Order this Assignment Now: £169 VALID THRU: 18-May-2024
Critically evaluate service users’ expectations of provision and delivery of Health and Social Care, and the impact this has on practice.
Assignment Brief - Undergraduate Academic Year 2023-2024 (September 2023 Semester)
ACADEMIC YEAR
SEMESTER
2023-24
1
SUBJECT
Health and Social Care
PROGRAMME(S)
BSc (Hons) Health and Social Care
LEVEL
MODULE CODE
MODULE TITLE
CREDITS
ECTS CREDITS
6
HSC60120
Individuality and Diversity – Meeting Everyone’s Needs
30
15
COMPONENT
WEIGHTING
UNISTATS CATEGORY
ASSIGNMENT TYPE
2
OF
2
60%
Coursework
Essay
ANONYMOUS MARKING
This assignment will be marked anonymously
YES
TASK DESCRIPTION
Write a 3,000-word essay
•Identify an area of health and social care practice you are interested in
•Using knowledge of local, national, and global service provision, critically analyse service users’ expectations.
•Critically discuss strategies that practitioners utilise to manage these expectations.
MODULE OUTCOMES
Critically evaluate service users’ expectations of provision and delivery of Health and Social Care, and the impact this has on practice.
Critically analyse a range of strategies for managing service users’ expectations whilst appreciating the diversity of needs, from a local, national and global perspective.
If you submit an assignment which exceeds the prescribed word or time limit, marking will cease at the point at which the limit has been exceeded by a margin of 10% and the mark will be awarded based on the extent to which the criteria for assessment have been met up to that point.
SUBMISSION METHOD
Turnitin
DATE/TIME OF SUBMISSION
*Please see guidance below on application of late penalties*
Final Submission date: 08 – 11 Jan 2024, 4pm
Late Submission date: 11 – 12 Jan 2024, 4pm Resubmission deadline - To be announced
DATE/TIME OF SUBMISSION IF EXTENSION AUTHORISED
To be announced
SUBMISSION GUIDANCE
Your submission folder will open 5 days before the submission deadline and we recommend you take advantage of the originality reports generated after your submission. You can resubmit your file up until the deadline. You can submit as many times as you like. Each resubmission will overwrite the previous one, and your tutor will only ever see the last submission. If you submit through Turnitin YOU MUST ONLY SUBMIT ONE FILE (if you have several documents, please combine them into one to upload). You can submit an electronic copy through Turnitin in one of the following formats: Microsoft Word (DOC or DOCX) or PDF. You must have twenty words on your first page of your submission to avoid a Turnitin error or submit your work as a PDF to avoid this. Please allow sufficient time for your submission to upload, large files with audio/video take longer. Please ensure you review your submission after upload. Make sure you download and keep your digital receipt as proof of submission. If you submit using a Blackboard submission you will not receive a receipt, but you will see a ‘Success’ notice on your screen which you can screenshot and save as evidence of submission.
RETURN DATE
To be announced
FEEDBACK METHOD
Turnitin - VLE
FEEDBACK
Feedback will be available on the VLE. If you have any specific questions relating to the comments on the feedback sheet, please contact your Module Tutor and arrange a tutorial with them. Tutor details are provided in the ‘Contact Details’ section on Blackboard.
Marking Scheme
The mark scheme (found at the end of this assignment brief) is used in conjunction with the module outcomes (above) to award appropriate marks for the assignment.
All the main criteria headings are equally weighted and assessed, but a single overall mark is awarded.
You will receive comments under the main criteria headings, which will help you to identify your strengths and weaknesses in the different areas.
All marks are subject to the confirmation of the Board of Examiners
GUIDANCE AND SUPPORT
You must ensure that you familiarise yourself with the Code of Practice for the Assessment for Students which governs all Bishop Grosseteste University assessments:- Code of Practice fo r the Assessment for Students.
COMPLETING YOUR ASSIGNMENT Your tutor will be available to answer any questions you have regarding the assignment and you should check their availability to access their support.
You can get support with your academic practice from Learning Development. This support includes online resources, workshops, drop-in sessions and one to one appointments. You can also get support for any technical aspects of your submission from Digital Learning. Please visit the CELT (Centre for Enhancement in Learning and Teaching) course on Blackboard to find out more. Additional help is available from the CELT Centre.
Please also make use of support available from the Library, either through their Blackboard and LibGuides sites or by visiting the Cornerstone building.
To get the most from the support available, please access it at the earliest opportunity. REFERENCING
The University uses APA (American Psychological Association) 7th as its referencing standard as laid out in the Handbook for Written Coursework (APA7th). We strongly recommend you familiarise yourself with this document which can be found here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13E5eppxk1iodiZGHHaqgyyoFloENq4Xl/view?usp=sharing .
PLAGIARISM Your attention is drawn to the University’s Code of Practice for Academic Misconduct
ORIGINALITY CHECK The University uses originality software to check student work. Occasionally, requests will be received from other institutions to see student work where the software has noted potential high levels of duplication. In these instances, the University reserves the right to share the work anonymously with the institution concerned.
PRESENTATION OF WORK General information on layout, referencing and presentation can be found in the Handbook for Written Coursework (APA7th) . Please see: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13E5eppxk1iodiZGHHaqgyyoFloENq4Xl/view?usp=sharing
Unless your assignment is submitted by the deadline indicated above, penalties will be applied in accordance with the Code of Practice for the Assessment of Students . Please Note:
If you require any advice or support with making your submission please contact the Digital Learning Team at digitallearning@bishopg.ac.uk or by calling 01522 563866.
EXTENSIONS All requests for extensions must be submitted to Registry on the e-form available here https://sharepoint.bishopg.ac.uk/eforms/_layouts/15/FormServer.aspx?XsnLocation=https://sharepoint. bishopg.ac.uk/eforms/assignmentextend/Forms/template.xsn&SaveLocation=https%3A%2F%2Fsharepoi nt%2Ebishopg%2Eac%2Euk%2Feforms%2Fassignmentextend&ClientInstalled=false&DefaultItemOpen=0 &OpenIn=Browser at least 1 working day BEFORE the published deadline. Such requests must be submitted with corroborating evidence if appropriate. Individuality and Diversity
EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES Following the date of submission, requests may be made for the Board of Examiners to take extenuating circumstances for non-submission into account. All such requests must be made in accordance with the Code of Practice for Extenuating Circumstances Extenuating Circumstance Request Form . They must be accompanied by corroborating evidence. Further guidance is available at the end of the standard pro-format
Mark Range
Understanding of Issues
Development of theme/argument
Selection and Analysis of Sources
Quality of Communication
90-100
An extremely confident and perceptive account, showing great assurance when discussing the issues. An account, which offers sustained, high quality independent insights into the issues.
Very considerable evidence of independent thinking in a coherent, wellformulated structure, which draws key strands together making a coherent whole. Writing which is likely to show a very considerable degree of originality in its argument throughout.
Exceptionally scholarly use and evaluation of a wide range of sources.
Very considerable evidence of originality in obtaining, handling and deploying a wide range of sources and in the critical judgements they support.
Excellent communication, containing no or almost no errors, and demonstrating very considerable stylistic elegance, sustained use of an appropriate register and great precision.
80-89
A very confident and perceptive account, showing
Considerable evidence of independent thinking in a coherent,
Very scholarly use and evaluation of a wide range of
Communication of very high quality, containing almost no
great assurance
well-formulated structure, which draws key strands together making a coherent whole.
Writing which is likely to show some originality in its
argument.
sources. Considerable
errors, and showing
when discussing the
evidence of originality
considerable stylistic
issues. An account,
in obtaining, handling
elegance, use of an
which offers several
and deploying
appropriate register
independent and
sources and in the
and great precision.
good quality insights
critical judgements
into the issues.
they support.
70-79
A confident and
Independent thinking
Scholarly use and evaluation of sources. An element of originality employed in critical judgements.
Communication of
perceptive account,
in a coherent,
high-quality showing
showing a sure
wellformulated
elegance of style,
understanding of
structure, which draws
awareness of
issues and
key strands together.
audience and
independent insight
precision of phrasing.
into them.
60-69
A clear and
Clear evidence of
Critical judgement
A written style, which
confident
independent and
exercised in the
contributes to the
understanding of
sustained thinking in
selection, analysis and
clear and fluent
relevant issues and
the construction of an
evaluation of primary
communication of
questions.
argument.
and secondary
meaning. Generally
sources based on
appropriate for the
careful research.
audience, generally
precise.
50-59
A generally sound
An essay, which is
Competent
Few inconsistencies
understanding of
sound and coherent, if
description and
in written style,
relevant issues and
not decisively, focused
analysis of primary
which impair
questions.
or argued. Not full of
and secondary
communication.
insight.
sources with clear
Possibly a few
indications of the
difficulties with
ability to select and
register. Some
evaluate evidence.
imprecisions in
phrasing.
40-49
Some understanding of relevant issues and questions.
A mainly coherently structured discussion but not adequately sustained.
Some ability to select and analyse sources but an account where the balance is towards the descriptive and remains over-reliant on secondary sources.
Some inconsistencies in written style, which impair communication.
Some difficulties with register. A number of problems with phrasing.
35-39
A limited
Limited evidence of
Heavy reliance on a
Many
understanding of
the ability to provide a
limited range of
inconsistencies and
relevant issues and
coherent structure for
sources with little
inaccuracies, which
questions
discussion.
interpretation or
impair
analysis. A largely
communication;
descriptive or
inappropriate
derivative account.
register for audience.
30-34
A very limited
Very limited evidence
Limited evidence of
Very many
understanding of
of the ability to
use of sources.
inconsistencies and
relevant issues and
provide a coherent
Sources are likely to
inaccuracies, which
questions.
structure for
be inappropriate or
impair
discussion.
communication;
used in an ineffective way.
inappropriate register for audience.
20-29
An extremely limited understanding of relevant issues and
questions.
Extremely limited evidence of the ability to provide a coherent structure for
Very limited evidence of use of sources.
Sources are likely to
be inappropriate or
Communication is disjointed, with poor grammar making it
largely incoherent.
discussion.
used in an ineffective
way.
10-19
Very slight understanding of relevant issues and questions.
Very slight evidence of ability to provide a coherent structure for discussion.
Very slight evidence of sources.
Very slight evidence of communication.
0-9
No or almost no
No or almost no evidence of the ability to provide a coherent structure for discussion
No or almost no
No or almost no
understanding of
evidence of sources.
evidence of
relevant issues and
communication.
questions.
Order this Assignment Now:£169
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions
