1.1 Explain what is meant by professional development.
K-650-1144 Professional Development and Academic Writing Skills Assignmen
This page contains the K-650-1144 Professional Development and Academic Writing Skills assessment brief issued by Inspire London College for the OTHM Level 5 Extended Diploma in Health and Social Care Management. The brief identifies this as a mandatory Level 4 unit carrying 20 credits, with a stated assessment length of 2,250 words ±10%, including 750 words for the report, and Pass/Refer grading.
The unit reference deserves attention when checking this assessment online. The college brief uses K-650-1144, while the official OTHM qualification specification records the same unit as K/650/1144 Professional Development and Academic Writing Skills. Learners checking the unit against OTHM can refer to the official OTHM qualification specification for the registered unit details.
Assessment Brief
|
Centre Name |
Inspire London College |
|
Qualification |
OTHM Level 5 Extended Diploma in Health and Social Care Management |
|
Unit Number and Title |
K-650-1144 Professional Development and Academic Writing Skills |
|
Unit Level |
4 |
|
Unit Type |
Mandatory |
|
Credit Value |
20 |
|
Word Count |
2250±10% (750 for report) |
|
Grading Criteria |
Pass / Refer |
|
Required Formatting |
Use Calibri (Body) Font Style, Size 12 for Text, Size 14 (Bold) for Headings, 13 (Bold) for Subheadings. |
|
Plagiarised Content Information |
Ensure your work is original and demonstrates your own understanding and research. |
|
AI Content Information |
All assignments must be entirely self-written. AI-generated content is strictly prohibited. |
|
In-text Citation Requirement |
You are required to include In-text citations for each assessment criterion and list all sources in a Bibliography section. |
|
Assignment Grading Information |
Submit your assignment by the deadline specified by your tutor. Early submissions will be marked within seven to ten working days from the official due date. |
|
Student Declaration |
Every coursework submission must include a Signed Learner Declaration confirming the authenticity of your work. |
|
Assignment Title |
Professional Development and Academic Writing Skills |
|
Assessment Requirements: |
To achieve a “Pass” for this unit, learners must provide clear and sufficient evidence demonstrating that all learning outcomes have been met and that each assessment criterion has been fully addressed in accordance with the required standards. |
|
UNIT LEARNING OUTCOMES: |
|
LO1: Understand the principles of professional development. LO2: Be able to develop goals and targets for their own professional development. LO3: Be able to prepare a professional development plan. LO4: Be able to use models of reflective practice to evaluate own development. LO5: Be able to apply appropriate academic conventions in written communication. Refer to the learning outcomes and assessment criteria below to write your responses in the assignment worksheet. |
|
LEARNING OUTCOME: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA: |
|
The learner will: |
The learner can: |
|
LO1: Understand the principles of professional development. |
1.1 Explain what is meant by professional development. 1.2 Explain ways of overcoming barriers to professional development. 1.3 Determine the different sources available for professional development. 1.4 Analyse factors to consider when selecting opportunities and activities for keeping knowledge and practice up to date. |
|
LO2: Be able to develop goals and targets for their own professional development. |
2.1 Evaluate own knowledge against standards and benchmarks. 2.2 Create SMART goals and targets for own professional development. 2.3 Determine appropriate goals and targets to meet expected standards. 2.4 Assess learning opportunities to meet objectives and reflect personal learning style. |
|
LO3: Be able to prepare a professional development plan. |
3.1 Produce a professional development plan. 3.2 Apply techniques to review progress toward personal and professional objectives. |
|
LO4: Be able to use models of reflective practice to evaluate own development. |
4.1 Compare models of reflective practice. 4.2 Apply reflective practice techniques to improve performance. 4.3 Evaluate the effectiveness of own reflective practice. |
|
LO5: Be able to apply appropriate academic conventions in written communication. |
5.1 Explain the principles of academic writing. 5.2 Produce written work according to academic conventions. 5.3 Apply techniques to review on own academic writing skills. |
Guidance Notes |
|
Sources of Professional Development: The process of improving and increasing one’s knowledge, skills, and competencies in a professional context to maintain and enhance career performance. Examples may include:
Standards and Benchmarks: In this context, it refers to predefined levels of performance or criteria used to measure knowledge, skills, or quality. Examples may include:
Learning Opportunities: Situations or resources that enable learning and skill development. Examples may include:
Academic Writing: A formal style of writing used in educational and professional contexts, characterised by clarity, evidence-based arguments, and structured presentation. Examples may include:
Academic Conventions: The accepted rules and standards used in academic writing. For example:
|
Suggested Resources
Recommended Resources
- Bolton, G. (2018) Reflective Practice: Writing and Professional Development (4th Ed) London: Sage Publishing.
Available at:
https://www.worldofbooks.com/en-gb/products/reflective-practice-book-gillie-e-j-bolton-
9781446282359?sku=GOR006048202&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=17416831122&g braid=0AAAAADZzAIC-
KVlUKozZ6fCKuYRejfUIN&gclid=CjwKCAiAmp3LBhAkEiwAJM2JUFbcwEDevn3Cn_2o_nEc EJZPcwSvzwUV3HZqoLEvnjsq1Az8ME7hmBoC3QkQAvD_BwE
- DOH (2013) The Cavendish Review: An Independent Review into Health care Assistants and Support Workers in the NHS and Social Care settings, London. HMSO.
Available at:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7b9df6e5274a7202e18537/Cavendis h_Review.pdf
- Gibbs, G. (1988) Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford: Oxford Further Education Unit.
Available at:
https://thoughtsmostlyaboutlearning.wordpress.com/wp-
content/uploads/2015/12/learning-by-doing-graham-gibbs.pdf
Websites
- www.communitycare.co.uk Online journal for social care
- www.cqc.org.uk Care Quality Commission regulations for providers under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014
- www.nmc.org.uk Nursing and midwifery regulator
|
ASSIGNMENT BRIEF |
|||
|
|
Guidelines for Assignment Completion and Submission |
|
|
|
Points to consider |
Explanation |
||
|
Academic Integrity and Authenticity Guidelines |
Learners must ensure that all submitted work is their own, authentic, and relevant to each assignment criterion. Plagiarism: using someone else’s work without proper referencing and collusion, submitting similar work with others are serious offences. Self-plagiarism, or reusing previously submitted work without approval, is also not allowed. Avoid relying on AI-generated content, as it may lack originality and academic depth. Focus on aligning your responses with the specific action verbs in the criteria (e.g., evaluate, describe, explain). All submissions must include a statement of authenticity with a word count and a plagiarism similarity report using tools like Grammarly or ScanMyEssay. ILC recommends the following to check plagiarism/similarity. https://www.grammarly.com/plagiarism-checker https://www.scanmyessay.com Learners are required to attach the similarity report in the submission slot or email to the tutor. |
||
|
Avoid Using AI- Generated Content |
Refrain from relying on AI-generated content for your assignments. Such content lacks depth, originality, and relevance, and could lead to academic integrity issues. Focus on creating authentic work that reflects your own understanding and research. |
||
|
Referencing and In-text Citation Requirements |
Learners are expected to use the Harvard Referencing System to acknowledge all sources, methodologies, and applications used. In-text citations must be included for each criterion, with full references listed in the bibliography section, following correct Harvard formatting. Only use credible, peer-reviewed sources such as books, journals, and articles published within the last five years. Avoid unreliable sources like blogs, Wikipedia, or job sites. Proper referencing reflects academic integrity and ensures adherence to scholarly standards. |
||
|
Relevancy of Content |
Align the content with each assignment criterion. Focus on the action verbs (e.g., assess, evaluate, identify, describe, demonstrate, explain) mentioned in the criteria and modify your responses accordingly. Irrelevant information may result in your work being referred for further improvement. |
||
|
Duplication/self Plagiarism |
Submitting work that largely repeats material previously graded for the same or another course, here or elsewhere, counts as self-plagiarism, unless it’s an improved version approved for reassessment. This is considered academic misconduct. |
||
|
Material Proofreading |
Use Microsoft Word`s grammar and spell check, the use of Grammarly is strictly prohibited due to its AI text-generation capabilities |
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Word Count Policy and Adherence |
Learners must complete the assignment within the required word count of 2250 words, with a permitted margin of ±10% and 750 words for the report. This word count excludes the index, headings, tables, images, footnotes, appendices, and reference list. Strict adherence to the word count is essential. Submitting significantly less may lead to refer, while exceeding the limit can affect clarity and assessment. Learners are advised to plan and structure their content effectively to meet both the word limit and the quality expectations. |
|
Appendices |
You may include appendices with supporting information, but they must be clearly referenced in your assignment. Tables, graphs, diagrams, Gantt charts, and flowcharts that support your report should be added at the end of your submitted document. Any published sources, like annual reports or company literature, must be cited in the text using Harvard referencing and listed at the end of your assignment. |
|
Assignment Formatting Requirements |
Follow the formatting guidelines below. Using Calibri (Body) font, size 12 for text, size 14 bold for headings, and size 13 bold for subheadings. Include the assessment criterion statement before each response for clarity. Proper formatting ensures a professional presentation and may impact your overall grade. |
|
Paragraph Form and Suitable Headings |
Avoid using unnecessary bullet points and short sentences. Instead, address each criterion in a well-structured paragraph with appropriate headings. This ensures clarity and coherence in your writing, making it easier for evaluators to follow your argument. Make sure that each criterion is clearly presented with proper formatting, including headings, paragraphs, and consistent style throughout. |
|
Comprehensive Coverage of Criteria according to Assignment brief |
Address all the criteria listed in the assignment brief. Missing any criterion could result in not achieving a passing grade. Make sure your response fully addresses and gives appropriate consideration to each criterion. Additionally, follow the additional guidelines or scenarios (if given) in the brief to stay relevant to the demand of the criteria. |
|
Case Studies and Visual Aids (if applicable) |
Incorporate relevant case studies, smart art, and figures to enhance the effectiveness of your content. This incorporation can make complex information more engaging, potentially earning you extra marks. |
|
Updated and Peer-Reviewed Sources |
Consult recent (within the past five years) peer-reviewed articles, journals, and books. Relying on current and credible sources enhances your arguments and shows that you are informed about the latest developments in your field. |
|
Submission Regulations and Assignment Grading Information |
You must submit your coursework online via the College’s Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) as a single electronic document in .docx format by the due date. Submissions will be graded within seven to ten working days after the deadline. |
|
Key Terminologies |
|
|
Describe |
To describe means to create a picture with words, but not simply writing a list of bullet points. Your description should include relevant details that help the reader fully understand the subject. |
|
Analyse |
To analyse something means to examine it carefully and in detail to gain a deeper understanding or explanation. This involves identifying the key components or ideas of the subject and exploring the relationships and connections between them. |
|
Evaluate |
To evaluate, decide on your subject’s significance, value, or quality after carefully studying its good and bad features. Use authoritative (e.g., from established authors or theorists in the field) and, to some extent, personal appraisal of both contributions and limitations of the subject. Similar to assessing. |
|
Discuss |
To discuss in an essay, consider your subject from different points of view. Examine, analyse and present considerations for and against the problem or statement. |
|
Critically |
Often used in conjunction with other directive words, such as critically discuss, critically examine or critically analyse. It does not mean to criticise. It is asking you to give a balanced answer that points out mistakes or weaknesses and any favourable aspects of the subject of the question. The decision or overall judgment you make must be supported with evidence from reliable sources. |
|
Outline |
To outline is to give a clear and structured summary of the main points or stages of a topic. It should be brief, focused, and show the overall structure without going into deep detail. |
|
Compare |
To compare is to examine two or more items or ideas and highlight their similarities and differences. This may also include evaluating their significance or impact in a given context. |
|
Identify |
To identify means to clearly recognise and name specific facts, features, people, problems, or ideas. It often involves listing or pointing out key elements without needing to explain them in detail. |
|
Describe |
To describe means to create a picture with words, but not simply writing a list of bullet points. |
|
Explain |
To explain something, you will need to provide a clear account of your understanding, including details like why and how. |
K-650-1144 LO1 Assessment Criteria
| Assessment Criterion | Requirement |
|---|---|
| 1.1 | Explain what is meant by professional development. |
| 1.2 | Explain ways of overcoming barriers to professional development. |
| 1.3 | Determine the different sources available for professional development. |
| 1.4 | Analyse factors to consider when selecting opportunities and activities for keeping knowledge and practice up to date. |
These four requirements appear separately in the assessment brief and should remain clearly distinguishable when the unit is being reviewed or prepared for submission.
1.1 Explain What Is Meant by Professional Development
1.1 Explain what is meant by professional development is the first assessment criterion under LO1: Understand the principles of professional development in K-650-1144 Professional Development and Academic Writing Skills.
It should be read as a separate assessment requirement rather than as a heading covering the whole of LO1. The brief assigns different requirements to the next three criteria: 1.2 deals with overcoming barriers to professional development, 1.3 covers sources available for professional development, and 1.4 requires analysis of factors involved in selecting opportunities and activities for keeping knowledge and practice up to date.
There is also a second part of the brief that is directly relevant when checking K-650-1144 1.1. In its Key Terminologies section, the document explains that the command word “Explain” requires a clear account of understanding that includes why and how. This means the exact wording of 1.1 should be considered together with the command-word guidance supplied later in the same assessment document.
Need Support With the Complete K-650-1144 Brief?
A search for “1.1 Explain what is meant by professional development” only shows one part of this unit. The complete K-650-1144 brief contains five learning outcomes and assessment criteria covering professional development goals, a professional development plan, reflective practice and academic writing conventions.
If you need support based on the complete brief rather than one isolated criterion, our OTHM assignment help covers OTHM assessment requirements by unit, learning outcome and assessment criterion.


