Order this Assignment Now: £140 VALID THRU: 04-Apr-2025
Critically analyse the determinants of health and the drivers of inequality across populations
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Module name: Inequalities and Social JusticeAcademic year: 2024-25
Assessment period: Trimester 1
Module code
Level
Credit value
Module leader
UNL3006
6
30
Assessment code and title:
AS1
Assessed learning outcomes:
Critically analyse the determinants of health and the drivers of inequality across populations
Apply principles and theoretical perspectives of social justice to analyse and appraise the provision of health and social care across UK populations
E. Communicate and argue information professionally and empathically via written format appropriate for the purpose and topic in the area
Weighting:
50%
Word limit:
3000 words
Where the submission exceeds the stipulated word limit by more than 10%, the submission will only be marked up to and including the additional 10%. Anything over this will not be included in the final grade for the assessment item. Abstracts, bibliographies, reference lists, appendices and footnotes are excluded from any word limit
requirements.
Submission deadline:
Please read this assessment brief in its entirety before starting work on the assessment task.
Assessment Task: A written assignment critiquing the determinants of inequality in a defined population and how the inequality can be redressed
Assessment Guidance: Choose ONE of the following population areas: Write an essay answering the questions below:
People living with HIV/AIDS or other chronic illnesses
People with disabilities
Refugees and asylum seekers
“ What are the specific determinants of inequality/health inequality of your chosen population/community group? What principle of social justice could be used to evaluate the provision of health and social care in your chosen population group? How would the inequality be redressed?”
In your response, please take note of the following guidance
Use a standard essay format of introduction, (300 words) main body (2,400) and conclusion (300 words)
Your essay should demonstrate a clear understanding of the determinants of inequality and their application to your named population/community group.
In your essay, you MUST critically apply the principles and theoretical perspective of social justice to analyse the provisions of health and social care, focused on your target population/community group
Support all discussion with relevant evidence e.g. examples, explanations, data. This should come from a range of additional quality academic sources including the core reading list that are correctly cited and referenced.
Reading Requirement:
Matheson, J. Patterson J and Neilson L. (2020), Tackling Causes and Consequences of Health Inequalities, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis (This is your compulsory text, available on Kortext).
Bartley, M. (2017), Health Inequality: An Introduction to Concepts, Theories and Methods, 2nd ed, Polity. (This is a recommended text)
Learning Outcomes
On successful completion of this assessment, you will be able to:
A. Critically analyse the determinants of health and the drivers of inequality across populations
B. Apply principles and theoretical perspectives of social justice to analyse and appraise the provision of health and social care across UK populations
E. Communicate and argue information professionally and empathically via written format appropriate for the purpose and topic in the area
Academic Integrity and Misconduct
Unless this is a group assessment, the work you produce must be your own, with work taken from any other source properly referenced and attributed. For the avoidance of doubt this means that it is an infringement of academic integrity and, therefore, academic misconduct to ask someone else to carry out all or some of the work for you, whether paid or unpaid, or to use the work of another student whether current or previously submitted.
For further guidance on what constitutes plagiarism, contract cheating or collusion, or any other infringement of academic integrity, please read the University’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy. You will also find useful resources on the VLE: Referencing and Academic Integrity page .
N.B. The penalties for academic misconduct are severe and can include failing the assessment, failing the module and expulsion from the university.
Assessment Submission To submit your work, please go to the Assessments tile on the module page – and submit to Turnitin. Please note that essays and text-based reports should be submitted as Word documents and not PDFs or Mac files.
Written work will be subject to anti-plagiarism detection software. Turnitin checks student work for possible textual matches against internet available resources and its own proprietary database.
N.B Work emailed directly to your tutor will not be marked. Late submission of work
For first sits
Submission within one week of the original deadline – work will be marked and returned with full feedback and awarded a maximum bare pass grade (D-).
Submission more than one week from original deadline – fail grade (LG, L indicating late).
For resits
Extensions
The University of Northampton’s general policy with regard to extensions is to be supportive of students who have genuine difficulties, but not against pressures of work that could have reasonably been anticipated.
For full details please refer to the Extensions Policy . Extensions are only available for first sits – they are not available for resits.
Mitigating Circumstances
For guidance on mitigating circumstances please go to Mitigating Circumstances VLE area where you will find detailed guidance on the policy as well as guidance and the form for making an application.
Please note, however, that an application to defer an assessment on the grounds of mitigating circumstances should normally be made in advance of the submission deadline or examination date.
Marking Rubric
This is what you will be marked against. You need to check it regularly against your work to ensure you are on the right track.
Learning Outcome (LO)
Distinction (A)
Merit (B)
Commended (C)
Pass (D)
Fail (F)
UONL Learning Outcomes – Level 6
Work that is distinguished is of very high quality, with a broad knowledge base and demonstrates a sustained ability to analyse key aspects of the assessment tasks.
Work of commendable quality demonstrating a strong conceptual grasp of assessment tasks in relation to learning outcomes.
Work that is of sound quality, demonstrating a good understanding of learning outcomes which is sufficient and appropriate to the task or activity.
Work of a broadly satisfactory quality demonstrates evidence of achieving the requirements of the learning outcomes.
Work falls short of the threshold standards. Work addresses the assessment task to some extent but overall is limited in its approach and is outweighed by major deficiencies in the work.
LOa) Critically analyse the determinants of health and the drivers of inequality across populations
A distinguished critical analysis. A well-constructed analysis of the determinants of health and drivers of inequality across populations. Excellent specific examples and robust academic evidence are well utilised to support critical analysis.
A commendable analysis that demonstrates a strong grasp of the determinants of health and drivers of inequality across population. Utilises relevant examples to analyse key drivers, good explanation with good quality supporting evidence
Critical analysis of the determinants of health and drivers of inequality across population is evident, although could be further detailed.
Analysis is generally supported by examples and sources of mostly academic quality
Work is predominantly descriptive. There are indications of a satisfactory understanding of the determinants of health and drivers of inequality. Work may contain some irrelevances/inaccuracies/omi ssions
Limited or little evidence of analysis of the determinants of health and drivers of inequality across populations
LOb) Apply principles and theoretical perspectives of social justice to analyse and appraise the provision of health and social care across UK populations
LOe)
Communicate and argue information professionally and empathically via written format appropriate for the purpose and topic in the area
An excellent and original application of principles of social justice which demonstrates a very good grasp of theoretical underpinnings. A wellconstructed appraisal of the provision of health and social care across UK population. High quality supporting academic sources
Excellent evidence of academic and intellectual skills. Clear and concise contents presented.
Distinguished writing style, with cohesive narrative structure and contents.
Competent use of recognised academic conventions including in text citations. Excellent evidence of relevant reading.
A commendable application of principles of social justice which demonstrates a sound grasp of theoretical underpinning perspectives. Strong appraisal of the provision of health and social care across UK population.
Good quality supporting evidence Substantial evidence of academic and intellectual skills. Clear contents presented. Clear writing style, with coherent writing narrative structure and contents. Substantial use of recognised academic conventions including in text citations. Substantial evidence of relevant reading.
A sound application of principles of social justice which demonstrates a good understanding of theoretical perspectives. Good appraisal of the provision of health and social care in the UK. Sufficient quality supporting evidence
Satisfactory evidence of academic and intellectual skills. Satisfactory contents presented.
Narrative structure and contents are primarily coherent, with occasional errors. Satisfactory use of recognised academic conventions including intext citations. Limited number of references used
Work is of satisfactory quality. There is evidence of the application of the principles of social justice. Appraisal of the provision of health and social care in the UK is mainly descriptive.
Basic evidence of academic and intellectual skills. Basic contents presented. Some errors in coherence of sentence structure. Use of scholarly conventions inconsistent. Limited use of relevant references.
Limited evidence of the application of principles of social justice. Work does not meet the required standard.
Limited evidence of academic and intellectual skills. Limited contents presented. Major problem with structure/accuracy in expression, and disorganised academic structure presented.
Little evidence of use of scholarly conventions. Very limited use of relevant references.
Sample Answer - Plagiarised Critically analyse the determinants of health and the drivers of inequality across populations Write an essay answering the questions below:
People living with HIV/AIDS or other chronic illnesses People with disabilities Refugees and asylum seekers
“What are the specific determinants of inequality/health inequality of your chosen population/community group? What principle of social justice could be used to evaluate the provision of health and social care in your chosen population group? How would the inequality be redressed?”
Health inequalities are pervasive in various population groups, exacerbated by social, economic, and political factors. Among these vulnerable groups, people living with HIV/AIDS, people with disabilities, and refugees and asylum seekers face significant barriers to accessing health and social care. These barriers not only affect their physical and mental well-being but also highlight the systemic inequalities embedded within health systems globally. This essay will critically analyse the determinants of health and drivers of inequality affecting these groups and discuss how principles of social justice can evaluate and redress these inequalities.
Determinants of Health Inequality
People Living with HIV/AIDS
People living with HIV/AIDS face several unique challenges that influence health inequality, including stigma, socioeconomic disadvantage, and access to care. One significant determinant of inequality for this group is discrimination and stigma . HIV-related stigma remains a major barrier to accessing appropriate healthcare services, as individuals fear social exclusion or loss of employment. This marginalisation often results in delayed diagnosis, inadequate treatment, and poorer health outcomes.
Additionally, economic disadvantage disproportionately affects people living with HIV. They often face higher healthcare costs due to the lifelong need for antiretroviral therapy (ART) and regular medical check-ups. Lower-income individuals, particularly in developing countries, struggle to afford this treatment, exacerbating health disparities within this population.
People with Disabilities
People with disabilities encounter numerous health inequalities resulting from structural barriers within the healthcare system. These include inadequate access to health services, physical inaccessibility to healthcare facilities, and limited communication options for people with sensory disabilities. The lack of appropriate and inclusive healthcare infrastructure further marginalises individuals with disabilities, leading to poorer health outcomes compared to the general population.
Moreover, social exclusion and prejudice remain significant determinants of health inequality. People with disabilities are often overlooked in health policies and programmes, contributing to unequal access to care. This exclusion extends beyond healthcare to employment, education, and social participation, which further compounds their vulnerability and exacerbates the disparities they face in health and well-being.
Refugees and Asylum Seekers
Refugees and asylum seekers face a multitude of health inequalities driven by legal, social, and economic factors . The legal status of these individuals often restricts their access to healthcare services, leaving many without the right to regular medical care.
Continued...
Order this Assignment Now:£140
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions
