AC 1.1 Compare and contrast legal and equitable interests in land
LAW503: Land Law Assignment
|
Module Name |
LAW503: Land Law |
|
Assignment Name |
LAW503: Land Law Assignment |
|
Level |
Level 5 Diploma in Law |
|
Credits |
30 |
Plagiarism and Collusion
In submitting the assignment, Learners must complete a statement of authenticity confirming that the work submitted for all tasks is their own. The statement should also include the word count.
Plagiarism and collusion are treated very seriously. Plagiarism involves presenting another author`s work, excerpts, ideas, or passages without appropriate referencing and attribution.
Collusion occurs when two or more learners submit work that is so alike in ideas, content, wording, and/or structure that the similarity goes beyond what might have been mere coincidence.
Referencing
A professional approach to work is expected from all learners. Learners must therefore identify and acknowledge ALL sources/methodologies/applications used.
The learner must use an appropriate referencing system to achieve this. Marks are not awarded for the use of English; however, the learner must express ideas clearly and ensure that appropriate terminology is used to convey accuracy in meaning.
Please use the Harvard Style of Referencing throughout your work.
Appendices
You may include appendices to support your work. However, appendices must only contain additional supporting information and must be clearly referenced in your assignment.
You may also include tables, graphs, diagrams, Gantt charts, and flowcharts that support the main report and should be incorporated into the back of the submitted assignment report
Any published secondary information such as annual reports and company literature should be referenced in the main text of the assignment, following Harvard Style Referencing, and referenced at the end of the assignment.
Confidentiality
When Learners choose to include organisational information that deals with sensitive material or issues, they must seek advice and permission from that organisation about its inclusion.
Where confidentiality is an issue, Learners are advised to anonymise their assignment report so that it cannot be attributed to that particular organisation.
Word Count Policy
Learners must comply with the required word count within a margin of +10%. These rules exclude the index, headings, tables, images, footnotes, appendices, and information within references and bibliographies.
When an assessment task requires learners to produce presentation slides with supporting notes, the word count only applies to the supporting notes.
Marking and Grades
The details of a standard marking rubric can be found at the end of this document. Unless stated elsewhere, learners must answer all questions in this document.
Submission of Assignments
Before submitting your work check you have:
✓ Completed the tasks or activities as required by the assignment
✓ Labelled or numbered each task or activity
✓ Understood and responded to the command verbs in the Assessment Criteria
✓ Produced the tasks or activities in the required format
✓ Presented your work clearly
✓ Referenced sources you have used and cited from
✓ Put cited material in quotation marks
✓ Checked for any spelling or grammatical errors
✓ Added a footer with page number
Assignment Question
Assignment - Total word count - 2,000 words
You are working for a law firm and have been asked to prepare notes on the following matters in relation to land law.
Task 1- 1000 words
Grace owns a pig farm in Lincolnshire which she has been running with her brother Graham. On Graham’s death in 2005, the ownership of the farm passed to her but she found it too much for her to manage alone. She speaks to her son Karl and asks him to move back home to help with the farm. Karl is working in Birmingham in an accountancy firm with prospects of partnership. Grace tells Karl that the farm will be his one day so it is in his interest to help keep it going. Karl gives up his £60,000 a year job and prospects of partnership and moves back to the farm. He lives rent-free in the farmhouse with Grace and works on the farm for a minimal salary. Karl also upgrades the farm over the next few years using his own savings as Grace tells him she has left it solely to him in her will.
In May 2019, Grace leased some of the farm`s land to Katia to run a riding school and has granted Katia permission to ride across the remaining farmland. Grace agrees to sell Katia the freehold of the land for £300,000. Katia wants to negotiate a lower purchase price but says she will buy the land as long as she can obtain planning permission for a house and new buildings for the riding school.
Grace dies in early June and in her will leaves the entire estate to the National Trust. Explain the nature of interests in real property and advise Karl and Katia whether they can enforce the arrangements made with Grace. In the case of Katia this would include the sale of land and continuing lease and licence rights that may exist.
Your notes should:
- Compare and contrast legal and equitable interests in land. (AC1.1)
- Differentiate between personal and proprietary interests. (AC1.2)
- Explain different types of licences and ownership. (AC1.3)
- Explain the meaning of proprietary estoppel. (AC2.1)
- Analyse the conditions for its creation. (AC2.2)
- Examine available remedies. (AC2.3)
Task 2 - 1000 words
Saskia is the registered freehold owner of a large estate which includes the Manor House, which is her home, Rose Cottage which she has been leasing to Naseem for the last three years and East field which is being occupied by Terrence who runs a fishing club. She used to also own West field which she sold some years ago to Tina who gained planning permission to build on the land and now lives there.
a) Rose Cottage is set in its own garden. There are no easements. Saskia gave Naseem permission to keep his motorbike outside the garden of the property on Manor House land that is not part of the lease. After an argument, Saskia told Naseem that he is no longer allowed to park his bike on the land.
b) East Field has been occupied and developed by Terrence as a fishing centre since 2005. He has improved the riverbank, planted hedgerows and trees and has recently erected a small wooden lodge which he runs as a café and fishing supplies shop. He has started charging for entry to the field. Saskia owns the land and the fishing rights. Terrence has occupied the land for some years at no inconvenience to Saskia and she has allowed this. Her son has encouraged her to evict Terrence from the land.
c) WestField was sold two years ago to Tina for her to build a house. As part of the sale, Saskia made and registered a covenant that allowed Tina to erect one, single-story property on the land and use it for residential purposes only. Saskia covenanted that she would keep the dry stone wall between the Manor House garden and West Field in good repair. Now Tina has decided to build a second storey on her house and an extension to open a tearoom to which Saskia objects. In addition, Saskia has allowed the wall to fall into disrepair. If she can’t build, Tina is considering selling the property.
You are required to consider:
- Naseem’s right to park on the land outside the cottage garden
- Terrence’s rights to remain on the land and Saskia’s rights in relation to the land.
- The rights that exist to enforce the covenant in place relating to the West Field building and the boundary wall now and in the event of Tina selling the property.
Your notes should:
- Explain the rules for the creation and acquisition of legal and equitable easements. (AC3.1)
- Distinguish between negative and positive easements. (AC3.2)
- Explain how easements are extinguished. (AC3.3)
- Distinguish between positive and restrictive covenants. (AC4.1)
- Explain how the benefit and burden run in law and in equity. (AC4.2)
- Explain how freehold covenants are discharged or modified. (AC4.3)
- Explain how adverse possession is established. (AC5.1)
- Illustrate registered owners’ protection against adverse possession under the LRA 2002. (AC5.2)
- Illustrate the advantages of registered proprietors in the context of adverse possession. (AC5.3)
Marking Rubric:
|
|
Distinguished |
Excellent |
Good |
Proficient |
Basic |
Marginal |
Unacceptable |
|
Criteria |
80+ |
70 |
60 |
50 |
40 |
30 |
0 |
|
Content |
Extensive |
Comprehensive |
Adequate |
Describes |
Describes some of |
Largely |
Inadequate |
|
(alignment with |
evaluation and |
critical |
evaluation and |
main ideas |
the main ideas but |
incomplete |
information or |
|
assessment |
synthesis of |
evaluation and |
synthesis of key |
with evidence |
omits some |
description of |
containing |
|
criteria) |
ideas; includes |
synthesis of |
ideas beyond |
of evaluation; |
concepts; limited |
main issues; |
information not |
|
|
substantial |
ideas; includes |
basic |
includes |
evidence of |
misses key |
relevant to the |
|
|
original thinking |
coherent |
descriptions; |
some original |
evaluation; |
concepts; no |
topic |
|
|
|
original |
includes |
thinking |
confused original |
original |
|
|
|
|
thinking |
original |
|
thinking |
thinking |
|
|
|
|
|
thinking |
|
|
|
|
|
Application of |
In-depth, |
Clear and |
Appropriate |
Adequate |
Limited |
Confused |
Little or no |
|
Theory and |
detailed and |
relevant |
application of |
application of |
application of |
application of |
evidence of |
|
Literature |
relevant |
application of |
theory; |
theory; uses |
theory; refers to |
theory; does |
application of |
|
|
application of |
theory; fully |
integrates |
literature to |
literature but may |
not use |
theory and |
|
|
theory; expertly |
integrates |
literature to |
support ideas |
not use it |
literature for |
relevant |
|
|
integrates |
literature to |
support ideas |
and concepts |
consistently |
support |
literature |
|
|
literature to |
support ideas |
and concepts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
support ideas |
and concepts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and concept |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Knowledge and |
Extensive depth |
Comprehensive |
Sound |
Basic |
Limited and |
Confused or |
Little or no |
|
Understanding |
of understanding |
knowledge and |
understanding |
Knowledge |
superficial |
inadequate |
evidence of |
|
|
and exploration |
depth of |
of |
and |
knowledge and |
knowledge and |
knowledge or |
|
|
beyond key |
understanding |
principles and |
understandin |
understanding of |
understanding |
understanding of |
|
|
principles and |
key principles |
concepts |
g |
key concepts and |
of key |
key concepts and |
|
|
concepts |
and concepts |
|
of key |
principles |
concepts and |
principles |
|
|
|
|
|
concepts and |
|
principles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
principles |
|
|
|
|
Presentation and |
Logical, coherent |
Logical, |
Logical |
Orderly |
Somewhat weak |
Confused |
Illogical |
|
Writing Skills |
and polished |
coherent |
structure to |
presentation; |
presentation; |
presentation; |
presentation |
|
|
presentation |
presentation |
presentation; |
minor errors |
errors in |
errors in |
lacking cohesion; |
|
|
exceeding |
demonstrating |
makes few |
in mechanics |
mechanics and |
mechanics and |
contains |
|
|
expectations at |
mastery; free |
errors in |
and syntax |
syntax may |
syntax often |
significant errors |
|
|
this level; free |
from errors in |
mechanics and |
|
interfere with |
interfere with |
that interfere |
|
|
from errors in |
mechanics and |
syntax which |
|
meaning |
meaning |
with meaning |
|
|
mechanics and |
syntax |
do not prohibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
syntax |
|
meaning |
|
|
|
|
|
Referencing |
Advanced use of |
Mastery of |
Appropriate |
Adequate use |
Limited use of in- |
Inadequate use |
Little or no |
|
|
in- text citation |
in-text citation |
use of in-text |
of in- text |
text citation and |
of citation and |
evidence of |
|
|
and references |
and |
citation and |
citation and |
referencing |
referencing |
appropriate |
|
|
|
referencing |
referencing |
referencing |
|
|
referencing or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use of sources |
Directions:
Total the boxes and divide by 5 to arrive at the final mark. Example:
|
|
Distinguished |
Excellent |
Good |
Proficient |
Basic |
Marginal |
Unacceptable |
|
Range |
80-100 |
70-79 |
60-69 |
50-59 |
40-49 |
35-39 |
0-34 |
|
Criteria |
Score |
|
Content |
50 |
|
Application of Theory and Literature |
40 |
|
Knowledge and Understanding |
50 |
|
Presentation/Writing Skills |
40 |
|
Referencing |
40 |
|
Total Score |
220/5 = 44, Pass |
Example Answer
Compare and contrast legal and equitable interests in land
In this scenario, both Karl and Katia are dealing with claims to interests in real property, which can be broadly classified into legal and equitable interests. Understanding the distinction between these interests is crucial for determining whether they can enforce the arrangements made with Grace.
Legal Interests in Land
Legal interests are those that are recognised and enforceable under common law. They are the strongest form of interest in property, providing the holder with formal rights to use, control, or transfer the property. Legal interests must comply with specific formalities as required under the Law of Property Act 1925. These include interests such as:
- Freehold ownership
- Leasehold ownership (leases over 3 years must be in writing)
- Easements (rights of way or other rights over another`s land)
- Mortgages
Legal interests are binding on the world, meaning they automatically bind third parties (including purchasers) as long as they are registered or fall under the exceptions allowed under the Land Registration Act 2002.
Equitable Interests in Land
Equitable interests, on the other hand, are recognised under equity rather than common law. These arise in situations where formalities for a legal interest have not been met, but fairness dictates that some form of interest exists. Equitable interests include:
- Beneficial interests under a trust
- Restrictive covenants
- Estate contracts (agreements to sell land, for example)
- Proprietary estoppel claims
Equitable interests may be enforceable against third parties if those third parties had notice of the equitable interest. Unlike legal interests, they are generally not enforceable against someone who acquires the land in good faith, for value, and without notice of the equitable interest.
Continued....


