3
Steps to Get a Perfectly Written Assignment
One
Click “order this assignment now”
Two
Choose your deadline & pay for it
Three
Get custom-written work ready for submission

Custom-Written, AI & Plagiarism-Free with Passing "Guaranteed"

money back guarantee
Assignment Briefs 10-05-2023

Demonstrate a systematic and critical understanding of the integration of research into health and social care practice.

Academic Year 2023-2024

Assignment Brief - Undergraduate Academic Year 2023-2024 (September 2023 & February 2024 Semesters)

ACADEMIC YEAR

SEMESTER

2023-24

Yearlong

 

 

SUBJECT

 

Health and Social Care

 

 

 

PROGRAMME(S)

 

BSc (Hons) Health and Social Care

 

 

LEVEL

MODULE CODE

MODULE TITLE

CREDITS

ECTS CREDITS

6

HSC60220

Dissertation

30

15

 

COMPONENT

WEIGHTING

UNISTATS CATEGORY

ASSIGNMENT TYPE

1

OF

1

100%

Coursework

Dissertation

 

ANONYMOUS MARKING

This assignment will be marked anonymously

No

             

 

TASK DESCRIPTION

You will complete a research project which will focus on a topic related to health and social care practice. This will be confirmed with your supervisor and will have acquired the relevant ethical approach. Please see the Dissertation Handbook and VLE for additional information and support.

The following sections must be included

  • Title
  • Acknowledgements
  • Abstract
  • Introduction – why you have chosen this and how it relates to practice within health and social care
  • Research question (if you have one)
  • Aim and objectives (around 3)
  • Background and supporting rationale
  • Critical overview of current literature, include a basic search strategy
  • Research methodology
  • Methods of data collection: tools, sampling strategy, etc
  • Ethical Considerations
  • Data analysis
  • Findings

TASK DESCRIPTION

  • Discussion
  • Recommendations
  • Conclusion

You do need to include your approved ethics form at this submission

 

MODULE OUTCOMES

  1. Demonstrate a systematic and critical understanding of the integration of research into health and social care practice.
  2. Appreciate the uncertainty and ambiguity of research knowledge when applied to health and social care practice.
  3. Demonstrate a practical understanding of research methodologies and techniques which will inform their own research practice and that of others within health and social care.
  4. Describe and critique ethical and value-based issues when involved in decision making process within the administration, and interpretation of research outcomes into the practice setting.

 

WORD COUNT

10,000 words

 

 

SUBMISSION METHOD

Turnitin - VLE

 

DATE/TIME OF SUBMISSION

*Please see guidance below on application of late penalties*

Final Submission date:  10 – 13 June 2024, 4pm

Late Submission date:   13 – 14 June 2024, 4pm

Resubmission deadline - To be announced

 

DATE/TIME OF SUBMISSION IF EXTENSION AUTHORISED

To be announced

 

SUBMISSION GUIDANCE

Your submission folder will open 5 days before the submission deadline and we recommend you take advantage of the originality reports generated after your submission. You can resubmit your file up until the deadline. You can submit as many times as you like. Each resubmission will overwrite the previous one, and your tutor will only ever see the last submission. If you submit through Turnitin YOU MUST ONLY SUBMIT ONE FILE (if you have several documents, please combine them into one to upload). You can submit an electronic copy through Turnitin in one of the following formats: Microsoft Word (DOC or DOCX) or PDF. You must have twenty words on your first page of your submission to avoid a Turnitin error or submit your work as a PDF to avoid this. Please allow

sufficient time for your submission to upload, large files with audio/video take longer. Please

SUBMISSION GUIDANCE

ensure you review your submission after upload. Make sure you download and keep your digital receipt as proof of submission. If you submit using a Blackboard submission you will not receive a receipt, but you will see a ‘Success’ notice on your screen which you can screenshot and save as evidence of submission.

 

RETURN DATE

To be announced

FEEDBACK METHOD

Turnitin - VLE

FEEDBACK

Feedback will be available on the VLE. If you have any specific questions relating to the comments on the feedback sheet, please contact your Module Tutor and arrange a tutorial with them. Tutor details are provided in the ‘Contact Details’ section on Blackboard.


MARK SCHEME

GUIDANCE AND SUPPORT

You must ensure that you familiarise yourself with the Code of Practice for the Assessment for Students which governs all Bishop Grosseteste University assessments:- Code of Practice for the Assessment for Students.

COMPLETING YOUR ASSIGNMENT

Your tutor will be available to answer any questions you have regarding the assignment and you should check their availability to access their support. Demonstrate a systematic and critical understanding of the integration of research into health and social care practice.

You can get support with your academic practice from Learning Development. This support includes online resources, workshops, drop-in sessions and one to one appointments. You can also get support for any technical aspects of your submission from Digital Learning. Please visit the CELT (Centre for Enhancement in Learning and Teaching) course on Blackboard to find out more. Additional help is available from the CELT Centre.

Please also make use of support available from the Library, either through their Blackboard and LibGuides sites or by visiting the Cornerstone building.

To get the most from the support available, please access it at the earliest opportunity.

REFERENCING

The University uses APA (American Psychological Association) 7th as its referencing standard as laid out in the Handbook for Written Coursework (APA7th). We strongly recommend you familiarise yourself with this document which can be found here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13E5eppxk1iodiZGHHaqgyyoFloENq4Xl/view?usp=sharing.

PLAGIARISM

Your attention is drawn to the University’s Code of Practice for Academic Misconduct covering plagiarism. Penalties for work found to be plagiarised can be severe and can include the withdrawal of the right to resubmit work and/or termination of studies. On submission of the assignment, you will be required to declare that the work is your own and that all sources have been properly acknowledged.

ORIGINALITY CHECK

The University uses originality software to check student work. Occasionally, requests will be received from other institutions to see student work where the software has noted potential high levels of duplication. In these instances, the University reserves the right to share the work anonymously with the institution concerned.

PRESENTATION OF WORK

General information on layout, referencing and presentation can be found in the Handbook for Written Coursework (APA7th). Please see: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13E5eppxk1iodiZGHHaqgyyoFloENq4Xl/view?usp=sharing

Unless your assignment is submitted by the deadline indicated above, penalties will be applied in accordance with the Code of Practice for the Assessment of Students. Please Note: if work is submitted more than 24 hours after the deadline, it will receive a mark of zero.

If you require any advice or support with making your submission please contact the Digital Learning Team at digitallearning@bishopg.ac.uk or by calling 01522 563866.

EXTENSIONS

All requests for extensions must be submitted to Registry on the e-form available here https://sharepoint.bishopg.ac.uk/eforms/_layouts/15/FormServer.aspx?XsnLocation=https://sharepoint. bishopg.ac.uk/eforms/assignmentextend/Forms/template.xsn&SaveLocation=https%3A%2F%2Fsharepoi nt%2Ebishopg%2Eac%2Euk%2Feforms%2Fassignmentextend&ClientInstalled=false&DefaultItemOpen=0 &OpenIn=Browser at least 1 working day BEFORE the published deadline. Such requests must be submitted with corroborating evidence if appropriate. Demonstrate a systematic and critical understanding of the integration of research into health and social care practice.

EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Following the date of submission, requests may be made for the Board of Examiners to take extenuating circumstances for non-submission into account. All such requests must be made in accordance with the Code of Practice for Extenuating Circumstances and be submitted on the Extenuating Circumstance Request Form. They must be accompanied by corroborating evidence. Further guidance is available at the end of the standard pro-forma.

Mark Range

Understanding of Issues

Development of theme/argument

Selection and Analysis of Sources

Quality of Communication

90-100

An extremely confident and perceptive account, showing great assurance when discussing the issues. An account which offers sustained, high quality independent insights into the issues.

Very considerable evidence of independent thinking in a coherent, wellformulated structure, which draws key strands together making a coherent whole. Writing which is likely to show a very considerable degree of originality in its argument throughout.

Exceptionally scholarly use and evaluation of a wide range of sources. Very considerable evidence of originality in obtaining, handling and deploying a wide range of sources and in the critical judgements they support.

Excellent communication, containing no or almost no errors, and demonstrating very considerable stylistic elegance, sustained use of an appropriate register and great precision.

 

80-89

A very confident

Considerable

Very scholarly use and

Communication of

 

and perceptive

evidence of

evaluation of a wide

very high quality,

 

account, showing

independent thinking

range of sources.

containing almost no

 

great assurance

in a coherent,

Considerable evidence

errors, and showing

 

when discussing

wellformulated

of originality in

considerable stylistic

 

the issues. An

structure, which draws

obtaining, handling and

elegance, use of an

 

account which

key strands together

deploying sources and

appropriate register

 

offers a number

making a coherent

in the critical

and great precision.

 

of independent

whole. Writing which is

judgements they

 

 

and good quality

likely to show some

support.

 

 

insights into the

originality in its

 

 

 

issues.

argument.

 

 

70-79

A confident and

Independent thinking

Scholarly use and

Communication of

 

perceptive

in a coherent,

evaluation of sources.

high quality showing

 

account, showing

wellformulated

An element of

elegance of style,

 

a sure

structure, which draws

originality employed in

awareness of

 

understanding of

key strands together.

critical judgements.

audience and

 

issues and

 

 

precision of phrasing.

 

independent

 

 

 

 

insight into them.

 

 

 

60-69

A clear and

Clear evidence of

Critical judgement

A written style which

 

confident

independent and

exercised in the

contributes to the

 

understanding of

sustained thinking in

selection, analysis and

clear and fluent

 

relevant issues

the construction of an

evaluation of primary

communication of

 

and questions.

argument.

and secondary sources

meaning. Generally

 

 

 

based on careful

appropriate for the

 

 

 

research.

audience, generally

 

 

 

 

precise.

50-59

A generally

An essay which is

Competent description

Few inconsistencies

 

sound

sound and coherent, if

and analysis of primary

in written style which

 

understanding of

not decisively focused

and secondary sources

impair

 

relevant issues

or argued. Not full of

with clear indications of

communication.

 

and questions.

insight.

the ability to select and

Possibly a few

 

 

 

evaluate evidence.

difficulties with

 

 

 

 

register. Some

 

 

 

 

imprecision in

 

 

 

 

phrasing.

40-49

Some understanding of

A mainly coherently structured discussion

Some ability to select and analyse sources

but an account where

Some inconsistencies in written style which

impair

 

relevant issues

but not adequately

the balance is towards

communication.

and questions.

sustained.

the descriptive and

Some difficulties with

 

 

remains over-reliant on

register. A number of

 

 

secondary sources.

problems with

 

 

 

phrasing.

35-39

A limited

Limited evidence of the

Heavy reliance on a

Many inconsistencies

 

understanding of

ability to provide a

limited range of sources

and inaccuracies

 

relevant issues

coherent structure for

with little interpretation

which impair

 

and questions

discussion.

or analysis. A largely

communication;

 

 

 

descriptive or derivative

inappropriate register

 

 

 

account.

for audience.

30-34

A very limited understanding of relevant issues and questions.

Very limited evidence of the ability to provide a coherent structure for discussion.

Limited evidence of use of sources. Sources are likely to be inappropriate or used in an ineffective way.

Very many inconsistencies and inaccuracies which impair communication; inappropriate register for audience.

20-29

An extremely limited understanding of relevant issues and questions.

Extremely limited evidence of the ability to provide a coherent structure for discussion.

Very limited evidence of use of sources.

Sources are likely to be inappropriate or used in an ineffective way.

Communication is disjointed, with poor grammar making it largely incoherent.

10-19

Very slight understanding of relevant issues and questions.

Very slight evidence of ability to provide a coherent structure for discussion.

Very slight evidence of sources.

Very slight evidence of communication.

0-9

No or almost no understanding of relevant issues and questions.

No or almost no evidence of the ability to provide a coherent structure for discussion

No or almost no evidence of sources.

No or almost no evidence of communication.

 

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions

Our Giveaways

Plagiarism Report

for £20 Free

Formatting

for £12 Free

Title page

for £10 Free

Bibliography

for £18 Free

Outline

for £9 Free

Limitless Amendments

for £14 Free

Get all these features for
£83.00 FREE

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

Have a look at our samples which are written by our professional writers to give you an insight into how your work is going to look like. We have added some essays, coursework, assignments as well as dissertations.

View Our Samples

May Wed 2024

1.1 Describe each stage in the graduated

SENCO - Assignment 5 You must use the following template to structure your assi...

May Wed 2024

2.1 Explain the needs of children with E

SENCO – Assignment 6 Your name: Group:  Date: ...

May Wed 2024

3.1 Describe the principles underpinning

EYSENCO – Assignment 7 You must use the following template to structure y...