3
Steps to Get a Perfectly Written Assignment
One
Click “order this assignment now”
Two
Choose your deadline & pay for it
Three
Get custom-written work ready for submission

Custom-Written, AI & Plagiarism-Free with Passing "Guaranteed"

money back guarantee
Recent Papers 03-04-2022

Explain the micro and macro context of why this reviewed topic may be of particular significance / importance to you or others engaged in your professional or academic research area.

Assignment Task:

Your task is to write a thematic literature review The impact of financial inclusion policies on economic growth and social stability using the format below as a guide.

Literature Review Title: 

Rationale for research in this area:

(Explain the micro and macro context of why this reviewed topic may be of particular significance / importance to you or others engaged in your professional or academic research area. Explain the links with research in other related areas. Identify and explain links with academic concepts and theories that have come to your attention through your review of literature. Give reasons why you believe that your research contributes to development of your profession or academic area.) MAX 500 WORDS

 

Specific Objectives   (state in more specific terms what you will be trying to achieve.)

The principal objective(s) in undertaking this research is / will be to: MAX 100 WORDS

 

 

Literature Review

(Identify academic sources of information, material, ideas that demonstrate different approaches in your topic area related to your specific objective. Reflect and discuss the influence that these have had on the development of your choice of final research literature by which you might ground and investigate your objective. Please give the full reference of the sources (Harvard style). MAX 2200 WORDS IN TOTAL

 

Research problems / potential weaknesses  

(Identify and explain the main problem (prioritise the top two) you think you will encounter throughout the research process and the potential weakness of any conclusions that you draw. MAX 200 WORDS

Unit Learning Outcomes Assessed. 

  1. Describe the nature and purpose of good research.
  2. Critically analyse relevant evidence for the literature and reflect on their significance in an effective written form. 
  3. Formulate and produce a critical literature review.

Assignment Details and Instructions.

Format: Word document

Line spacing: 2.0

Justify

Font: 12 pt Times New Roman

Structure:  See the suggested pro forma  References listed alphabetically at the end.

Early Career/ World Class Professional Skills (PLOs) being assessed or developed/assessed. 

None

Resources

Link to Harvard Referencing 

http://libguides.mmu.ac.uk/mmuharvard

Marking Criteria *

See below  and note the penalties for excessive word count.

Penalties for Overlong Assessments

All final assessments are subject to the following mark reduction penalties:

Amount the submitted work is in excess of the provided guidance

Effect on final mark

0% - 10%

None

11% - 30%

Mark reduced by 10%

≥ 31%

Mark capped at 50%

The maximum assessment length does not include the bibliography, reference lists, title page or any appendices.

The penalties above apply equally to all submitted written assignments, oral, audio or video presentations, posters, portfolios, and any other assessments.

The mark for overlong assessments will not be reduced below the pass threshold.

No penalties apply where assessments do not achieve the pass threshold, even if the work is in excess of the provided guidance.

Assessment Criteria and Feedback*                             Student Name

  

0 - 45

45 – 49 (MARGINAL)

50 - 59

60 - 69

70 - 79

80 - 100

1. Identifies the macro /micro context for the proposed research and presents a clear rationale for its pursuit.

The context and current issues are not identified leading to no clear research objectives.

The context and current issues are partially identified, leading to objectives that are inappropriate or imprecise.

The context and current issues are sufficiently identified and expressed, but lacks clarity in some

areas, leading to an adequate but somewhat loose identification of research objectives.

The context and current issues are clearly identified and scoped, leading to the identification of appropriate research objectives.

The context and current issues are unambiguously identified, scoped and prioritized, leading to well framed research objectives.

The context and current issues identified are theoretically grounded. Factual data are well used to iterate the scenario that leads to precisely framed research objectives.

 

2. The research objectives / hypothesis are /is clear and precisely framed.

Incomplete,  lacking in

originality Not available

Poorly articulated, and not enough originality

Articulated and expressed but lacks clarity in some areas

Clearly articulated and  expressed

Fully articulated and well expressed

Original, clearly articulated and well expressed

3. Critically review and synthesize the relevant literature on the subject area.

Not identified

 

Partially addressed, although insufficient theory considered and this was not integrated. Opinion based

Satisfactory range of literature considered, analysis has some critical focus and is integrated with the literature

A good range literature considered and comprehensively utilised

Critical application and critique of concepts with evidence of breadth and depth of literature reviewed and  integrated

Outstanding Critical application and critique of concepts with evidence of breadth and depth of literature reviewed and integrated

4. Potential weaknesses wrt   to the literature review are fully recognised

Not identified

Partially identified and opinion based

Identified with some critical focus 

Clearly identified with critical focus and well articulated

Fully articulated and identified with a clear focus tentative solutions.

Fully articulated and identified with a clear focus and innovative solutions.

5.Presentation

Inadequate presentation with inconsistent referencing and muddled structure inappropriate writing  style

Poor presentation  inconsistent referencing and citations and unclear structure and/or inappropriate  writing style

Satisfactory referencing.   Reasonably structured and clear, reasonably fluent writing style.

Clear, accurate and consistent referencing. 

Clear, well linked structure.

Fluently written.

Excellent referencing and clear structure with strong links between sections.

Fluent and convincing.

Outstanding referencing and clear structure with strong links between sections. Fluent and extremely convincing.

What was done well

 

 

 

 

 

 

A key area(s) to improve this assignment

 

 

 

 

 

 

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions
paypal checkout

Our Giveaways

Plagiarism Report

for £20 Free

Formatting

for £12 Free

Title page

for £10 Free

Bibliography

for £18 Free

Outline

for £9 Free

Limitless Amendments

for £14 Free

Get all these features for
£83.00 FREE

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

Have a look at our samples which are written by our professional writers to give you an insight into how your work is going to look like. We have added some essays, coursework, assignments as well as dissertations.

View Our Samples

Apr Sun 2024

Produce an Information Security Risk Ass

CASE STUDY Tasks a) Produce an Information Security Risk Assessment for the...

Apr Sun 2024

LO1: Effectively communicate a structure

 Integrated Health and Social Care Leadership and Entrepreneurship in Heal...

Apr Sat 2024

LO1 Conduct the preliminary stages invol

Higher National Assessment Designed in accordance with HEA guidelines ...