3
Steps to Get a Perfectly Written Assignment
One
Click “order this assignment now”
Two
Choose your deadline & pay for it
Three
Get custom-written work ready for submission

Custom-Written, AI & Plagiarism-Free with Passing "Guaranteed"

money back guarantee
Assignment Briefs 10-05-2023

Critically evaluate service users’ expectations of provision and delivery of Health and Social Care, and the impact this has on practice.

Assignment Brief - Undergraduate Academic Year 2023-2024 (September 2023 Semester)

ACADEMIC YEAR

SEMESTER

2023-24

1

 

 

SUBJECT

 

Health and Social Care

 

 

 

PROGRAMME(S)

 

BSc (Hons) Health and Social Care

 

 

LEVEL

MODULE CODE

MODULE TITLE

CREDITS

ECTS CREDITS

6

HSC60120

Individuality and Diversity – Meeting Everyone’s Needs

30

15

COMPONENT

WEIGHTING

UNISTATS CATEGORY

ASSIGNMENT TYPE

2

OF

2

60%

Coursework

Essay

 

ANONYMOUS MARKING

This assignment will be marked anonymously

YES

             

TASK DESCRIPTION

Write a 3,000-word essay

•Identify an area of health and social care practice you are interested in

•Using knowledge of local, national, and global service provision, critically analyse service users’ expectations.

•Critically discuss strategies that practitioners utilise to manage these expectations.

MODULE OUTCOMES

  1. Critically evaluate service users’ expectations of provision and delivery of Health and Social Care, and the impact this has on practice.
  2. Critically analyse a range of strategies for managing service users’ expectations whilst appreciating the diversity of needs, from a local, national and global perspective.

WORD COUNT

3000

If you submit an assignment which exceeds the prescribed word or time limit, marking will cease at the point at which the limit has been exceeded by a margin of 10% and the mark will be awarded based on the extent to which the criteria for assessment have been met up to that point.

SUBMISSION METHOD

Turnitin

DATE/TIME OF SUBMISSION

*Please see guidance below on application of late penalties*

Final Submission date: 08 – 11 Jan 2024, 4pm

Late Submission date: 11 – 12 Jan 2024, 4pm Resubmission deadline - To be announced

 

DATE/TIME OF SUBMISSION IF EXTENSION AUTHORISED

To be announced

SUBMISSION GUIDANCE

Your submission folder will open 5 days before the submission deadline and we recommend you take advantage of the originality reports generated after your submission. You can resubmit your file up until the deadline. You can submit as many times as you like. Each resubmission will overwrite the previous one, and your tutor will only ever see the last submission. If you submit through Turnitin YOU MUST ONLY SUBMIT ONE FILE (if you have several documents, please combine them into one to upload). You can submit an electronic copy through Turnitin in one of the following formats: Microsoft Word (DOC or DOCX) or PDF. You must have twenty words on your first page of your submission to avoid a Turnitin error or submit your work as a PDF to avoid this. Please allow sufficient time for your submission to upload, large files with audio/video take longer. Please ensure you review your submission after upload. Make sure you download and keep your digital receipt as proof of submission. If you submit using a Blackboard submission you will not receive a receipt, but you will see a ‘Success’ notice on your screen which you can screenshot and save as evidence of submission.

RETURN DATE

To be announced

FEEDBACK METHOD

Turnitin - VLE

 

FEEDBACK

Feedback will be available on the VLE. If you have any specific questions relating to the comments on the feedback sheet, please contact your Module Tutor and arrange a tutorial with them. Tutor details are provided in the ‘Contact Details’ section on Blackboard.

Marking Scheme

The mark scheme (found at the end of this assignment brief) is used in conjunction with the module outcomes (above) to award appropriate marks for the assignment.

All the main criteria headings are equally weighted and assessed, but a single overall mark is awarded.

You will receive comments under the main criteria headings, which will help you to identify your strengths and weaknesses in the different areas.

All marks are subject to the confirmation of the Board of Examiners

GUIDANCE AND SUPPORT

You must ensure that you familiarise yourself with the Code of Practice for the Assessment for Students which governs all Bishop Grosseteste University assessments:- Code of Practice for the Assessment for Students.

COMPLETING YOUR ASSIGNMENT

Your tutor will be available to answer any questions you have regarding the assignment and you should check their availability to access their support.

You can get support with your academic practice from Learning Development. This support includes online resources, workshops, drop-in sessions and one to one appointments. You can also get support for any technical aspects of your submission from Digital Learning. Please visit the CELT (Centre for Enhancement in Learning and Teaching) course on Blackboard to find out more. Additional help is available from the CELT Centre.

Please also make use of support available from the Library, either through their Blackboard and LibGuides sites or by visiting the Cornerstone building.

To get the most from the support available, please access it at the earliest opportunity.

REFERENCING

The University uses APA (American Psychological Association) 7th as its referencing standard as laid out in the Handbook for Written Coursework (APA7th). We strongly recommend you familiarise yourself with this document which can be found here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13E5eppxk1iodiZGHHaqgyyoFloENq4Xl/view?usp=sharing.

PLAGIARISM

Your attention is drawn to the University’s Code of Practice for Academic Misconduct covering plagiarism. Penalties for work found to be plagiarised can be severe and can include the withdrawal of the right to resubmit work and/or termination of studies. On submission of the assignment, you will be required to declare that the work is your own and that all sources have been properly acknowledged.

ORIGINALITY CHECK

The University uses originality software to check student work. Occasionally, requests will be received from other institutions to see student work where the software has noted potential high levels of duplication. In these instances, the University reserves the right to share the work anonymously with the institution concerned.

PRESENTATION OF WORK

General information on layout, referencing and presentation can be found in the Handbook for Written Coursework (APA7th). Please see: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13E5eppxk1iodiZGHHaqgyyoFloENq4Xl/view?usp=sharing

Unless your assignment is submitted by the deadline indicated above, penalties will be applied in accordance with the Code of Practice for the Assessment of Students. Please Note: if work is submitted more than 24 hours after the deadline, it will receive a mark of zero.

If you require any advice or support with making your submission please contact the Digital Learning Team at digitallearning@bishopg.ac.uk or by calling 01522 563866.

EXTENSIONS

All requests for extensions must be submitted to Registry on the e-form available here https://sharepoint.bishopg.ac.uk/eforms/_layouts/15/FormServer.aspx?XsnLocation=https://sharepoint. bishopg.ac.uk/eforms/assignmentextend/Forms/template.xsn&SaveLocation=https%3A%2F%2Fsharepoi nt%2Ebishopg%2Eac%2Euk%2Feforms%2Fassignmentextend&ClientInstalled=false&DefaultItemOpen=0 &OpenIn=Browser at least 1 working day BEFORE the published deadline. Such requests must be submitted with corroborating evidence if appropriate. Individuality and Diversity

EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Following the date of submission, requests may be made for the Board of Examiners to take extenuating circumstances for non-submission into account. All such requests must be made in accordance with the Code of Practice for Extenuating Circumstances and be submitted on the Extenuating Circumstance Request Form. They must be accompanied by corroborating evidence. Further guidance is available at the end of the standard pro-format

Mark Range

Understanding of Issues

Development of theme/argument

Selection and Analysis of Sources

Quality of Communication

90-100

An extremely confident and perceptive account, showing great assurance when discussing the issues. An account, which offers sustained, high quality independent insights into the issues.

Very considerable evidence of independent thinking in a coherent, wellformulated structure, which draws key strands together making a coherent whole. Writing which is likely to show a very considerable degree of originality in its argument throughout.

Exceptionally scholarly use and evaluation of a wide range of sources.

Very considerable evidence of originality in obtaining, handling and deploying a wide range of sources and in the critical judgements they support.

Excellent communication, containing no or almost no errors, and demonstrating very considerable stylistic elegance, sustained use of  an appropriate register and great precision.

80-89

A very confident and perceptive account, showing

Considerable evidence of independent thinking in a coherent,

Very scholarly use and evaluation of a wide range of

Communication of very high quality, containing almost no

 

 

great assurance

well-formulated structure, which draws key strands together making a coherent whole.

Writing which is likely to show some originality in its

argument.

sources. Considerable

errors, and showing

when discussing the

evidence of originality

considerable stylistic

issues. An account,

in obtaining, handling

elegance, use of an

which offers several

and deploying

appropriate register

independent and

sources and in the

and great precision.

good quality insights

critical judgements

 

into the issues.

they support.

 

70-79

A confident and

Independent thinking

Scholarly use and evaluation of sources. An element of originality employed in critical judgements.

Communication of

 

perceptive account,

in a coherent,

high-quality showing

 

showing a sure

wellformulated

elegance of style,

 

understanding of

structure, which draws

awareness of

 

issues and

key strands together.

audience and

 

independent insight

 

precision of phrasing.

 

into them.

 

 

60-69

A clear and

Clear evidence of

Critical judgement

A written style, which

 

confident

independent and

exercised in the

contributes to the

 

understanding of

sustained thinking in

selection, analysis and

clear and fluent

 

relevant issues and

the construction of an

evaluation of primary

communication of

 

questions.

argument.

and secondary

meaning. Generally

 

 

 

sources based on

appropriate for the

 

 

 

careful research.

audience, generally

 

 

 

 

precise.

50-59

A generally sound

An essay, which is

Competent

Few inconsistencies

 

understanding of

sound and coherent, if

description and

in written style,

 

relevant issues and

not decisively, focused

analysis of primary

which impair

 

questions.

or argued. Not full of

and secondary

communication.

 

 

insight.

sources with clear

Possibly a few

 

 

 

indications of the

difficulties with

 

 

 

ability to select and

register. Some

 

 

 

evaluate evidence.

imprecisions in

 

 

 

 

phrasing.

 

40-49

Some understanding of relevant issues and questions.

A mainly coherently structured discussion but not adequately sustained.

Some ability to select and analyse sources but an account where the balance is towards the descriptive and remains over-reliant on secondary sources.

Some inconsistencies in written style, which                      impair communication.

Some difficulties with register. A  number of problems with phrasing.

35-39

A limited

Limited evidence of

Heavy reliance on a

Many

 

understanding of

the ability to provide a

limited range of

inconsistencies and

 

relevant issues and

coherent structure for

sources with little

inaccuracies, which

 

questions

discussion.

interpretation or

impair

 

 

 

analysis. A largely

communication;

 

 

 

descriptive or

inappropriate

 

 

 

derivative account.

register for audience.

30-34

A very limited

Very limited evidence

Limited evidence of

Very many

 

understanding of

of the ability to

use of sources.

inconsistencies and

 

relevant issues and

provide a coherent

Sources are likely to

inaccuracies, which

 

questions.

structure for

be inappropriate or

impair

 

 

discussion.

 

communication;

 

 

 

used in an ineffective way.

inappropriate register for audience.

20-29

An extremely limited understanding of relevant issues and

questions.

Extremely limited evidence of the ability to provide a coherent structure for

Very limited evidence of use of sources.

Sources are likely to

be inappropriate or

Communication is disjointed, with poor grammar making it

largely incoherent.

 

 

discussion.

used in an ineffective

 

 

 

 

way.

 

10-19

Very slight understanding of relevant issues and questions.

Very slight evidence of ability to provide a coherent structure for discussion.

Very slight evidence of sources.

Very slight evidence of communication.

0-9

No or almost no

No or almost no evidence of the ability to provide a coherent structure for discussion

No or almost no

No or almost no

 

understanding of

evidence of sources.

evidence of

 

relevant issues and

 

communication.

 

questions.

 

 

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions

Our Giveaways

Plagiarism Report

for £20 Free

Formatting

for £12 Free

Title page

for £10 Free

Bibliography

for £18 Free

Outline

for £9 Free

Limitless Amendments

for £14 Free

Get all these features for
£83.00 FREE

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

Have a look at our samples which are written by our professional writers to give you an insight into how your work is going to look like. We have added some essays, coursework, assignments as well as dissertations.

View Our Samples

May Wed 2024

1.1 Describe each stage in the graduated

SENCO - Assignment 5 You must use the following template to structure your assi...

May Wed 2024

2.1 Explain the needs of children with E

SENCO – Assignment 6 Your name: Group:  Date: ...

May Wed 2024

3.1 Describe the principles underpinning

EYSENCO – Assignment 7 You must use the following template to structure y...