of note identified within the presentation and no consideration given to the possible implementation challenges of these. |
Work demonstrates an ability to select and apply in a capable and effective manner appropriate change management theories and corporate models to develop and apply knowledge and understanding in the context of STL’s operational situation. Consistently presents thorough research and findings perceptively and appropriately, in a wide range of formats, and gathers, process and interpret a wide range of complex data efficiently and effectively, making very good use of the appendices. Recommendations have been made that are appropriate, take into consideration key areas of note identified within the presentation, and give good consideration to the possible implementation challenges of these. |
Work demonstrates an ability to select and apply in a highly accomplished manner appropriate change management theories and corporate models to develop and apply knowledge and understanding in the context of STL’s operational situation. Consistently presents thorough research and findings perceptively, convincingly, and appropriately, in wide range of formats, and gathers, processes and interpret a wide range of complex data efficiently and effectively, making excellent use of the appendices. Recommendations have been made that are appropriate, take into consideration key areas of note identified within the presentation, and give excellent consideration to the possible implementation challenges of these. Minimal costing considerations have been provided. |
Work demonstrates an ability to select and apply in a highly accomplished and innovative manner appropriate change management theories and corporate models to develop and apply knowledge and understanding in the context of STL’s operational situation. Consistently presents thorough research and findings perceptively authoritatively, and appropriately, in wide range of formats, and gather, process and interpret a wide range of complex data efficiently and effectively, making outstanding use of the appendices. Recommendations have been made that are appropriate, take into consideration key areas of note identified within the presentation, and give excellent consideration to the possible implementation challenges of these. Detailed costing considerations have been provided. |
|
Transferable skills 20% This should include evidence of:
|
Not able to respond to questions, not able to consult any supporting information Overall sloppy presentation on slides, lacking careful spell and grammar checks. Work demonstrates limited or no ability to: -communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions accurately and reliably utilising relevant communication skills (level of written communication) - Present to a professional standard Fewer than 10 appropriate references present and Harvard Referencing system not followed.
|
Some attempt made to respond to questions, but limited understanding shown of the issues. Patchy attention to detail.
Work demonstrates insufficient ability to: -communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions accurately and reliably utilising relevant communication skills (level of written communication) - Presents to a professional standard Fewer than 10 appropriate references present and Harvard Referencing system not followed.
|
Waffle and padding evident, not familiar with the entirety of issues facing the company. More thought needed to be given to clarity of presentation and spell and grammar checks. Work demonstrates a sufficient ability to: -communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions accurately and reliably utilising relevant communication skills (level of written communication) - Present to a professional standard A minimum of 10 appropriate references are present and Harvard Referencing system sometimes followed. |
Some questions handled better than others but some confidence inspired. Slides mostly clear with very few errors
Work demonstrates a Consistent and confident ability to: -communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions accurately and reliably utilising relevant communication skills (level of written communication) - Presents to a professional standard More than 10 appropriate references present and Harvard Referencing system sometimes followed. |
Mostly good question handling, some supporting evidence available to consult, inspired confidence. Clear visuals and carefully spell and grammar checked Work demonstrates a Highly proficient ability to: -communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions accurately and reliably utilising relevant communication skills (level of written communication) - Presents to a professional standard More than 10 appropriate references present and Harvard Referencing system often followed. |
Fluent question handling, drawing on additional supporting information; very familiar with all issues facing the company. Very clear visuals and carefully spell and grammar checked Work demonstrates a Highly accomplished ability to: -communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions accurately and reliably utilising relevant communication skills - Presents to a professional standard More than 10 appropriate references present and Harvard Referencing system always followed. |
Task completed with a high degree of accuracy, coordination, and proficiency. Excellent use of English.. All responses fully backed up with evidence of wider reading and research. Work demonstrates a exceptional ability to: -communicate information, ideas, problems and solutions accurately and reliably utilising relevant communication skills (level of written communication) - Presents to a professional standard More than 10 appropriate references present and Harvard Referencing system always followed. |
What You Must Know About MG630 Change and Organisational Development Assignment
The MG630 Change and Organisational Development module explores the theories, strategies, and practical applications of change management within organisations. It requires students to critically analyse organisational change processes, assess challenges, and evaluate development strategies that enhance business effectiveness.
Key Areas to Focus On
-
Theories of Organisational Change
- Lewin’s Change Management Model (Unfreeze, Change, Refreeze)
- Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model
- McKinsey 7-S Framework
- ADKAR Model (Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, Reinforcement)
Understanding these models helps students explain how change occurs and what organisations must do to manage transitions effectively.
-
Types of Organisational Change
- Transformational Change: Major shifts in structure, strategy, or culture.
- Transactional Change: Smaller, process-driven modifications.
- Planned vs. Emergent Change: Whether change is deliberately implemented or occurs organically in response to external factors.
-
Drivers of Change
- Technological advancements
- Globalisation and competition
- Economic shifts and regulatory requirements
- Employee expectations and workplace culture changes
-
Resistance to Change
- Psychological barriers such as fear and uncertainty
- Structural resistance within organisational systems
- Lack of effective communication
- Strategies to overcome resistance, including leadership approaches and employee engagement
-
Change Implementation Strategies
- Role of leadership in managing change (transformational vs. transactional leadership)
- Importance of communication in reducing resistance
- Employee involvement and participation strategies
- Monitoring and evaluation techniques for successful change execution
Assignment Expectations
- Critical Analysis: The assignment requires more than just describing theories; students must critically analyse their application in real business environments.
- Use of Case Studies: Incorporate real-world examples to demonstrate how organisations have successfully or unsuccessfully managed change.
- Application of Theory to Practice: Link academic theories to organisational contexts by providing well-researched arguments.
- Evaluation of Change Strategies: Compare different approaches to change and justify the most suitable strategy for a given situation.
- Reflection on Challenges: Identify potential pitfalls and suggest ways to mitigate risks in change initiatives.
Structure of the Assignment
-
Introduction
- Overview of organisational change and its importance
- Purpose of the assignment and key areas of discussion
-
Literature Review
- Theoretical frameworks related to change and organisational development
- Discussion of academic research and critical perspectives
-
Case Study Analysis (if required)
- Evaluation of a real-world organisation’s change process
- Lessons learned from successful and unsuccessful change efforts
-
Application of Change Strategies
- Justification of chosen models and frameworks
- How these strategies align with business goals
-
Challenges and Recommendations
- Analysis of resistance factors
- Strategies for managing risks and improving implementation
-
Conclusion
- Summary of key findings
- Final thoughts on managing organisational change effectively
-
References
- Cited using Harvard or APA referencing as per university guidelines


