|
you have compared different approaches that could be adopted.
|
critical insight where you have not compared different approaches that could be adopted.
|
approaches that could be adopted. However, there are very limited (if any) considerations made for methodological considerations and/or gaps in the knowledge base.
|
approaches that could be adopted. However, there are limited considerations made for methodological considerations and/or gaps in the knowledge base.
|
could be adopted. You have offered a very good critique of the evidence base on which your judgments are made, including some methodological considerations as well as some gaps in the knowledge
base.
|
different approaches. You have offered an excellent critique of the evidence base on which your judgments are made including methodological considerations as well as gaps in the knowledge
base.
|
Professional Communicati on
(e.g., Writing Style, References and Presentation)
|
A lack of professional communication individually and/or as a group. Work has been poorly formatted and is not digestible to the end user. The work has been poorly communicated individually and/or as a group, in a style that is unable to communicate key points. There are significant punctuation, spelling or grammar errors present. If relevant, the body language is distracting or unengaging throughout the presentation, individually and/or as a group. Overall, work has been poorly presented individually and/or as a group.
|
An inadequate level of professional communication used individually and/or as a group. Work has been poorly formatted and is not attractive and is hard to digest by the end user. The work has been inadequately communicated individually and/or as a group in a style that is unable to communicate key points. There are numerous punctuation, spelling or grammar errors present. If relevant, the body language is largely distracting or unengaging throughout the presentation, individually and/or as a group. Overall, work has been presented with inadequate clarity individually and/or as a group.
|
A satisfactory level of professional communication individually and/or as a group. Work has been formatted in a satisfactory manner and is somewhat digestible to the end user. The work has been satisfactorily communicated individually and/or as a group in a somewhat clear style, with considerable reliance on notes, individually and/or as a group. There are frequent punctuation, spelling or grammar errors, and if applicable, there has been satisfactory use of tone of voice alongside satisfactory vocabulary and terminology use, individually and/or as a group. If relevant, the body language individually and/or as a group, throughout the presentation somewhat maintains the audience`s attention, or on key messages associated. Overall, work has been presented with satisfactory clarity individually and/or as a group
|
A good level of professional communication individually and/or as a group. Work has been formatted and is somewhat attractive and digestible to the end user. The work has been communicated individually and/or as a group in a style that is somewhat able to synthesise key points explicitly and coherently, with some reliance on notes, individually and/or as a group. There are some punctuation, spelling or grammar errors, and if applicable, there has been good use of tone of voice alongside good vocabulary and terminology use, individually and/or as a group. If relevant, the body language throughout the presentation individually and/or as a group is good, ensuring the audience`s attention is mostly focussed on the speaker, or on key messages. Overall, work has been presented with good clarity individually and/or as a group.
|
A very good level of professional communication individually and/or as a group. Work has been formatted and is mostly attractive and digestible to the end user. The work has been communicated individually and/or as a group in a style that is (in parts) able to synthesise key points explicitly and coherently, with minor to limited reliance on notes, individually and/or as a group. There are minor punctuation, spelling or grammar errors, and if applicable, there has been very good use of tone of voice alongside a very good vocabulary and terminology use, individually and/or as a group. If relevant, the body language throughout the presentation, individually and/or as a group is very good, ensuring the audience`s attention is focussed on the speaker, or on key messages associated within the text. Overall, work has been presented with very good clarity individually and/or as a group.
|
An excellent level of professional communication individually and/or as a group. Work has been formatted excellently and is attractive and digestible to the end user. The work has been excellently communicated individually and/or as a group, in a style that is able to synthesise key points explicitly and coherently, with little to no reliance on notes, individually and/or as a group. There are no obvious punctuation, spelling or grammar errors, and if applicable, there has been an excellent use of tone of voice alongside an excellent vocabulary and terminology use, individually and/or as a group. If relevant, the body language throughout the presentation, individually and/or as a group is excellent, ensuring the audience`s attention is positively focussed on the speaker, or on key messages associated within the text. Overall, work has been presented with excellent clarity individually and/or as a group.
|