Custom-Written, AI & Plagiarism-Free with Passing "Guaranteed"

money back guarantee
Assignment Briefs 10-29-2024

Working in small groups, learners will conduct a VO2max tests using methods of collection which are commonly used within Sports Science.

Module Assessments

The prices quoted here is for the complete assessment which includes both presentation and written report. 100% plagiarism free and NO AI guaranteed.

Assessment

Weighting

Type of Assessment (e.g. Essay)

Assessment length

Format of submission (e.g. Word)

Submission Deadline

1

40%

Presentation

10 minutes per student

Power Point

 

2

60%

Written Report

2000 words

Word

 

Assessment 1 Brief

Presentation 40%

Presentation – In pairs, you are required to deliver a presentation (10min per student), that describes the structure, function and movement of the musculoskeletal system for a specific movement. The movement will be chosen from one of the studied functional movement screening tests. The data collection must be recorded/photographed as supporting evidence of process

The presentation should include:

Introduction. Introduce yourself as a group, describe the structure and function of the musculoskeletal anatomy to provide context to the later movement test.

Method. Introduce the movement test. How did you set up the test. How was the test performed?

What equipment was used etc.

Findings/Discussion. With reference to your movement test and scores achieved by your participant, provide a detailed description of the musculoskeletal systems interactions to allow movement. This should include joints, movement, contraction types, muscles that are agonist/antagonist etc.

Summary. Provide some key take home messages, summarising the key points.

Assessment Specific Instructions:

  • The presentation is 10minutes per student (i.e. a group of 2 will deliver for 20minutes). Students will be advised when they reach the final minute and all students will be stopped at the maximum time (calculated as: Number of Students x 10minutes).
  • Students must submit their presentation by 6pm on Wednesday 9th October 2024. Once submitted, for marking and the deadline has passed students must not edit their slides.
  • Students will be allocated a time slot to deliver their presentation. Students must arrive in time for their slot and be set up ready to present. Presentations will take place on Thursday 10th and Friday 11th October 2024.
  • A full reference list of all references used throughout the presentation should be displayed at the end of the presentation.
  • Evidence of process. Students should include images and copies of data collection logs etc as evidence of process either throughout their presentation or at the end as an appendix

Assessment 2 Brief

Written Report 60%

Working in small groups, learners will conduct a VO2max tests using methods of collection which are commonly used within Sports Science. Learners will then individually interpret a data set, compare their findings against quality published scientific literature and draw conclusions on the cardiovascular, respiratory, muscular and metabolic systems response.

Students will be graded individually on the content and quality of their written piece and their ability to:

  • Introduction à (Literature review). Review current literature to provide an understanding of structures and functions (respiratory system, cardiac muscle, blood vessels and blood, cardiovascular, respiratory, muscular) into your report. What was the purpose of your investigation?
  • Methodology à A scientifically written protocol for the physiological measures taken. (Which tests did you conduct? Number of participants? Who were the participants? How did you prepare participants for the test(s)? How did you conduct the tests / the protocol used? How were results collated and analysed?)
  • Results à Clearly display and interpret the results of your study using appropriate design (graph / table / chart)
  • Discussion à Consider your results against current literature to explore and discuss how the systems integrate to respond and perform under exercise stress. Were there any outside factors that could have influenced the results? Are there any considerations / recommendations should you repeat the tests?
  • Conclusion à Conclude your report, identifying the effects of exercise stress (VO2max) on the data you collected, summarising key physiological responses identified
  • This written piece is a 2000 word essay (the reference list is exempt from the word count).
  • Students must take part in the data collection in order to complete this essay and will evidence this within their ‘process of work’, which is submitted within an appendix.
  • All students are required to submit their essay as a word document by 6pm on Friday 1st November 2024 for marking.
  • Students should utilise OneSearch to search for scholarly literature. A reference list of all references must be included at the end of the report.

Assessment Specific Instructions

Assessment One Marking Criteria

Presentation - (all marks are subject to change until the work is moderated)

 

Fail (0-19%)

F

Inadequate (20-

39%)

F

Satisfactory (40-

49%)

3rd

Good (50-59%)

2:2

Very Good (60-69%)

2:1

Excellent (70-100%)

1st

Understandin g of module/task

 

(WHAT and WHY)

You have failed to demonstrate an understanding.

A large proportion of the work is incorrect and/or has a large number of significant omissions.

You have demonstrated an inadequate understanding (e.g., description, explanation, analysis, and discussion) of the empirical and theoretical underpinnings of this module/ task.

Terminology has been used incorrectly, core content areas are not discussed and there are some significant errors and/or omissions.

You have demonstrated a satisfactory understanding (e.g., description, explanation, analysis, and discussion) of the empirical and theoretical underpinnings of this module/ task. However, terminology may be used incorrectly, core content areas are only discussed briefly and there are some significant areas that could be expanded upon, clarified, or corrected.

You have demonstrated a good understanding (e.g., description, explanation, analysis, and discussion) of the empirical and theoretical underpinnings of this module/task.

Terminology is generally used correctly, and core content areas are largely discussed coherently.

However, there are some notable areas that could be expanded upon,

clarified or corrected.

You have demonstrated a very good understanding (e.g., description, explanation, analysis, and discussion) of the empirical and theoretical underpinnings of this module/task. Terminology is used correctly. Core content areas are discussed coherently and concisely, in parts, potentially beyond the scope of the core content. There are some areas that could be further expanded

upon, clarified, or corrected.

You have demonstrated an excellent understanding (e.g., description, explanation, analysis, and discussion). Your work demonstrates excellent empirical and theoretical underpinnings of this module/task. Terminology is correctly defined throughout. Core content is consistently discussed and expanded upon, potentially beyond the scope of the core content delivered.

Application of knowledge

 

(WHO, HOW & WHY)

You have failed to demonstrate an application of knowledge. You have made minimal or incoherent links to applied practice. No or extremely vague considerations of how theory translates to practice. There are no connections to specific contextual differences.

You have not shown any examples of critical insight where

You have demonstrated an inadequate application of knowledge. You have made inadequate or generally unclear links to applied practice.

Inadequate and unsecure considerations of how theory translates to practice. There are very limited connections made to specific contextual differences.

You have shown inadequate examples of

You have demonstrated a satisfactory application of knowledge. You have made satisfactory links to applied practice.

Satisfactory considerations of how theory translates to practice. There are occasional connections to specific contextual differences.

 

You have shown satisfactory examples of critical insight where you

have compared different

You have demonstrated a good application of knowledge. You have made good links to applied practice. Good considerations of how theory translates to practice. There are some connections to specific contextual differences and approaches to practice.

 

You have shown good examples of critical insight where you have

compared different

You have demonstrated a very good application of knowledge. You have made very good links to applied practice. Very good considerations of how theory translates to practice are made. There are several connections made to specific contextual differences and approaches to practice.

 

 

You have shown very good examples of critical insight where you have compared

different approaches that

You have demonstrated an excellent application of knowledge. You have made excellent and explicit links to applied practice.

Excellent considerations of how theory translates to practice are made. There are excellent, frequent, and well considered connections made to specific contextual differences and approaches to practice.

You have shown excellent examples of critical insight

where you have compared

 

 

 

you have compared different approaches that could be adopted.

critical insight where you have not compared different approaches that could be adopted.

approaches that could be adopted. However, there are very limited (if any) considerations made for methodological considerations and/or gaps in the knowledge base.

approaches that could be adopted. However, there are limited considerations made for methodological considerations and/or gaps in the knowledge base.

could be adopted. You have offered a very good critique of the evidence base on which your judgments are made, including some methodological considerations as well as some gaps in the knowledge

base.

different approaches. You have offered an excellent critique of the evidence base on which your judgments are made including methodological considerations as well as gaps in the knowledge

base.

Professional Communicati on

 

(e.g., Writing Style, References and Presentation)

A lack of professional communication individually and/or as a group. Work has been poorly formatted and is not digestible to the end user. The work has been poorly communicated individually and/or as a group, in a style that is unable to communicate key points. There are significant punctuation, spelling or grammar errors present. If relevant, the body language is distracting or unengaging throughout the presentation, individually and/or as a group. Overall, work has been poorly presented individually and/or as a group.

An inadequate level of professional communication used individually and/or as a group. Work has been poorly formatted and is not attractive and is hard to digest by the end user. The work has been inadequately communicated individually and/or as a group in a style that is unable to communicate key points. There are numerous punctuation, spelling or grammar errors present. If relevant, the body language is largely distracting or unengaging throughout the presentation, individually and/or as a group. Overall, work has been presented with inadequate clarity individually and/or as a group.

A satisfactory level of professional communication individually and/or as a group. Work has been formatted in a satisfactory manner and is somewhat digestible to the end user. The work has been satisfactorily communicated individually and/or as a group in a somewhat clear style, with considerable reliance on notes, individually and/or as a group. There are frequent punctuation, spelling or grammar errors, and if applicable, there has been satisfactory use of tone of voice alongside satisfactory vocabulary and terminology use, individually and/or as a group. If relevant, the body language individually and/or as a group, throughout the presentation somewhat maintains the audience`s attention, or on key messages associated. Overall, work has been presented with satisfactory clarity individually and/or as a group

A good level of professional communication individually and/or as a group. Work has been formatted and is somewhat attractive and digestible to the end user. The work has been communicated individually and/or as a group in a style that is somewhat able to synthesise key points explicitly and coherently, with some reliance on notes, individually and/or as a group. There are some punctuation, spelling or grammar errors, and if applicable, there has been good use of tone of voice alongside good vocabulary and terminology use, individually and/or as a group. If relevant, the body language throughout the presentation individually and/or as a group is good, ensuring the audience`s attention is mostly focussed on the speaker, or on key messages. Overall, work has been presented with good clarity individually and/or as a group.

A very good level of professional communication individually and/or as a group. Work has been formatted and is mostly attractive and digestible to the end user. The work has been communicated individually and/or as a group in a style that is (in parts) able to synthesise key points explicitly and coherently, with minor to limited reliance on notes, individually and/or as a group. There are minor punctuation, spelling or grammar errors, and if applicable, there has been very good use of tone of voice alongside a very good vocabulary and terminology use, individually and/or as a group. If relevant, the body language throughout the presentation, individually and/or as a group is very good, ensuring the audience`s attention is focussed on the speaker, or on key messages associated within the text. Overall, work has been presented with very good clarity individually and/or as a group.

An excellent level of professional communication individually and/or as a group. Work has been formatted excellently and is attractive and digestible to the end user. The work has been excellently communicated individually and/or as a group, in a style that is able to synthesise key points explicitly and coherently, with little to no reliance on notes, individually and/or as a group. There are no obvious punctuation, spelling or grammar errors, and if applicable, there has been an excellent use of tone of voice alongside an excellent vocabulary and terminology use, individually and/or as a group. If relevant, the body language throughout the presentation, individually and/or as a group is excellent, ensuring the audience`s attention is positively focussed on the speaker, or on key messages associated within the text. Overall, work has been presented with excellent clarity individually and/or as a group.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Evidence of Process

No apparent engagement in the module, evidenced by no participation in formative assessment or feedback opportunities or team work, or other.

There is no submission support by drafts and/or other documents.

Inadequate engagement in the module evidenced by: infrequent participation in formative assessment or feedback opportunities, or team work, or other.

There is very limited support of the submission by drafts and/or other documents.

Satisfactory engagement in the module which is evidenced by: occasional participation in formative assessment or feedback opportunities, or team work, or other.

There is limited support of the submission by drafts and/or other documents.

Good engagement in the module which is evidenced by: some participation in formative assessment or feedback opportunities or team work, or other. There is some support of the submission by drafts and/or other documents.

Very good engagement in the module which is evidenced by: participation in formative assessment or feedback opportunities. This is supported, in parts, by the submission of drafts and/or other documents.

Excellent engagement in the module which is evidenced by: consistent participation in formative assessment or feedback opportunities, or team work, or other. This is supported by the submission of drafts and/or other documents.

Assessment Two Marking Criteria

Written Report (all marks are subject to change until work is moderated)

 

Fail (0-19%)

F

Inadequate (20-

39%)

F

Satisfactory (40-

49%)

3rd

Good (50-59%)

2:2

Very Good (60-69%)

2:1

Excellent (70-100%)

1st

Understandin g of module/task

You have failed to demonstrate an understanding.

You have demonstrated an inadequate understanding (e.g., description, explanation,

You have demonstrated a satisfactory understanding (e.g., description, explanation, analysis, and

You have demonstrated a good understanding (e.g., description, explanation, analysis,

You have demonstrated a very good understanding (e.g., description, explanation, analysis, and

You have demonstrated an excellent understanding (e.g., description, explanation, analysis, and

 

(WHAT and WHY)

A large proportion of the work is incorrect and/or has a large number of significant omissions.

analysis, and discussion) of the empirical and theoretical underpinnings of this module/ task.

Terminology has been used incorrectly, core content areas are not discussed and there are significant errors and/or omissions.

discussion) of the empirical and theoretical underpinnings of this module/ task. However, terminology may be used incorrectly, core content areas are only discussed briefly and there are significant areas that could be expanded upon, clarified, or corrected.

and discussion) of the empirical and theoretical underpinnings of this module/task.

Terminology is generally used correctly, and core content areas are largely discussed coherently.

However, there are some notable areas that could be expanded upon, clarified, or corrected.

discussion) of the empirical and theoretical underpinnings of this module/task. Terminology is used correctly. Core content areas are discussed coherently and concisely, in parts, potentially beyond the scope of the core content delivered. There are some areas that could be further expanded upon, clarified, or corrected.

discussion). Your work demonstrates excellent empirical and theoretical underpinnings of this module/task. Terminology is correctly defined throughout. Core content is consistently discussed and expanded upon, potentially beyond the scope of the core content delivered.

Application of knowledge

(WHO, HOW & WHY)

You have failed to demonstrate an application of knowledge. You have made minimal or incoherent links to applied practice. No or extremely vague considerations of how theory translates to practice. There are no connections to specific contextual differences.

You have not shown any examples of critical insight where you have compared different approaches that could be adopted.

You have demonstrated an inadequate application of knowledge. You have made inadequate or generally unclear links to applied practice.

Inadequate and unsecure considerations of how theory translates to practice. There are very limited connections made to specific contextual differences.

You have shown inadequate examples of critical insight where you have compared different approaches that could be adopted.

You have demonstrated a satisfactory application of knowledge. You have made satisfactory links to applied practice.

Satisfactory considerations of how theory translates to practice. There are occasional connections to specific contextual differences

You have shown satisfactory examples of critical insight where you have compared different approaches that could be adopted.

You have demonstrated a good application of knowledge. You have made good links to applied practice. Good considerations of how theory translates to practice. There are some connections to specific contextual differences and approaches to practice

You have shown good examples of critical insight where you have compared different approaches that could be adopted.

You have demonstrated a very good application of knowledge. You have made very good links to applied practice. Very good considerations of how theory translates to practice.

There are several connections made to specific contextual differences and approaches to practice.

You have shown very good examples of critical insight where you have compared different approaches that could be adopted. You have offered a very good critique of the evidence base on which your judgments are made

You have demonstrated an excellent application of knowledge. You have made excellent and explicit links to applied practice.

Excellent considerations of how theory translates to practice are made. There are excellent, frequent, and well considered connections made to specific contextual differences and approaches to practice.

You have shown excellent examples of critical insight where you have compared different approaches. You have offered an excellent critique of the evidence base on which your judgments are made including methodological considerations as well as gaps in the knowledge base.

Professional Communicati on

 

(e.g., Writing Style, References and Presentation)

Very unclear written style. No references presented with very frequent errors regarding spelling, punctuation,

and grammar which severely impacts the clarity of the work.

Unclear written style. Inadequate number of references presented to support the points you make or are inappropriately presented.

Frequent errors regardin g spelling, punctuation, and grammar which significantly impact the clarity of the work.

A satisfactory and mostly clear written style.

Limited number of references presented to support the points you make or are inappropriately presented.

Regular errors regarding spelling, punctuation, and grammar which does impact the clarity of the work.

A good and mostly clear written style.

Occasional errors with referencing in relation to the prescribed conventions.

Spelling, punctuation, and grammar has some errors which may detract from the understanding of the work.

A very good and clear written style.

Adherence to university referencing conventions with minimal errors which do not detract from the understanding of the work. Very good attention to detail regarding spelling, punctuation, and grammar with minimal errors which do not detract from the understanding of the work.

An excellent, fluid, and articulate written style used.

Adherence to university referencing conventions with minimal (if any) errors. Excellent attention to detail regarding spelling, punctuation, and grammar with minimal, (if any) errors.

Evidence of Process

No apparent engagement in the module content evidenced by no participation in in formative assessment or feedback opportunities.

There is no submission support by drafts and/or other documents.

Inadequate engagement in the module content evidenced by: infrequent participation in formative assessment or feedback opportunities or other.

There is very limited support of the submission by drafts and/or other documents.

Satisfactory engagement in the module which is evidenced by: occasional participation in formative assessment or feedback opportunities or other.

There is limited support of the submission by drafts and/or other documents.

Good engagement in the module which is evidenced by: some participation in formative assessment or feedback opportunities or other.

There is some support of the submission by drafts and/or other documents.

Very good engagement in the module which is evidenced by: participation in formative assessment or feedback opportunities. This is supported, in parts, by the submission of drafts and/or other documents.

Excellent engagement in the module which is evidenced by: consistent participation in formative assessment or feedback opportunities or other. This is supported by the submission of drafts and/or other documents.

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions

Our Giveaways

Plagiarism Report

for £20 Free

Formatting

for £12 Free

Title page

for £10 Free

Bibliography

for £18 Free

Outline

for £9 Free

Limitless Amendments

for £14 Free

Get all these features for
£83.00 FREE

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

Have a look at our samples which are written by our professional writers to give you an insight into how your work is going to look like. We have added some essays, coursework, assignments as well as dissertations.

View Our Samples

Jan Mon 2025

MST224: Mathematical Methods Assignment

Everything About MST224: Mathematical Methods Assignment Mathematical methods, ...

Jan Sun 2025

Unit: 5 Leadership and Management for Se

Unit: 5 Leadership and Management for Service Industries Pearson Set Theme: Ar...

Jan Mon 2025

You are working for a Structural Enginee

Higher National Certificate Construction and the Built Environment Unit 19 Pri...