Identification of Sustainable Challenges
25%
|
Exceptional identification of five sustainable challenges faced by businesses.
|
Identifies five sustainable challenges faced by businesses with a good understanding.
|
Identifies at least three sustainable challenges faced by businesses but lacks depth in analysis.
|
Identifies two sustainable challenges faced by businesses but lacks clarity or accuracy.
|
Identifies one or fewer sustainable challenges or provides inaccurate information.
|
Fails to identify any sustainable challenges or provides inaccurate information.
|
Discussion of Possible Solutions
20%
|
Provides a comprehensive discussion of possible solutions for the challenges outlined, demonstrating a deep understanding of the case study and academic theory.
|
Offers a thorough discussion of possible solutions for the challenges with a good understanding.
|
Discusses possible solutions for some of the challenges but lacks depth or clarity.
|
Offers limited discussion of possible solutions for the challenges with unclear or inaccurate explanations.
|
Provides vague or inadequate solutions for the challenges with significant inaccuracies or omissions.
|
Fails to discuss possible solutions or provides inaccurate information.
|
Application of Triple Bottom Line Approach
25%
|
Demonstrates an excellent understanding of the triple bottom line approach and effectively applies it to analyze the challenges and solutions outlined in the report.
|
Applies the triple bottom line approach to analyze the challenges and solutions with a good understanding.
|
Attempts to apply the triple bottom line approach but lacks depth or coherence in the analysis.
|
Provides a limited application of the triple bottom line approach with unclear or inaccurate analysis.
|
Provides a vague or inadequate application of the triple bottom line approach with significant inaccuracies or omissions.
|
Fails to apply the triple bottom line approach or provides inaccurate information.
|
Use of Sources and Referencing
15%
|
Demonstrates exceptional use of high-quality academic sources, correctly referenced throughout the report. Adheres to a consistent and accurate referencing style.
|
Uses relevant academic sources and appropriately references them. Minor errors in referencing may be present but do not significantly impact the report`s quality.
|
Utilizes some academic sources but may include inaccuracies or inconsistencies in referencing. References may be somewhat limited in number.
|
Uses limited academic sources with significant errors or inconsistencies in referencing. May rely heavily on non-academic sources.
|
Uses few or inappropriate sources with major errors or inconsistencies in referencing. Fails to adhere to a consistent referencing style.
|
Fails to use academic sources or provides inaccurate or no referencing.
|
Overall Structure and Presentation
15%
|
Exceptionally well-structured report with a clear introduction, logical flow, and well-organized content. Presents ideas effectively and with precision.
|
Well-structured report with a clear introduction, mostly logical flow, and organized content. Presents ideas coherently.
|
Adequate structure with a somewhat clear introduction and a generally logical flow. Content may lack some organization.
|
Structure is somewhat disorganized, with an unclear introduction and limited logical flow. Content lacks coherence.
|
Poorly structured report with an unclear introduction and minimal logical flow. Content lacks organization and coherence.
|
Severely lacks structure and coherence, making the report difficult to follow.
|