|
Criterion 1 (20%): Introduction
|
The aim of the report is made clear. Explains clearly the organisation and its international/global strategic goals. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of IHRM, including organisational strategic drivers, approaches to internationalisation, and HR processes. Demonstrates an exceptional high level of research work. Outstanding presentation of material that is grounded in current research and best practice.
|
The aim of the report is made clear. Explains clearly the organisation and its international/global strategic goals. Demonstrates an excellent understanding of IHRM, including organisational strategic drivers, approaches to internationalisation, and HR processes. Extensive research work. Excellent presentation of material that is grounded in current research and best practice.
|
Includes a clear statement of the aim of the report. Contains a thoughtful explanation of the organisation and its international/global strategic goals. Demonstrates a very good understanding of IHRM, including organisational strategic drivers, approaches to internationalisation, and HR processes. Demonstrates a very good level of research work.
Very good presentation of material that is mostly grounded in current research and best practice.
|
Includes a clear statement of the aim of the report. Contains a good explanation of the organisation and its international/global strategic goals. Demonstrates a good understanding of IHRM, including organisational strategic drivers, approaches to internationalisation, and HR processes. Demonstrates a good level of research work.
Good presentation of material that is mostly grounded in current research and best practice.
|
Includes a reasonable statement of the aim of the report. Contains a satisfactory explanation of the organisation and its international/global strategic goals. Demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of IHRM, including organisational strategic drivers, approaches to internationalisation, and HR processes. Demonstrates a satisfactory level of research work. Satisfactory presentation of material that is mostly grounded in current research and best practice.
|
The aim of the report is not fully clear. Contains an limited explanation of the organisation and its international/global strategic goals. Demonstrates a limited understanding of IHRM, including organisational strategic drivers, approaches to internationalisation, and HR processes. Demonstrates limited research work. Basic presentation of material that is mostly grounded in current research and best practice.
|
Introduction lacks clear focus and does not state the aim of the report. Demonstrates some understanding of IHRM issues, but the introduction is wholly descriptive. Resources are irrelevant, muddled or inappropriate.
|
Does not demonstrate an understanding of IHRM topics or of the assignment tasks.
Introduction is muddled and does not state the aim of the report. No reliable resources used.
|
Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.
|
|
Criterion 2 (30%):
International assignment
|
Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the types of international assignments. The proposed type of international assignment is clearly linked to the organisation’s strategic goal identified in the introduction. Their link is exceptionally well justified.
Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the proposed international assignment, including its characteristics, advantages and disadvantages for both organisations and employees. Demonstrates an exceptional high level of research work. Outstanding presentation of material that is grounded in current research and best practice.
|
Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the types of international assignments. The proposed type of international assignment is clearly linked to the organisation’s strategic goal identified in the introduction. Their link is very well justified. Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the proposed international assignment, including its characteristics, advantages and disadvantages for both organisations and employees. Extensive research work. Excellent presentation of material that is grounded in current research and best practice.
|
Demonstrates a very good understanding of the range and type of international assignments. The proposed international assignment is clearly linked to the type of organisation`s strategic goal identified in the introduction. Their link is thoughtfully justified. Demonstrates a very good understanding of the proposed international assignment, including its characteristics, advantages and disadvantages for both organisations and employees. Demonstrates a very good level of research work. Very good presentation of material that is mostly grounded in current research and best practice.
|
Demonstrates a good understanding of the range and type of international assignments. The proposed international assignment is linked to the type of organisation`s strategic goal identified in the introduction. Their link is justified.
Demonstrates a good understanding of the proposed international assignment, including its characteristics, advantages and disadvantages for both organisations and employees. Demonstrates a good level of research work. Good presentation of material that is mostly grounded in current research and best practice.
|
Demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the range and type of international assignments. The proposed international assignment is reasonably linked to the type of organisation`s strategic goal identified in the introduction. Their link is justified but not convincingly. Demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the proposed international assignment, including its characteristics, advantages and disadvantages for both organisations and employees. Demonstrates a satisfactory level of research work.
Satisfactory presentation of material that is mostly grounded in current research and best practice.
|
Demonstrates a basic understanding of the range and type of international assignments. Limited attempt to link the chosen international assignment to the type of organisation`s (international/global) strategy identified in the introduction. Demonstrates a basic understanding of the proposed international assignment, including its characteristics, advantages and disadvantages for both organisations and employees. Demonstrates a limited research work. Basic presentation of material that is mostly grounded in current research and best practice.
|
Demonstrates some understanding of the range and type of international assignments, but the discussion is wholly descriptive. Lacks clear focus and does not analyse in detail one specific type of international assignment.
Analysis is poorly organised. Resources are irrelevant, muddled or inappropriate.
|
Does not demonstrate an understanding of the range and type of international assignments or of the assignment tasks Analysis is poorly organised.
Lacks clear focus. No real analysis and demonstration of understanding of one specific type of international assignment and the ability to critique and synthesise information. No reliable resources used.
|
Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.
|
|
Criterion 3 (40%):
Cultural differences and training and support programme
|
Critically discusses the cultural differences between home and host countries and their implications for international assignees. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the factors involved in training and supporting international assignees, including the phases of an international assignment, career development, personal development, and family aspects. The analysis is exceptionally well linked to the type of international assignment discussed in the introduction. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the characteristics of ideal candidates for international assignments. The design and quality of the training programme is outstanding, such that it can be directly implemented by organisations/HR professionals. Demonstrates
an exceptional high level of
|
Critically discusses the cultural differences between home and host countries and their implications for international assignees. Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the factors involved in training and supporting international assignees, including the phases of an international assignment, career development, personal development, and family aspects. The analysis is very well linked to the type of international assignment discussed in the introduction. Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the characteristics of ideal candidates for international assignments. The design and quality of the training programme is excellent, such that it can be directly implemented by organisations/HR professionals. Extensive research work.
Excellent presentation of
material that is grounded in
|
Offers a thoughtful discussion of the cultural differences between home and host countries and their implications for international assignees.
Demonstrates a very good understanding of the factors involved in training and supporting international assignees, including the phases of an international assignment, career development, personal development, and family aspects. The analysis is very well linked to the type of international assignment discussed in the introduction. Demonstrates a very good understanding of the characteristics of ideal candidates for international assignments. The design and quality of the training programme is thoughtfully designed, such that it could be implemented by organisations/HR professionals after some changes.
Demonstrates a very good level
|
Discusses the cultural differences between home and host countries and their implications for international assignees, although some parts are rather descriptive.
Demonstrates a good understanding of the factors involved in training and supporting international assignees, including the phases of an international assignment, career development, personal development, and family aspects. The analysis is well linked to the type of international assignment discussed in the introduction. Demonstrates a good understanding of the characteristics of ideal candidates for international assignments. The training programme is well designed but some arguments need some attention before it could be presented to organisations/HR professionals. Demonstrates a
good level of research work.
|
Discusses the cultural differences between home and host countries and their implications for international assignees, although rather descriptively. Demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the factors involved in training and supporting international assignees, including the phases of an international assignment, career development, personal development, and family aspects. The analysis is linked to the type of international assignment discussed in the introduction, albeit unconvincingly. Demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the characteristics of ideal candidates for international assignments. The training programme needs rethinking and rewriting before it could be presented to organisations/HR professionals. Demonstrates a satisfactory level of research
work. The material is not
|
Discusses the cultural differences between home and host countries and their implications for international assignees descriptively.
Demonstrates a basic understanding of the factors involved in training and supporting international assignees, including the phases of an international assignment, career development, personal development, and family aspects. Limited attempt to link the content of the training programme to the type of international assignment discussed in the previous section. Demonstrates a basic understanding of the characteristics of ideal candidates for international assignments. The training programme needs rethinking and rewriting before it could be presented to organisations/HR professionals. Demonstrates a basic level of research work. The
material is not grounded in
|
No clear attempt to explain the cultural differences between home and host countries. Very limited understanding of the factors involved in training and supporting international assignees, including the phases of an international assignment, career development, personal development, and family aspects. No clear attempt to link the content of the training programme to the type of international assignment discussed in the previous section. Demonstrates a very limited understanding of the characteristics of ideal candidates for international assignments. The discussion is wholly descriptive and poorly organised.
|
Does not demonstrate an understanding of cultural differences and training and supporting assignees. Analysis is poorly organised. Lacks clear focus. No real analysis and demonstration of ability to critique and synthesise information. No reliable resources used.
|
Missing. Wholly incorrect or not attempted.
|
