Order this Assignment Now: £169 VALID THRU: 18-May-2024
Fundamentals of Oral Implantology (DEN847)
Programme: MSc in Advanced General Dental Practice
Module: Fundamentals of Oral Implantology (DEN847)Assignment: The assignment is 2 parts as given below:
Part A (2000 words)
Given the predictability of dental implant success, the attention of the oral implantology clinicians and researchers is moving from descriptions of implant success toward a more detailed analysis of factors associated with implant failure. In this essay, you are asked to to assess relevant literature and provide evidence-based information on the risk factors that you need to know, understand, advise patients and consider for planning and treatment provision for successful surgical placement of dental implants.
Part B (1500 words): As part of this module, you have been trained on the measures taken to maintain cross infection control during implant placement surgery. Discuss your role as a clinician and team leader to prevent cross infection in dental implant procedures. Identify the experience and skills you already have to work in such a role and the areas that you need to develop further.
Appropriate, relevant, and updated references should be cited.
Please submit Part A and B in one document with a single reference list at the end as it will be marked as one piece of work.
To be submitted electronically through VLE via Turnitin
Marking Descriptors
Your piece of work will be assessed according to the descriptors below:
1- Demonstration of Knowledge and Understanding
The marker will assess the following:
Demonstration of depth and systematic understanding in the topic and/across areas
Main topics are identified, and the key issues are addressed.
Demonstration that the students can work with theoretical/research-based knowledge at the forefront of their academic discipline.
Comprehensive understanding of techniques and methodologies applicable to the topic
High quality contemporary literature was accessed.
Descriptors
Distincti on (70%+)
Excellent level of understanding and knowledge of current ideas and controversies relating to the subject which reflects reading from a relevant and extensive list of publications.
Commendati on (60-69%)
Very good level of understanding and knowledge of the key topics and controversies relating to the subject reflecting a good level of background reading or appropriate literature.
Pass (50-59%)
Understanding of the main issues is evident with some understanding of current ideas and controversies relating to the subject reflecting a reasonable level of background reading.
Marginal Fail (45-49%)
The level of knowledge does not demonstrate Level 7 study and the accessed literature is not of the required quality.
Fail (
Poor level of understanding and knowledge with poor or no background reading.
2- Cognitive, Analytical and Evaluation Skills
The marker will assess the following:
Analysis: demonstration of critical awareness and analysis of complex or contradictory areas of knowledge, and communication of the outcomes effectively in the assignment
Synthesis: ability to synthesise information in a manner that may be innovative, utilising knowledge or processes from the forefront of the discipline/practice.
Evaluation: demonstration of a level of conceptual understanding that will allow the student critically to evaluate research and methodologies and argue alternative approaches.
Application: demonstration of initiative and originality in problem solving.
Descriptors
Distincti on (70%+)
Excellent level of critical analysis and reflection with concepts evaluated to an advanced level in a critical way. Strengths and weaknesses of the evidence presented along with their implications.
Commendati on (60-69%)
Very good level of critical analysis and reflection. Concepts are evaluated to a superior level in a critical way with strengths and weaknesses of the evidence presented.
Pass (50-59%)
Demonstration of satisfactory critical analysis with some evaluation of the concepts and some discussion of strengths and weakness of
Marginal Fail (45-49%)
The writing is mainly descriptive with limited demonstration of critical analysis or evaluation.
Fail (
Poor or no analysis and evaluation of the literature.
3- Application to Clinical Practice
The marker will assess the following:
Credible links between theory and clinical practice with recommendations to change to evidence based better practice.
Demonstration of critical analysis of the evidence and how it can influence clinical practice.
Descriptors
Distincti on (70%+)
Excellent level of credible link between theory and clinical practice with a logical and sound clinically orientated conclusion and recommendations
Commendati on (60-69%)
Very good level of credible link between theory and clinical practice with a clinically orientated independent conclusion drawn.
Pass (50-59%)
Satisfactory demonstration of link between theory and clinical practice with some attempt to draw a clinically oriented conclusion.
Marginal Fail (45-49%)
Limited demonstration of link between theory and clinical practice is evident with a weak conclusion.
Fail (
There is poor link between theory and clinical practice with poor or no conclusion.
4- Reflective Writing
The marker will assess the following:
Ability to self-reflect on own practice making connections to the relevant literature.
Ability to recognize own strengths and weaknesses and to develop a plan for self-development.
Descriptors
Distincti on (70%+)
An exceptionally critical and insightful reflection on personal learning experience/practice/skills with integration with a sophisticated command of the relevant wider literature. Demonstration of ability to develop extensive and highly perceptive self-understanding and make a plan for self- development.
Commendati on (60-69%)
A clear reflection that draws on personal learning experiences/practices/skills with integration of self-reflection with a reasonable knowledge of the relevant wider literature. Demonstration of ability to plan for new actions or response based on areas of self- improvement.
Pass (50-59%)
Demonstration of acquisition of new content by reflection of learning experiences/practice/skills with some knowledge of the relevant wider literature. Demonstration of some ability to identify areas for self- improvement.
Marginal Fail (45-49%)
Largely restricted to description of experience with limited self- understandings from reflective writing.
Fail (
Limited or no ability to analyse own learning experiences/ practice/skills.
5-Presentation
The marker will assess the following:
Structure of the assignment
Coherent and appropriate referencing using Harvard referencing system
Appropriate writing style with clarity and accurate use of technical language
Correct spelling and grammar
Descriptors
Distincti on (70%)
Excellent level of writing with clarity, and appropriate structure with correct spelling and grammar is evident. There is an accurate citation of references and referencing technique.
Commendati on (60-69%)
Very good level of writing with clarity and appropriate structure with correct spelling and grammar is evident. There is correct citation of references and referencing technique.
Pass (50- 59%)
There is a satisfactory structure and level of writing, however it lacks some clarity. The work has some spelling and grammar errors. Acceptable referencing technique used with minor errors.
Marginal Fail (45-49%)
There is some logical structure and format, but it is not at the required level. The work has some errors in spelling, grammar and referencing technique.
Fail (
There is poor writing, which lacks clarity and structure with significant spelling and grammar errors. Unacceptable referencing technique is used with many inconsistent errors.
Order this Assignment Now:£169
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions
