Order this Assignment Now: £169 VALID THRU: 24-Dec-2024
Fundamentals of Oral Implantology (DEN847)
Programme: MSc in Advanced General Dental Practice
Module: Fundamentals of Oral Implantology (DEN847)Assignment: The assignment is 2 parts as given below:
Part A (2000 words)
Given the predictability of dental implant success, the attention of the oral implantology clinicians and researchers is moving from descriptions of implant success toward a more detailed analysis of factors associated with implant failure. In this essay, you are asked to to assess relevant literature and provide evidence-based information on the risk factors that you need to know, understand, advise patients and consider for planning and treatment provision for successful surgical placement of dental implants.
Part B (1500 words): As part of this module, you have been trained on the measures taken to maintain cross infection control during implant placement surgery. Discuss your role as a clinician and team leader to prevent cross infection in dental implant procedures. Identify the experience and skills you already have to work in such a role and the areas that you need to develop further.
Appropriate, relevant, and updated references should be cited.
Please submit Part A and B in one document with a single reference list at the end as it will be marked as one piece of work.
To be submitted electronically through VLE via Turnitin
Marking Descriptors
Your piece of work will be assessed according to the descriptors below:
1- Demonstration of Knowledge and Understanding
The marker will assess the following:
Demonstration of depth and systematic understanding in the topic and/across areas
Main topics are identified, and the key issues are addressed.
Demonstration that the students can work with theoretical/research-based knowledge at the forefront of their academic discipline.
Comprehensive understanding of techniques and methodologies applicable to the topic
High quality contemporary literature was accessed.
Descriptors
Distincti on (70%+)
Excellent level of understanding and knowledge of current ideas and controversies relating to the subject which reflects reading from a relevant and extensive list of publications.
Commendati on (60-69%)
Very good level of understanding and knowledge of the key topics and controversies relating to the subject reflecting a good level of background reading or appropriate literature.
Pass (50-59%)
Understanding of the main issues is evident with some understanding of current ideas and controversies relating to the subject reflecting a reasonable level of background reading.
Marginal Fail (45-49%)
The level of knowledge does not demonstrate Level 7 study and the accessed literature is not of the required quality.
Fail (
Poor level of understanding and knowledge with poor or no background reading.
2- Cognitive, Analytical and Evaluation Skills
The marker will assess the following:
Analysis: demonstration of critical awareness and analysis of complex or contradictory areas of knowledge, and communication of the outcomes effectively in the assignment
Synthesis: ability to synthesise information in a manner that may be innovative, utilising knowledge or processes from the forefront of the discipline/practice.
Evaluation: demonstration of a level of conceptual understanding that will allow the student critically to evaluate research and methodologies and argue alternative approaches.
Application: demonstration of initiative and originality in problem solving.
Descriptors
Distincti on (70%+)
Excellent level of critical analysis and reflection with concepts evaluated to an advanced level in a critical way. Strengths and weaknesses of the evidence presented along with their implications.
Commendati on (60-69%)
Very good level of critical analysis and reflection. Concepts are evaluated to a superior level in a critical way with strengths and weaknesses of the evidence presented.
Pass (50-59%)
Demonstration of satisfactory critical analysis with some evaluation of the concepts and some discussion of strengths and weakness of
Marginal Fail (45-49%)
The writing is mainly descriptive with limited demonstration of critical analysis or evaluation.
Fail (
Poor or no analysis and evaluation of the literature.
3- Application to Clinical Practice
The marker will assess the following:
Credible links between theory and clinical practice with recommendations to change to evidence based better practice.
Demonstration of critical analysis of the evidence and how it can influence clinical practice.
Descriptors
Distincti on (70%+)
Excellent level of credible link between theory and clinical practice with a logical and sound clinically orientated conclusion and recommendations
Commendati on (60-69%)
Very good level of credible link between theory and clinical practice with a clinically orientated independent conclusion drawn.
Pass (50-59%)
Satisfactory demonstration of link between theory and clinical practice with some attempt to draw a clinically oriented conclusion.
Marginal Fail (45-49%)
Limited demonstration of link between theory and clinical practice is evident with a weak conclusion.
Fail (
There is poor link between theory and clinical practice with poor or no conclusion.
4- Reflective Writing
The marker will assess the following:
Ability to self-reflect on own practice making connections to the relevant literature.
Ability to recognize own strengths and weaknesses and to develop a plan for self-development.
Descriptors
Distincti on (70%+)
An exceptionally critical and insightful reflection on personal learning experience/practice/skills with integration with a sophisticated command of the relevant wider literature. Demonstration of ability to develop extensive and highly perceptive self-understanding and make a plan for self- development.
Commendati on (60-69%)
A clear reflection that draws on personal learning experiences/practices/skills with integration of self-reflection with a reasonable knowledge of the relevant wider literature. Demonstration of ability to plan for new actions or response based on areas of self- improvement.
Pass (50-59%)
Demonstration of acquisition of new content by reflection of learning experiences/practice/skills with some knowledge of the relevant wider literature. Demonstration of some ability to identify areas for self- improvement.
Marginal Fail (45-49%)
Largely restricted to description of experience with limited self- understandings from reflective writing.
Fail (
Limited or no ability to analyse own learning experiences/ practice/skills.
5-Presentation
The marker will assess the following:
Structure of the assignment
Coherent and appropriate referencing using Harvard referencing system
Appropriate writing style with clarity and accurate use of technical language
Correct spelling and grammar
Descriptors
Distincti on (70%)
Excellent level of writing with clarity, and appropriate structure with correct spelling and grammar is evident. There is an accurate citation of references and referencing technique.
Commendati on (60-69%)
Very good level of writing with clarity and appropriate structure with correct spelling and grammar is evident. There is correct citation of references and referencing technique.
Pass (50- 59%)
There is a satisfactory structure and level of writing, however it lacks some clarity. The work has some spelling and grammar errors. Acceptable referencing technique used with minor errors.
Marginal Fail (45-49%)
There is some logical structure and format, but it is not at the required level. The work has some errors in spelling, grammar and referencing technique.
Fail (
There is poor writing, which lacks clarity and structure with significant spelling and grammar errors. Unacceptable referencing technique is used with many inconsistent errors.
Example Answer
Part A
When discussing dental implant success and failure, it`s essential to recognize that implant success rates are generally high. However, attention is increasingly being placed on understanding the risk factors associated with implant failure to enhance clinical outcomes and optimize patient care. This essay will provide an evidence-based analysis of these risk factors, divided into patient-related, procedural, and implant-related categories, to help clinicians make informed decisions during planning and treatment.
1. Patient-Related Risk Factors
Patient factors significantly influence the success or failure of dental implants. These include:
a) Systemic Health Conditions
Diabetes : Studies have shown that uncontrolled diabetes can impede osseointegration, potentially leading to implant failure. High blood glucose levels impair wound healing and increase the risk of infection, especially in patients with poorly controlled diabetes.Osteoporosis : Reduced bone density in osteoporotic patients may affect the implant’s ability to integrate with the bone. While osteoporosis alone isn`t necessarily a contraindication, clinicians should assess bone quality before treatment.Smoking : Tobacco use has been consistently identified as a significant risk factor for implant failure. Smoking impairs blood flow and reduces the oxygen supply to the implant site, thus inhibiting healing and increasing the risk of peri-implantitis (inflammation around the implant).
b) Oral Health Status
Periodontal Disease : A history of periodontitis poses a greater risk for peri-implantitis, which can compromise the longevity of the implant. Maintaining excellent oral hygiene is crucial for these patients to avoid complications.Bruxism : Patients who suffer from bruxism (teeth grinding) may place excessive stress on the implant, leading to mechanical failure of the prosthesis or surrounding bone.
c) Age
While age alone is not a significant predictor of implant failure, older patients may present with other risk factors like reduced bone density, slower healing capacity, and chronic conditions that could impact implant success.
2. Procedural Risk Factors
The surgical technique and the expertise of the clinician play a crucial role in implant success.
a) Surgical Technique
Immediate vs. Delayed Implant Placement : Immediate placement of implants post-extraction may be advantageous in some cases, but it also carries a higher risk of complications such as infection and insufficient primary stability. Delayed placement allows more time for healing, potentially reducing risks.
Continued....
Order this Assignment Now:£169
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions
