BMG920 Business Development & Innovation
BMG920 - Management Project Dissertation
Module Handbook 2023/24
Module Code: BMG920 (50221)
Course: MSc Business Development & Innovation
Department of Management Leadership & Marketing Ulster University Business School
Notice
Please be aware the information provided within the module handbook is subject to change.
BMG920 Business Development & Innovation
Table of Contents
- Learning and Teaching Methods.................................................................................................................................................. 23
- Student Voice & Support Services.............................................................................................................................................. 27
It is assumed that as this study is being conducted on human subjects, an information sheet and associated consent form will be provided. A copy of the information sheet and form must be attached to this application. See Notes of Guidance... 35
Appendices
Research Ethics Form (for Primary Research Only)............................................................................................................................... 31
A sample Consent Form (for Primary Research Only).......................................................................................................................... 37
Dear Students,
Welcome to the BMG920 (50221) - Management Project Dissertation. This module aims to develop essential research knowledge and skills so that you can learn the methods of producing an effective research proposal and of completing a reliable, small-scale research project. This handbook contains all the necessary information you need to complete this module successfully. Please read, review and reflect on the teaching and learning schedule, the reading list, and the assessment requirements.
It is important that you have a copy of this handbook in your personal learning folder so that you can refer to this whenever you need it. You are most welcome to contact me by email if you have any questions or if you need additional information.
I hope you find this module interesting and useful.
Kind regards, Emmet Donaghey Module Coordinator May 2024
1. BMG920 Module - Overview & Communication
Course/s: MSc Business Development & Innovation (BDI)
|
Module Details |
|||
|
Module Title |
Management Research Dissertation |
||
|
Module Code |
BMG620 (50221) |
Module Level |
7 |
|
Credit points |
40 |
Module Status |
Core |
|
Semester |
3 |
Location |
|
|
E-learning |
Blended learning (Face-to-face ‘Block Teaching’ and Online) |
||
|
Contact Details & Communication Methods |
|||
|
Module Coordinator |
|
||
|
Teaching Staff Contact Details |
|
||
|
General Information, Queries and Consultations |
If you require advice on any aspect of the module, please read the guidance provided here, in the Module Handbook. For General Queries, please send an email, clearly specifying your name, module name and your question. For Specific Queries or studies advice, you can avail of the ‘Student Hours’. Contact me by email to arrange a suitable appointment. Please note, we aim to respond to all queries within 24 hours during the working week. |
||
|
Module Announcements |
Key announcements will be presented during tutor-led activities. Out of class communication including notifications, reminders, etc will be distributed via the Blackboard Announcement tool. You will receive a duplication of the announcement direct to your student email inbox. It is essential that you check your emails regularly. It also advisable that you download the ‘Blackboard’ App as an alternative to access these announcements, notifications and reminders as well as content. |
||
2. Aim & Learning Outcomes
As all organisations irrespective of the sector in which they operate face ever increasing pressures to achieve enhanced levels of performance. Creativity and innovation skills lie at the heart of company survival. It is therefore imperative for business development and innovation students to be equipped with the appropriate research, consultancy, and project management skills in order to translate creative and innovative ideas into successfully implemented projects. The entry understanding for this module is that students will likely have limited prior experience in designing or developing a management research report at postgraduate degree level in a business and management related subject. Therefore, it is essential that students undertake this module to develop essential research knowledge and skills to allow the students to add value to their organisations through applying appropriate research and project management techniques to a complex, live business issue of strategic relevance from a business development and innovation perspective.
Aims
- To further develop business development and innovation skills.
- To pursue an in-depth study within an area of business development and innovation management.
- To develop skills required to identify, research, evaluate and solve an organisational issue of strategic value.
- To devlop knowledge and skills in research methods and techniques to manipulate complex data to assist management decision making.
- To equip students with the necessary competencies to prepare a structured, well-presented research report / dissertation.
Learning Outcomes
Successful students will be able to:
- Synthesise and apply multidisciplinary concepts, tools and techniques in resolving real- time management issues.
- Be creative in identifying and diagnosing a valid research topic and designing an appropriate method of investigation.
- Apply knowledge of business development, innovation and management issues creatively to a problem-solving situation.
- Use critical reflection to gain an insight upon existing business and management practice.
Contents
The following topics will be covered in this module so that the students are able to develop the requisite research and project management skills in completing their management project and dissertation:
Management Project & Writing a proposal
- Introduction to requirements of the Project
- Doing research in the real-world context
- Doing research online
- Primary and Secondary research
- Aims and objectives
- Choosing a topic
- Defining the scope of the project
- The art of writing research questions
- Sample titles & Past projects
- Writing a Research proposal (Title, background, research questions and objectives,
- method, timescale, resources, references)
- Creating an Audio Podcast and submitting an Audio File
Research Process, Implementation & Writing up Dissertation
- Conducting a critical literature review
- Ethics and trustworthiness of an empirical study
- Data collection and sampling strategies
- Quantitative research methods with a focus on designing survey studies
- Qualitative research methods with a focus on interviews and focus groups
- Data analysis methods (descriptive statistics, thematic analysis)
- Validation of data
- Presentation of results
- Drawing conclusions and linking finds to existing research
- Risks of bias, assumptions and inappropriate conclusions
- Writing up research
Project Management Skills
- Planning a research project
- Making the most of literature review
- Study skills (critical reading of literature, note taking, reference management)
- Time management skills
The above contents will be delivered in four interconnected phases to methodically guide students in designing, developing, implementing a research project
- Phase 1: Idea generation phase will equip students with the knowledge to further identify, and articulate reliable and valid research/project issues. Further, this phase will equip students with the skills to develop clear and articulate research objectives in support of their project idea; in partnership with their host organisation, where appropriate.
- In Phase 2 of this journey, we will focus on developing skills for literature review and learn about research methodology and ethics.
- In Phase 3, students will further develop their understanding of research skills, and cover a range of salient research methods and data analytical approaches.
- In Phase 4, this is a `writing up your research phase` and students will be given support to write up their project
3. Assessment and Feedback
|
This module will be assessed via the followings items of assessment |
|
||
|
|
Assessment Type |
Weighting (%) |
Feedback due date |
|
COURSEWORK 1 |
Submit a Research Proposal as an Audio Podcast, along with a 1500-word `show notes` document |
15% |
+3 weeks post submission date |
|
COURSEWORK 2 |
Submit a 10000-words Management Project Dissertation |
85% |
+3 weeks post submission date |
Coursework 1
Assessment Task
Create and submit a research proposal in the form of a 5-minute audio podcast, along with a 1500 word ‘show notes’ document.
Key information:
This assessment has two integral parts:
(1) It contains an audio research proposal. A research proposal is a concise and coherent summary of your proposed research project. (This document summarises what you ‘propose’ to do in your dissertation, which will be submitted in September 2024). You are required to submit this proposal in an audio format. This audio presentation (or a podcast) is a 5-minute long, spoken-word digital audio file that a student creates for submission. In that recording, the student explains the following:
1. the aim and objectives of the proposed research
2. the rationale for the research including the business value expected,
3. a short summary of the relevant literature,
4. an overview of the intended research methodology and methods to be employed and
5. a project plan including time (and cost) considerations.
(2) Along with the above audio proposal, each student will submit a `show notes` document to help the listener understand the recording with greater ease. In essence, this is the planning document that you would have used to structure the audio presentation/podcast.
- Your `show notes` is a part of your coursework and will be used as evidence for demonstrating your knowledge and understanding of the proposed research, and as evidence of your engagement with reading additional materials.
- The `show notes` document is a typed-up WORD document, with a maximum of 1500 words in length. It will contain the following:
- a general outline of the podcast,
- a short explanation for each of the five bullet points seen above, and
- a reference list (if sources are cited in the audio recording). This assessment constitutes 15% of the module mark.
ASSESSMENT DEADLINE: Friday 14th June 2024 by 5pm
Assessment Guidelines
- It is an individual assignment that involves developing a research proposal in an audio podcast format. In this proposal you must explain the central issues or questions that you intend to address in your Management Project. It should include research objectives and questions, an appreciation of the relevant literature for the research topic (relevant applied and theoretical business models should underpin this piece), an overview of the chosen methodology that will be employed, including the rationale for the research methodology to be used, and a detailed project plan.
- Primary Research is not mandatory, but you are encouraged to undertake primary research wherever possible, using web-based data collection tools. (Support will be given during the lectures).
- Students are encouraged to collaborate with their supervisors, as soon as possible, in exploring possible options to conduct primary research remotely. Ulster University Business School as a research-informed institution, and your supervisor as a teacher/active researcher may have links with local organisations. It is important that students take initiative to work with their supervisor to identify a piece of research that utilises primary sources of data.
- However, during this time of unprecedented change, undertaking secondary research is also sufficient for these modules. Sources of secondary data include, among others.
|
Bibliographies |
Official statistics |
|
Biographical works |
Research Institutions (including UUBS) |
|
Books/online blogs |
Technical reports |
|
Commentaries, criticisms |
Textbooks |
|
Dictionaries, Encyclopaedias |
Trade Journals |
|
Histories |
National/regional/local survey data |
|
Journal articles |
Qualitative data collected earlier |
How to do a piece of research using only secondary sources will be discussed during the virtual teaching sessions. There are several online resources also available on this topic. Datasets when available, will be shared with those students who wish to use them for this assignment.
- No one will be academically disadvantaged if they cannot undertake primary research.
- Marking Criteria: This coursework accounts for 15% of the overall assessment. Students should refer to the marking criteria attached in Table 1 (See page 15).
- How to submit Assessment? Students will submit their Proposals, via Turnitin Link placed on the Module page (See ‘Submit your Proposals here’ Link on the BMG920 module page).
- All submitted documents should have the file name: BMG920-Surname-Proposal.
- Late submissions will be penalised by the deduction of marks.
10. View additional ‘Standard Assessment Guidance,’ for further guidance applicable to all coursework elements.
11. Coursework Formative FEEDBACK: During the supervisor meetings, formative feedback will be given to all everyone. Students are encouraged to explore and discuss ways of submitting their drafts prior to the deadline so that they can get formative feedback from their supervisors.
12. Coursework 1 Summative Feedback and Marks: Assignment feedback will be returned electronically in written format by the Module Coordinator/the supervisors via Turnitin, using the grading sheet, seen in Table 1. Additional verbal feedback will be available upon request from the respective supervisors.
Coursework 2
Assessment Task
(Aligned with the research proposal submitted in Coursework 1) Submit a Management
Research Dissertation on an independent piece of research, based either on primary sources or secondary sources of data on a topic related to Business Development and Innovation.
A research-based Management Research Dissertation is a large, independent piece of work requiring a high level of critical analysis of the chosen topic (i.e., theoretical issue or an applied problem identified by an organisation). This assessment constitutes 85% of the module mark.
ASSESSMENT DEADLINE: Friday 6th September 2024 by 5pm
Assessment Guidelines
It is an individual, written assignment that involves submitting a research dissertation or a management project.
It has 10,000 words, so that you can do sufficient in-depth analysis and discussion of the chosen topic.
- Abstracts, bibliographies, reference lists, appendices and footnotes are excluded from any word limit requirements.
- Where the submission exceeds the stipulated word limit by more than 10%, the submission will only be marked up to and including the additional 10%.
- Anything over this will not be included in the final grade for the assessment item.
It will have a structure. Please see pages 26-28 for a recommended structure, that contains a series of useful prompts.
It is acknowledged that certain sections of the dissertation (such as introduction, organisational overview and research questions/objectives, and literature review) may contain some elements the proposal. However, in the dissertation, these sections will be fully developed, with new/additional descriptions. In addition, the dissertation will have more-developed sections on methodology and data analysis, and new sections on findings, discussion, conclusion and recommendations.
Marking Criteria: This coursework accounts for 85% of the overall assessment. Students should refer to the marking criteria attached in Table 2 (See page 16-17).
How to submit Assessment? Students will submit their Dissertations / Management Reports, via Turnitin Link placed on the Module page (See ‘Submit your Dissertation here’ Link on the BMG920 module page).
All submitted documents should have the file name: BMG920-Surname-Dissertation
You are not required to submit a hard copy.
Late submissions will be penalised by the deduction of marks.
View additional ‘Standard Assessment Guidance,’ (see page 18) for further guidance applicable to all coursework elements.
Coursework Formative FEEDBACK: During the supervisor meetings, formative feedback will be given to all everyone. Students are encouraged to explore and discuss ways of submitting their drafts prior to the deadline so that they can get formative feedback from their supervisors.
Coursework 1 Summative Feedback and Marks: Assignment feedback will be returned electronically in written format by the Module Coordinator/the supervisors via Turnitin, using the grading sheet, seen in Table 2. Additional verbal feedback will be available upon request from the respective supervisors.
Primary Research requires Ethics Approval
- Primary research projects should be submitted with an UUBS ethics approval form, duly signed by your project supervisor.
- The blank ethics form and a sample consent form are available at the end of this assignment brief (see Appendix 1 and 2).
- Projects without a Signed Ethical Approval Form will not be marked until a form is provided. At this point, the project will be treated as a late submission.
- Students are advised to discuss ethical implications of their research well in advance so that the required ethics approval is obtained on time, before the data collection. For more info: https://www.ulster.ac.uk/internal/research/governance-and-ethics
Extenuating Circumstances: If, due to extenuating circumstances, an extension to the submission date is required, students should apply in writing to the Course Director, with an accompanying EC1 form (available via the UU website). This must be approved by the Course Director at least one week before the due submission date, otherwise submission beyond the deadline shall be deemed to have failed.
Plagiarism: Plagiarism occurs where acknowledgements are omitted or quotations from original sources are not clearly identified. If the University deems you to be guilty of this offence, the project may attract a mark of zero. Your submission will be subject to Turnitin anti-plagiarism detection software. Turnitin checks students’ work for possible textual matches against internet available resources and its own proprietary database.
Appendices (For Primary Research Only)
- Research Ethics Approval Form (Appendix 1)
- A sample Consent Form (Appendix 2)
You can read more about Research Ethics for LOW-RISK CATEGORY inquiries, here: https://www.ulster.ac.uk/internal/research/governance-and-ethics/ethics/low You can also download various Ethics Forms on this page.
Table 1: BMG920 Audio Research Proposal - Level 7 - Assessment Criteria
|
Classification |
Percentage Range |
Introduction & Organisational Context (15%)
Is the project positioned well within its organisational and/or theoretical context, so that the research problem is clear to a reader? |
Aims and objectives of study (15%) Is the general aim of the project clearly established? Are the objectives clearly articulated? Has the student explained the relevance of this project? |
Relationship to previous work (30%) Is the background to the work clearly explained? Is it clear how the project will build upon previous knowledge in the area? Is the literature reviewed current, coherent and comprehensive? Has an appropriate critique of salient literature been presented? |
Proposed Methodology (30%) Has the methodology been outlined? Is the proposed approach likely to meet the project objectives? Is the proposed approach justified? Are the proposed sources of data (primary/secondary) justified? Will the proposed analysis methods meet stated objectives? Have proposed analysis methods been justified? |
Project plan and timescale (5%) Has a feasible project plan been created? |
Audio Production and Referencing (5%) Are sound levels consistent and the voice projects clarity and confidence. Both in the Show Notes and in the podcast, Is the linguistic expression of a good quality? Is the structure appropriate? Is referencing complete and consistent? |
|
Distinction |
70-100 |
Exceptional level of |
Exceptional level of |
Exceptional synthesis of |
Methodology is very appropriate to the |
Thoughtful, |
Sound levels are excellent and |
|
|
|
clarity in positioning |
clarity in ways the |
relevant and recent |
study and the choice is justified in |
realistic project |
consistent throughout. Voice |
|
|
|
the project in its |
project’s aim(s) and |
literature acknowledging key |
comparison with other approaches. |
plan, with a wide |
projects confidence. Voice is |
|
|
|
theoretical and/or |
objectives are |
authors in the subject |
Exceptional level of alignment of |
range of milestone |
clear and intelligible |
|
|
|
organisational |
articulated. The |
domain; Exceptional level of |
methodology with the objectives; Very |
indicators clearly |
throughout. |
|
|
|
context. The |
relevance of the project |
balance in critically |
high level of justification of the |
identified. |
Very high quality of written |
|
|
|
rationale is crystal |
is explained and |
evaluating the literature. |
proposed methods, sources of data. |
|
expression, with a very good |
|
|
|
clear. |
justified well. |
|
Very high level of clarity in the proposed analytical methods; Very |
|
structure. Very high level of accuracy in referencing, that is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
convincing level of justification of |
|
complete and consistent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
chosen methods. |
|
|
|
Commendation |
|
Very good |
Clarity in articulating the |
Very good review of |
Methodology is appropriate to the |
Good project plan, |
Sound levels are consistent |
|
[Very Good |
60 – 69 |
positioning of the |
project’s aim(s) and |
relevant and recent |
study. Very good level of alignment of |
with some of the |
throughout. Voice is clear and |
|
quality work] |
|
project in its |
objectives is very good. |
literature acknowledging key |
methodology with the objectives; Good |
milestone |
projects confidence. |
|
|
|
theoretical and/or |
The relevance of the |
authors in the subject |
level of justification of the proposed |
indicators clearly |
Well written proposal, with a |
|
|
|
organisational |
project is described |
domain; There is evidence |
methods, sources of data. Good level |
identified. |
good structure. Good level of |
|
|
|
context. The |
well. |
of critically evaluating the |
of clarity in the proposed analytical |
|
accuracy in referencing. |
|
|
|
rationale is |
|
literature. |
methods; Some justification of chosen |
|
|
|
|
|
presented well. |
|
|
methods. |
|
|
|
Pass |
|
Good positioning of |
Acceptable research |
Acceptable range of relevant |
Methodology is acceptable to the |
Acceptable project |
Sound levels are good. |
|
[Acceptable |
50 – 59 |
the project in its |
topic and clear |
literature is used, |
study. Reasonable understanding of |
plan, with some |
Voice was intelligible. |
|
work] |
|
theoretical and/or organisational |
rationale. Acceptable clarity in the articulation |
acknowledging some key authors in the subject |
the research process. Some evidence for justifying the chosen methods. |
indicators identified. |
Acceptable presentation of references in the text and |
|
|
|
context. The |
of aim(s) and |
domain. Some critical |
|
|
reference section. Acceptable |
|
|
|
rationale is |
objectives. Some |
analysis and evaluation of |
|
|
level of accuracy. |
|
|
|
presented at an acceptable level. |
rationale is provided. |
key issues. |
|
|
|
|
Fail |
|
The project/study is |
Lack of clarity in the |
Poor quality sources and |
Methodology is not appropriate for the |
Project plan is |
Sound quality is poor. Voice is |
|
(Unacceptable |
0 – 49 |
not positioned in its |
project’s aim(s) and |
types of literature used with |
study. Limited or no understanding of |
inadequate, with |
not intelligible. |
|
work) |
|
theoretical and/or organisational |
objectives, require rework and attention. |
little or no critique or evaluation of issues. |
the research process. |
limited or no indicators. |
Inadequate / weak / incorrect presentation of references in |
|
|
|
context. The |
The relevance of the |
|
|
|
the text and reference section. |
|
|
|
rationale is not clear. |
study is not articulated. |
|
|
|
Grammatical errors and mistakes found. |
Table 2: BMG920 Management Research Dissertation / - Assessment Criteria
|
|
Percentag e Range |
Aims and objectives (10%) |
Review of relevant literature (25%) |
Data Collection & Analysis (25%) |
Findings, Discussion, Conclusions & Implications (25%) |
Review & Reflective summary (5%) |
Presentation and Referencing (10%) |
|
Classification |
|
Is there a clear |
Have an in-depth knowledge |
Does the work |
How well has the student presented |
How well has the |
Quality of report |
|
(business) rationale for |
and understanding of the |
demonstrate clear and |
and discussed the findings in light of |
student reflected on |
structure and flow of |
||
|
the Project? |
relevant literature |
robust understanding of |
the literature reviewed and the study |
completing their |
arguments |
||
|
Are the objectives of |
demonstrated? |
research methodology? |
objectives? |
management report? |
Have sources been |
||
|
the project clearly |
Is there evidence of a |
Have the proposed |
How well has the study presented the |
Has the student |
consistently and |
||
|
stated? |
critical review/debate and |
sources of data |
conclusions? Are the conclusions of |
demonstrated suitable |
correctly referenced |
||
|
Are the objectives of |
evaluation of the relevant |
(primary/secondary) been |
high quality, logical, and coherent? |
project management |
using the Harvard |
||
|
the project realistic |
literature? |
justified? |
Do they demonstrate integration of |
skills in completing the |
referencing method? |
||
|
and achievable, i.e., is |
Is there evidence of |
Have an in-depth |
literature and project objectives? |
project (e.g., met |
How well has the |
||
|
it a viable proposition |
reviewing a wide variety of |
knowledge and |
How well has the student explain the |
deadlines set by |
report been checked |
||
|
(e.g., scope, |
relevant literature? |
understanding of relevant |
implications of the findings to |
academic |
for spelling and |
||
|
resources: time, cost, |
Have the themes in the |
research methods |
theory/policy/practice? |
supervisor/project |
grammar? |
||
|
people)? |
literature are clearly and |
demonstrated? |
The student has provided |
sponsor, maintained |
|
||
|
|
succinctly summarised and |
Has an understanding of |
recommendations that are |
proactive engagement |
|
||
|
|
presented? |
research ethics |
appropriate? |
with supervisor/project |
|
||
|
|
Have wider relevant external |
demonstrated? |
|
sponsor, completed the |
|
||
|
|
factors and management |
Has an understanding of |
|
project within the set |
|
||
|
|
issues been considered |
the study limitations |
|
objectives, resources) |
|
||
|
|
(environmental, social, |
demonstrated? |
|
|
|
||
|
|
technological, ethical)? |
Has sufficient data been |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
gathered to satisfy the |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
project objectives? |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
How effectively has the |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
data been analysed? |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
How effectively has the |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
data analysis and findings |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
been presented in line |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
with the research |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
objectives? |
|
|
|
|
Distinction |
70-100 |
Exceptional level of clarity in ways the project’s aim(s) and objectives are articulated. The relevance of the project is explained and justified well. Convincing justification for selecting topic and approach. |
Exceptional synthesis of relevant and recent literature acknowledging key authors in the subject domain; Demonstration of a discerning, creative and critical engagement with what has been read. Exceptional awareness of contextual factors and their influence. |
Methodology is very appropriate to the study and the choice is justified in comparison with other approaches. Outstanding analytical techniques and approaches, evidence of creation of new approaches (if appropriate), thorough, rigorous and transparent analysis, exceptionally well justified. |
Exceptional level of clarity in presenting the findings. Sophisticated and critical discussion of the issues involved, outstanding reflection on the strengths and weaknesses of the research, offers fresh/new insights on the problem; Exceptional conclusions that relate strongly to the topic of the dissertation with excellent links with literature and justification in the evidence. An exceptional analysis of implications and solid recommendations. |
Thoughtful reflection on resources invested in the study. Structured presentation of lessons learned. Contains an honest review of strengths and weaknesses of the researcher as a learner. Outstanding articulation of how this project improved the researcher as a learner/reflective practitioner. |
Very high quality of written expression, with a very good structure. Very high level of accuracy in referencing, that is complete and consistent. the researcher’s ‘voice’ is heard, and their authority is felt in the writing. |
|
Commendation [Very Good quality work] |
60 – 69 |
Clarity in articulating the project’s aim(s) and objectives is very good. The relevance of the project is described well. Very good justification for selecting the topic and approach. |
Very good review of relevant and recent literature acknowledging key authors in the subject domain; There is evidence of critically evaluating the literature. Very good awareness of contextual factors and their influence. |
Methodology is appropriate to the study. Very good level of alignment of methodology with the objectives; Good level of justification of the proposed methods, sources of data. Thorough analysis. |
Clearly presented findings. Very good discussion of the issues involved, good reflection on the strengths and weaknesses of the research, offers good insights on the problem; Conclusions relate strongly to the topic of the dissertation with good links with literature and justification in the evidence. Very good analysis of implications and relevant recommendations. |
Very good presentation of lessons learned. Contains strengths and weaknesses of researcher as a learner. Very good articulation of how this project improved the researcher. |
Well written Report, with a good structure. Good level of accuracy in referencing. Noticeable evidence for the researcher’s voice. |
|
Pass [Acceptable work] |
50 – 59 |
Acceptable research topic and clear rationale. Acceptable clarity in the articulation of aim(s) and objectives. Some rationale is provided. Some justification for selecting the topic and approach. |
Acceptable range of relevant literature is used, acknowledging some key authors in the subject domain. Some critical analysis and evaluation of key issues. Good awareness of contextual factors and their influence. |
Methodology is acceptable to the study. Reasonable understanding of the research process. Some evidence for justifying the chosen methods. Acceptable level of analysis. |
Findings are presented, with an acceptable level of discussion of the issues involved; some reflection on the strengths and weaknesses of the research, offers some insights on the problem; Conclusions relate to the topic of the dissertation with some links with literature and justification in the evidence. Good analysis of implications and relevant recommendations. |
Good presentation of lessons learned. Good articulation of how this project improved the researcher. |
Acceptable presentation of references in the text and reference section. Acceptable level of accuracy. Some indicators of the researcher’s voice. |
|
Fail |
0 – 49 |
Lack of clarity in the project’s aim(s) and objectives, require rework and attention. The relevance of the study is not articulated. Justification is not provided. |
Poor quality sources and types of literature used with little or no critique or evaluation of issues. Limited or no awareness of contextual factors and their influence. |
Methodology is not appropriate for the study. Limited or no understanding of the research process. Limited or no information on analytical processes used. |
Findings are ambiguous, with limited or no discussion of the issues involved; limited or no reflection on the strengths and weaknesses of the research; Conclusions poorly justified by evidence, they have a poor relationship to the topic of the report, their development is of poor quality, implications and recommendations are not of practical use. |
Limited or no thoughtful reflection on what is learned, and how the researcher could improve his/her skill in future. |
Poor presentation, many spelling and grammatical errors, difficult to understand, inappropriately structured. The tone does not exhibit an understanding of the academic writing genre or understanding of the topic. |
BMG920 Management Research Dissertation
Additional Assessment Guidance
The following guidance is applicable to all coursework items.
- Word count includes in-text references and citations but excludes the title page, contents page, tables, reference list and appendices.
- Your work should include references to relevant journal articles and other good quality information sources, and should be properly laid out using the Harvard system of referencing. More detailed guidance is available in the ‘Guide to Referencing in the Harvard Style’. We encourage you to make good use of all the support services offered by your Faculty Subject Librarian, further details are in the Learning Support Services Section.
- You should refer to the assessment criteria to provide fuller details of the marking criteria for each classification band.
- In addition, you should refer to the standard assessment guidelines as presented in your Course Handbook/Support Area, this includes guidance and policies on referencing style, plagiarism, etc.
- We recommend the use of Studiosity which offers constructive feedback on draft written submissions within 24 hrs.
- Coursework must be submitted by the dates specified. Coursework submitted after the deadline, without prior approval, is not normally accepted. For further guidance on the late submission of coursework, please see the course handbook.
- Non-compliance with the word limit will result in a penalty being applied in accordance with the University Word Limit Policy which can be found on your Course Support Area in Blackboard.
4. Learning Resources
BMG920 Management Research Dissertation
|
Reading List |
|
Books Required (Must read) |
|
|
Books Recommended (Could read) |
On ‘Online Data Collection’ methods and strategies (eBooks and Journal Papers) 1. Whiting, R. (2021) Collecting Qualitative Data using Digital Methods. Sage. |
|
|
Additional Journal Papers (Useful to read for deep learning) |
|
Please refer to Teaching and Learning Plan (Page 25-26) in which lecture-specific readings are given for each day of teaching. |
|
Useful Journals (as Ranked in Association of Business Schools Journal Ranking List) |
|
|
Useful Library Databases & Websites |
|
Start from USearch (on our library homepage) ABI Inform Collection (ProQuest) EBSCO Emerald Management Scopus https://methods.sagepub.com Get help from our subject librarians to develop your literature-search skills (More info, see overleaf |
BMG920 Management Research Dissertation
Library’s Support Services
In collaboration with teac In collaboration with teaching staff, your Business Librarian will be delivering timetabled workshops to ensure you are able to make the best use of the Library’s services and information resources in successfully completing your coursework. Furthermore, if you need specific help with an assignment or dissertation then you can make an appointment to meet with your Business Librarian by email, phone or through using the appointments schedule. Online support is also available through the Library’s subject pages for Business and Management and these
provide help in developing your information and research skills through literature searching , academic writing support and referencing.
Blackboard Learning Support
If you require help or support with any of the digital learning tools utilised within your module, please view Ulster’s Blackboard Student Support area. The Blackboard Helpdesk can be contacted via 028 9536 7188, or by e-mail to blackboardhelpdesk@ulster.ac.uk
5. Organisation and Management
BMG920 Management Research Dissertation is a 40-credit point module, this requires 400 hours of your commitment, distributed through the following learning and teaching activities over semester 3:
|
Activity |
Duration |
Total Hours |
|
Lecture |
20 hours |
20 |
|
Workshops |
10 hours |
10 |
|
Tutorials |
10 hours |
10 |
|
Independent Study – Research Activities |
360 hours |
360 |
|
TOTAL |
400 |
|
The teaching and learning plan provides a more detailed overview of content on a daily basis. Module delivery will consist of 4 block teaching sessions:
1. WEDNESDAY 01/05/24): 10AM-5PM
- ROOM: BC-03-115
2. THURSDAY 02/05/24: 10AM-5PM
- ROOM: BC-03-115A
3. FRIDAY 03/05/24: 10AM-5PM
- ROOM: BC-03-115
4. FRIDAY 10/05/24: 10AM-5PM
- ROOM: BD-01-006
5. Learning and Teaching Methods
The module is delivered fully on-campus and will be facilitated through the provision of the following learning and teaching activities
- Live Lectures: We will have face to face lectures in teaching rooms at the Belfast Campus.
- The module will develop students’ understanding of issues pertaining to applied research within the field of management. It will draw on material from different disciplines to explore the merits of research. It will highlight difficulties and dilemmas inherent in real world research, thus providing a comprehensive preparation for undertaking a management project at postgraduate level. The online sessions will assist students in diagnosing, designing and executing reliable and valid applied project ideas. They will also help students refresh their research skills or to gain a deeper understanding of the research process.
- Use of the Module Page: During this time of emergency remote teaching, the University’s virtual learning environment will extensively be used for posting all relevant materials and for learning, teaching purposes, including assignment submission and feedback. Students should visit the page regularly to access course materials.
- Pre-reading and Post-reading: By way of preparation, you are expected to read the relevant chapters in the recommended textbooks and to compile your own notes, before attending the lectures to derive maximum benefit. The teaching hours will be used to emphasise key issues, to introduce additional material or to introduce alternative perspectives
Supervisor Allocation & Role of the Supervisor
- Supervisors have been allocated and the module coordinator will communicate this information. Supervisors’ role is to guide and support students through all steps of the process. It is important that students take the initiative to contact their supervisor as soon as possible. This early engagement supplemented by the online support sessions will prepare students fully for their management project.
- It must be remembered that the management project belongs to the student and not the supervisor. This means that whilst a supervisor may provide advice and guidance, the student has to make a judgment as to whether or not to accept this. A student cannot come back and say that the supervisor ‘told’ him/her to put material into the management project. The final decision must rest with the student.
- The supervisor`s role is to provide guidance and feedback at various stages of the project process.
It is not one of subject `expert`, but to guide students on methodology, structure and scheduling.
- Students have to take responsibility for deciding when the management project is ready for submission. It is not the supervisor’s duty to tell a student that the work is ready for submission, thereby implying that the management project is of a pass standard. The process is largely self- driven, requiring significant self-discipline and time management skills. That said, students are strongly advised to seek the approval of their supervisor before formal submission of the project. This, in itself, is not a guarantee that the project will pass.
- When conducting primary research, the supervisor will monitor any material (such as a questionnaire) that a student might be sending from the University to an external agency, as these need to fit within the remit of the Ulster Business School’s Ethical Approval Guidelines (see Appendix 4 & 5 for Ethics form and Consent Form).
- Online Resources: These will be an integral part of the delivery. See the library reading list. You will be directed to academic, professional and open content resources to extend your knowledge, understanding and application every week.
- Independent Study: Utilise this time to prepare for lectures and research your assessment tasks.
- Electronic Assessment: TurnItIn Feedback Studio and/or Blackboard Learn Assessments will enable assessment information submission and feedback delivery
|
Learning and Teaching Plan – BMG920 |
||||
|
Phase |
Day |
Content |
Pre-Reading |
Post-Reading |
|
Introduction: Module Overview, Research Topics and Objectives |
1 01/05/23 |
|
||
|
Literature Review Introduction to various research strategies |
2 02/05/23 |
|
P. Thornhill (2019). (eBook) Research methods for business students. Pearson. (Access to Three users at one time, from UU library page) – Chapters 4 and 5. |
|
|
Data Collection Methods for research and consultancy projects |
3 03/05/23 |
|
||
|
Learning and Teaching Plan – BMG920 |
||||
|
Phase |
Day |
Content |
Pre-Reading |
Post-Reading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data Analysis |
4 10/05/23 |
|
||
|
Writing up Research |
5 TBC |
|
||
To achieve higher grades in this module (and broaden your current knowledge on Research Skills), it is important that you read recommended textbooks and high-quality academic journal papers.
6. Student Voice & Support Services
As a course team, we incorporate the key partnership principles set out in the joint UU & UUSU Student Voice Guidelines and proactively engage with the democratic election of UUSU
academic student reps (Faculty Reps, School/Dept Reps & Course Reps) to ensure that student opinion is heard at Ulster. We respect your views and welcome your honest and constructive feedback on the module.
There are several ways to do this:
- You can contact your Module Coordinator about any queries related to your learning experiences on the module as/when you have them.
- You can voice your opinions through the formal Staff/Student Consultative Committee process by contacting one of the elected UUSU Course Reps in your class.
- You will have the opportunity to give feedback on the module through completing the online Student Module Feedback Survey.
UUSU Advice Bureau Service
If you are experiencing difficulties that are impacting your studies, you can contact the Advice Bureau in the Students’ Union (UUSU). You can get advice and guidance on issues such as - complaints, appeals, housing problems, disciplinaries, and info on various support providers available. To have a chat with the team, contact UUSU online.
UU Student Wellbeing Service
Ulster University’s Student Wellbeing team is available to help you manage common pressures many students experience while studying in higher education. Common pressures include stress, relationship issues, financial problems, and managing disability-related challenges, including mental health difficulties. There is no stigma to seeking support to maximise your wellbeing and achievement at UU.
Student Wellbeing support is free and confidential and you can make contact via
email studentwellbeing@ulster.ac.uk, telephone 028 9536 7000, or webchat during the hours of 08:45- 17:00 Monday to Thursday and 8:45-16:00 Friday. Other external helplines are also available.
Introductory Information
- Title Page:
- Course Name
- Project Title
- Student Name
- Student Number
- Supervisor Name
- Date
- Declaration page
Dissertation Recommended Structure
Appendix 1
- Declaration stating that the project, submitted in partial fulfilment of the MSc (Business Development and Innovation), is your own work and due acknowledgement has been made to the work of others as appropriate
- Include your Electronic Signature
- Confidentiality Statement as appropriate (if your report contains data of a confidential nature its security can be guaranteed by clearly marking it ‘Strictly Confidential’ on the Title Page.)
- Acknowledgements
- Thank any people that have assisted/contributed to your project.
- Abstract (Only for the Dissertations) OR Executive Summary (A short summary of the project) – [Only for the Management Reports]
Essentially this section is a concise summary of the different sections of the report. It is NOT an outline of all what you did. – For example, it should contain information about the research topic, a short description of the project, in terms of some background information, your project aim, your methodology, main findings, conclusions and recommendations from your research.
- Contents Page (with page numbers)
- Tables/Graphs (Headings are given with their page numbers)
Main Body
The main body of the report should not exceed 9,500 words and be structured into the following sections.
- Introduction
- What is the setting for your project?
- What is your project about?
- What are the aim and objectives/ research questions of your project?
- Describe how your project will assist the organisation, if relevant and applicable.
- Describe the consultation process you have undertaken with the organisation, if appropriate and applicable.
- Review of relevant literature
- What are the key concepts and theories that provide some background or platform for your research project? Discussing these entail, a thorough review of relevant studies related to your research. Make sure you consult a wide range of relevant literature/ studies. Ensure this is a critical review – not just descriptive or an annotated bibliography. All sources should be correctly attributed using the Harvard Referencing format.
- Methodology used for data collection (when undertaking primary research)
- What methodology did you adopt and why?
- What is the principle or philosophy that guides & shapes your research project and why (example Positivist, interpretivist; inductive/deductive, etc.)?
- Who is your research sample and why?
- What methods did you employ for collecting data and why?
- How did you ensure adequate ethical procedure?
- What are your hypotheses, if applicable.
- How did you analyse your data (analytical and statistical procedures employed) and why?
When undertaking secondary research (Consider the following)
- Why did you select this data source? Why this dataset?
- What are your source’s credentials?
- Does it include a methods section and are the methods sound? What methods were used?
- What’s the Date of Publication?
- Who is the Intended Audience? Other researchers or the general public?
- What is the Coverage of the Report or Document? Does the work update other sources, substantiate other materials/reports that you have read, or add new information to the topic area?
- Is it originally a Primary or Secondary Source? If the source is secondary, does it accurately relate information from primary sources?
- Does the author provide references for the data and information reported?
- Do the numbers make sense? Are they the numbers you want – cases versus percentages?
When compared to related data are the measures somewhat consistent?
- How are your research questions and the data related?
- Will this dataset answer your research questions?
- Findings
- Clear and logical presentation of the findings or results of your research, sighting corresponding examples/ instances from your collected/ generated data
- These might include tables, graphs or other diagrams
- Ensure your results correspond with your stated research objectives/ research questions, or hypotheses (if applicable)
- You might want to consider integrating this section with the Discussion section or it can be a standalone Section.
- Discussion
- An analytical/ critical discussion of your findings/ results aimed at addressing your research objectives or answering your stated research question(s)/ hypotheses
- Refer to any diagrams, questionnaire results, graphs, etc. discussed/ presented in the Results/ Findings Chapter
- What are the implications of your findings?
- How do your findings link with existing research?
- Conclusions and Recommendations
- What do your findings show? What do you conclude from your findings?
- What were the limitations of your project?
- What recommendations would you make on the basis of your findings?
- Do you think your recommendations are innovative or entrepreneurial? How and why are they?
End Matter
- Reflective Review (should not exceed 500 words)
- References
- Signed Ethical Approval Form* (when undertaking primary research)
- A Record of virtual meetings (A table with the date, medium of communication, points discussed, actions agreed)
- Appendices, where appropriate.
- These should include any material which is of interest but which is peripheral to the project,
e.g. a sample consent form, additional tables of results, graphs, photos, some sections of the raw data from surveys and one transcript of the interviews, etc.
- You should try and keep any such appendices to a minimum.
Appendix 2
UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER
RESEARCH GOVERNANCE
RG1a APPLICATION TO UNDERTAKE RESEARCH ON HUMAN SUBJECTS
|
PLEASE REFER TO THE NOTES OF GUIDANCE BEFORE COMPLETING THIS FORM. (Available from the Research Governance website at http://www.ulster.ac.uk/research/rg/) All sections of this form must be completed (use minimum font size 11). If the form is altered in any way it will be returned unconsidered by the Committee. This form should be used for research in categories A, B and D Do not use this form for research being conducted in collaboration with the NHS/HPSS (category C). |
SECTION A
Chief Investigator
Title of Project
Student and course (if applicable)
Additional Investigators
Declaration - Chief Investigator:
I confirm that
- this project meets the definition for research in category* (please insert)
- this project is viable and is of research or educational merit;
- all risks and ethical and procedural implications have been considered;
- the project will be conducted at all times in compliance with the research description/protocol and in accordance with the University’s requirements on recording and reporting;
- this application has not been submitted to and rejected by another committee; and
- Permission has been granted to use all copyright materials including questionnaires and similar instruments
BMG920 Business Development & Innovation is a dynamic course that explores the intricacies of fostering growth and innovation within the business landscape. Through a comprehensive curriculum, students delve into the strategic frameworks and practical methodologies essential for driving sustainable development and fostering a culture of innovation. From analyzing market trends to devising innovative strategies, this course equips students with the tools and insights needed to navigate the complexities of today`s business environment effectively. Through case studies, simulations, and real-world projects, students gain practical experience in identifying opportunities, overcoming challenges, and driving strategic change to propel organizations forward in an ever-evolving marketplace.
At the heart of BMG920 Business Development & Innovation lies a commitment to cultivating forward-thinking leaders capable of driving transformative change. Through a blend of theoretical learning and hands-on experience, students develop the skills and mindset necessary to lead innovation initiatives and capitalize on emerging opportunities. By fostering a collaborative learning environment and encouraging critical thinking, this course empowers students to challenge conventional wisdom, embrace uncertainty, and drive innovation that creates value for both businesses and society at large. With a focus on practical application and strategic thinking, BMG920 Business Development & Innovation prepares students to become catalysts for growth and innovation in today`s dynamic business landscape


