3
Steps to Get a Perfectly Written Assignment
One
Click “order this assignment now”
Two
Choose your deadline & pay for it
Three
Get custom-written work ready for submission

Custom-Written, AI & Plagiarism-Free with Passing "Guaranteed"

money back guarantee
Assignment Briefs 02-13-2023

Write a literature review for one of the following organisations: BD Network Spaghetti House ALLOCATE SOFTWARE LIMITED Wilderness Scotland Atom ICP Nurseries Samaritans

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Assessment

Literature Review

Assessment code:

010

Academic Year:

2022/2023

Trimester:

1

Module Title:

Undergraduate Major Project Integrated Case Study

Module Code:

MOD003463

Level:

6

Module Leader:

William Jefferies

Weighting:

20%

Word Limit:

2000

This excludes bibliography and other items listed in rule 6.75 of the Academic Regulations: http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf

Assessed Learning Outcomes

1-5

Submission Deadline:

Please refer to the deadline on the VLE

WRITING YOUR ASSIGNMENT:

  • This assignment must be completed individually.
  • You must use the Harvard referencing system.
  • Your work must indicate the number of words you have used.  Written assignments must not exceed the specified maximum number of words.  When a written assignment is marked, the excessive use of words beyond the word limit is reflected in the academic judgement of the piece of work which results in a lower mark being awarded for the piece of work (regulation 6.74).
  • Assignment submissions are to be made anonymously. Do not write your name anywhere on your work.
  • Write your student ID number at the top of every page.
  • Where the assignment comprises more than one task, all tasks must be submitted in a single document.
  • You must number all pages.

SUBMITTING YOUR ASSIGNMENT:

In order to achieve full marks, you must submit your work before the deadline. Work that is submitted late – if your work is submitted on the same day as the deadline by midnight, your mark will receive a 10% penalty. If you submit your work up to two working days after the published submission deadline – it will be accepted and marked.  However, the element of the module’s assessment to which the work contributes will be capped with a maximum mark of 40%.

Work cannot be submitted if the period of 2 working days after the deadline has passed (unless there is an approved extension). Failure to submit within the relevant period will mean that you have failed the assessment.

Requests for short-term extensions will only be considered in the case of illness or other cause considered valid by the Director of Studies Team. Please contact DoS@london.aru.ac.uk.  A request must normally be received and agreed by the Director of Studies Team in writing at least 24 hours prior to the deadline.  See rules 6.64-6.73: http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf

Exceptional Circumstances: The deadline for submission of mitigation in relation to this assignment is no later than five working days after the submission date of this work. Please contact the Director of Studies Team - DoS@london.aru.ac.uk. See rules 6.112 – 6.141: http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf

ASSIGNMENT QUESTION

Write a literature review for one of the following organisations:

The Literature Review must include the following sections

  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Presentation of data
  • Presentation of models and theories
  • Discussion
  • Reference list

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA and MARKS

To pass this assignment you must satisfactorily complete all elements of the literature review.

Research and investigation 40 marks

  • Develop a systematic approach to searching for literature/evidence
  • Use a search strategy effectively, including qualitative and quantitative data
  • Identify at least 20 appropriate sources to support your research

Analysis and use of models and theories 40 marks

  • Outline key findings from data
  • Analyse the data with models and theories from appropriate journal articles and monographs

Formatting and Referencing 20 marks

  • Situate your sources within the Hierarchy of Sources
  • Use Anglia Ruskin Harvard referencing correctly with relevant and appropriate sources

ARU GENERIC ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND MARKING STANDARDS: LEVEL 6 –

the Depth stage

Level 6 is characterised by an expectation of students’ increasing autonomy in relation to their study and developing skill sets. Students are expected to demonstrate problem solving skills, both theoretical and practical. This is supported by an understanding of appropriate theory; creativity of expression and thought based in individual judgement; and the ability to seek out, invoke, analyse and evaluate competing theories or methods of working in a critically constructive and open manner. Output is articulate, coherent and skilled in the appropriate medium, with some students producing original or

innovative work in their specialism.

 

Mark Bands

 

 

Outcome

Characteristics of Student Achievement by Marking Band for ARU’s Generic

Learning Outcomes (Academic Regulations, Section 2)

Knowledge &

Understanding

Intellectual (thinking), Practical, Affective and

Transferable Skills

 

 

90-

100%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Achieves module outcome(s)

Exceptional information base exploring and analysing the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with extraordinary originality and autonomy. Work may be considered for publication within

ARU

Exceptional management of learning resources, with a higher degree of autonomy/exploration that clearly exceeds the assessment brief. Exceptional structure/ accurate expression. Demonstrates intellectual originality and imagination. Exceptional team/practical/professional skills. Work may be considered for publication within ARU

 

80-

89%

Outstanding information base exploring and analysing the discipline, its theory and ethical issues with clear originality and autonomy

Outstanding management of learning resources, with a degree of autonomy/exploration that clearly exceeds the assessment brief. An exemplar of structured/accurate expression. Demonstrates intellectual originality and imagination. Outstanding team/practical/professional skills

 

70-

79%

Excellent knowledge base that supports analysis, evaluation and problem-solving in theory/ practice/ethics of discipline with

considerable originality

Excellent management of learning resources, with degree of autonomy/research that may exceed the assessment brief. Structured and creative expression. Excellent academic/ intellectual skills and practical/team/ professional/

problem-solving skills

 

60-

69%

Good knowledge base that supports analysis, evaluation and problem-solving in theory/ practice/ethics of discipline with

some originality

Good management of learning resources, with consistent self-directed research. Structured and accurate expression. Good academic/intellectual skills and team/practical/ professional/problem solving skills

 

50-

59%

 

Sound knowledge base that supports some analysis, evaluation and problem-solving in theory/practice/ethics of discipline

Sound management of learning resources. Some autonomy in research but inconsistent. Structured and mainly accurate expression. Sound level of academic/ intellectual skills going beyond description at times. Sound

team/practical/professional/problem-solving skills

 

 

40-

49%

 

A marginal pass in module outcome(s)

Adequate knowledge base with some omissions at the level of ethical/ theoretical issues.

Restricted ability to discuss theory and/or or solve problems in

discipline

Adequate use of learning resources with little autonomy. Some difficulties with academic/ intellectual skills. Some difficulty with structure/ accuracy in expression, but evidence of developing team/practical/professional/ problem-solving skills

 

 

30-

39%

A marginal fail in module outcome(s).

Satisfies default qualifying

mark

 

 

Limited knowledge base. Limited understanding of discipline/ethical issues. Difficulty with theory and problem solving in discipline

 

Limited use of learning resources. Unable to work autonomously. Little input to teams. Limited academic/ intellectual skills. Still mainly descriptive. General difficulty with structure/ accuracy in expression. Practical/ professional/problem-solving skills that are not yet secure

 

20-

29%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fails to achieve module outcome(s) Qualifying mark not satisfied

Little evidence of knowledge base. Little evidence of understanding of discipline/ ethical issues. Significant difficulty with theory and problem solving in

discipline

Little evidence of use of learning resources. Unable to work autonomously. Little input to teams. Little evidence of academic/ intellectual skills. Work significantly descriptive.

Significant difficulty with structure/accuracy in expression.

Little evidence of practical/professional/ problem-solving skills

 

10-

19%

Deficient knowledge base. Deficient understanding of discipline/ethical issues. Major difficulty with theory and problem solving in discipline

Deficient use of learning resources. Unable to work autonomously. Deficient input to teams. Deficient academic/intellectual skills. Work significantly descriptive. Major difficulty with structure/accuracy in expression.

Deficient practical/professional/problem-solving skills

 

1-

9%

No evidence of knowledge base; no evidence of understanding of discipline/ethical issues. Total inability with theory and problem solving in discipline

No evidence of use of learning resources. Completely unable to work autonomously. No evidence of input to teams. No evidence of academic/intellectual skills. Work wholly descriptive. Incoherent structure/accuracy and expression. No evidence of practical/professional/ problem-

solving skills

 

0%

Awarded for: (i) non-submission; (ii) dangerous practice and; (iii) in situations where the student

fails to address the assignment brief (eg: answers the wrong question) and/or related learning outcomes

 

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions

Our Giveaways

Plagiarism Report

for £20 Free

Formatting

for £12 Free

Title page

for £10 Free

Bibliography

for £18 Free

Outline

for £9 Free

Limitless Amendments

for £14 Free

Get all these features for
£83.00 FREE

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

Have a look at our samples which are written by our professional writers to give you an insight into how your work is going to look like. We have added some essays, coursework, assignments as well as dissertations.

View Our Samples

Jun Sat 2024

LO1 Appraise the use of high-performance

Higher Nationals Assignment Brief Qualification Title Pearson BT...

Jun Sat 2024

LO1 Produce a comparative analysis of th

Qualification Title   Unit Number and Title Un...

Jun Sat 2024

MSc Project in Computer Science

Welcome to the Best Writing Company for Your MSc Project in Computer Science An...