3
Steps to Get a Perfectly Written Assignment
One
Click “order this assignment now”
Two
Choose your deadline & pay for it
Three
Get custom-written work ready for submission

Custom-Written, AI & Plagiarism-Free with Passing "Guaranteed"

money back guarantee
Assignment Briefs 03-05-2024

Construct a research question or focus for a project relevant to Health and Social Care

Word length:  3000

Due date: TBC

Task: A literature review to critically evaluate real time problems or issues found across health and social care industry.

Specific Guidance on the Assignment

  • You will construct a research question for a project in health, wellbeing and social care and propose a rationale, outlining the current gap in the literature that your question aims to fill.
  • The proposal will also include an appraisal of different methodologies and the evaluation of sources of evidence that support the research question.
  • You will outline the potential implications for practice that your research will support.
  • In your assignment you MUST support your work with appropriate references
  • You are NOT required to collect any data for this module
  • The aim of the proposal is for you to demonstrate that you are aware of the current state of knowledge around your topics are and that you understand the key methodologies used previously

LEARNING OUTCOMES OF THE MODULE

Construct a research question or focus for a project relevant to Health and Social Care

Appraise different methodologies used to generate evidence basis.

Evaluate sources of evidence which will support the research questions or focus for the capstone project.

 

Suggested Framework to present 3000 words:

Title

  • The title of your assignment will be the research question that you are proposing to answer.
  • You can write the question based upon any topic that is relevant to your current/future practice

Rationale for doing the project (1500 words)

  • What is the nature and extent of the problem/issue?
  • Evaluate sources of evidence that support the research question and make the angle of your research clear
  • Give a rationale for doing the study – how will it inform practice and benefit stakeholders

Justification for the chosen methodology (750 words)

  • Evaluate the methodology of previous studies that have been conducted in this area of research
  • Justify your choice of doing a literature review by appraising its strengths and weaknesses

Method (1000 words)

  • Outline the ways in which you are going to search, select, extract, assess and synthesise the data

Gantt chart (250 words)

  • Provide a study timetable that shows the research question can be answered in the time you have available.

References

Please check that you have used the Harvard system and make sure that all references in the main body of your work are in the list at the end of your essay and vice versa.

Assignment Sections

A+/A (70-100%)

B+/B (60-69%)

C+/C (50-59%)

D/D+ (40-49%)

Fail (0-39%)

Rationale

30/100

It has a research question which has been very clearly formulated. It demonstrates excellent knowledge of the topic with a clear and concise outline of the issue and evaluation of previous research. There is an exceptional rationale.

A logical research question is proposed. It demonstrates very good knowledge of the topic with a very good outline of the issue and evaluation of previous research. There is a very strong rationale presented.

An appropriate research question is proposed. It demonstrates satisfactory knowledge of the topic, with minor errors or omissions in the outline of the issue and evaluation of previous research. There is a strong rationale presented

A satisfactory research question is proposed. It demonstrates minimal knowledge of the topic, with errors or omissions in the outline of the issue and evaluation of previous research. There is a brief rationale presented

 It has a research question which is poorly stated. It demonstrates unsatisfactory knowledge of the topic with an incoherent outline of the issue and evaluation of previous research. The rationale and purpose are unclear

Justifying the chosen methodology

20/100

Each methodology is detailed accurately and the chosen methodology is justified clearly and concisely.

There is mostly an accurate account of each methodology and there is mostly a clear and concise account when the chosen methodology is justified.

Each methodology is detailed with some accuracy and there is some clarity when the chosen methodology is justified.

Each methodology is briefly detailed and there is minimal clarity when the chosen methodology is justified.

Each methodology is not clearly detailed and there is no clarity when the chosen methodology is justified.

Method 25/100

 

The outline of each stage of the method are entirely relevant to the topic and thoroughly explored. Demonstrates an exceptional appreciation of the limits and/or appropriate use of particular approaches

There is a well-developed outline of each stage of the method. Demonstrates a very good appreciations of the limits and/or appropriate use of particular approaches

There is a good outline of each stage of the method. Demonstrates a good appreciation of the limits and/or appropriate use of particular approaches

There is a brief outline of each stage of the method. Demonstrates a minimal appreciation of the limits and/or appropriate use of particular approaches

Each stage of the method is not clearly stated. There is no appreciation of the limits and/or appropriate use of particular approaches

Use of information to communicate

25/100

There is an exceptional fluent writing style and organisation and coherence that clearly enhances the argument.  All claims are supported with high-quality sources.

There is a fluent writing style and strong logical organisation that enhances the argument. Claims are supported with high-quality sources although there may be one or two errors or omissions

In some parts, there is a fluent writing style and some logic to the organisation. There are references to support claims, but these may be lower-quality or there may be some omissions.    

Writing has limited fluency and organisation to support arguments. There are minimal references to support claims and they are of a low-quality with omissions.

Writing is incoherent and disorganised.  Referencing has not been used or is very difficult to identify. 

 

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions
paypal checkout

Our Giveaways

Plagiarism Report

for £20 Free

Formatting

for £12 Free

Title page

for £10 Free

Bibliography

for £18 Free

Outline

for £9 Free

Limitless Amendments

for £14 Free

Get all these features for
£83.00 FREE

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

Have a look at our samples which are written by our professional writers to give you an insight into how your work is going to look like. We have added some essays, coursework, assignments as well as dissertations.

View Our Samples

Apr Sun 2024

Produce an Information Security Risk Ass

CASE STUDY Tasks a) Produce an Information Security Risk Assessment for the...

Apr Sun 2024

LO1: Effectively communicate a structure

 Integrated Health and Social Care Leadership and Entrepreneurship in Heal...

Apr Sat 2024

LO1 Conduct the preliminary stages invol

Higher National Assessment Designed in accordance with HEA guidelines ...