Order this Assignment Now: £129 VALID THRU: 17-Oct-2024
Assignment Briefs
09-23-2024
The implications of human and organisational attitudes towards risks and dangers have impacted the project
BSc Hons Occupational Safety, Health & Environment
Academic Session
Term 2 2024/25
Module
Management of Risk (OMED 1161)
QCF Level
6
Tutor
Assignment
1 of 2 (Report)
Pass Mark
40%
Assignment 1 Question
Your organisation just completed a huge pipeline project in the South of the country where you were the Health, Safety and Environment manager. In the project, where the new pipeline was installed for long-distance transportation of liquid and gas, the attitude of the employees towards risks and associated dangers remains poor. This is no different from the attitude of the Senior Management of the organisation. However, due to a recent letter from the health and safety regulatory authority where the organisation was warned and fined for a lot of incidents including accidents that show a poor safety culture, the shareholders board have asked you to produce a report on the safety culture at project and organisation level, using the recent about project as an example. In the report, they expect that you cover among many:
The implications of human and organisational attitudes towards risks and dangers have impacted the project
How a positive safety culture in the organisation can influence the implementation of harm reduction methods in the project and others.
How to improve the safety culture of the organisation and how to ensure that the assigned roles and responsibilities therein are not just a tick box exercise.
The connection between safety culture and good management.
In the shareholder board report, ensure that you discuss these broad categories and their application in the workplace and project. Feel free to make the relevant assumptions but they must be clearly started/outlined.
Your discussion should be in the form of a structured report of 1500 words with an executive summary, introduction, key headings, conclusion and recommendations. You will need to make reference to a broad range of published literature including guidance, standards and research. These sources must be referenced in your work using the Harvard system to support your discussion throughout
General Instruction
You should research a range of reference materials including recent published research relating to the topic you are discussing. Journal articles on research can be found through the portal in the e-library using science direct, for guidance on accessing journals and eBooks online please refer to the accessing electronic resources guide on Moodle. The work is to be word-processed, double or 1.5-line spacing Arial or Calibri, 12 Font, aligned to the left hand of the page and appropriately referenced using the Harvard system. A word count must be included, and the assignment should be within +/- 10% of the word limit.
Assessment Criteria
This assignment accounts for 50% of the module grade overall. The pass mark is 40%. The final grade for the module is an aggregate of the grades achieved for assignment 1 and 2. It is not necessary therefore to pass both assignments to pass the module overall. It will be assessed using the criteria below:
45% - Content
25% - Critical evaluation including recommendations
15% - Structure and presentation
15% - Referencing
Feedback
Written feedback is provided on Moodle along with your grade breakdown. Please ensure you pay close attention to your feedback and email your course tutor should you require any further clarification on the points raised.
Submission
All work must be submitted electronically through Moodle using the submission link provided. The submission date will usually be approximately 6 weeks after the study school. Work submitted late will not be marked unless a formal extension of time has been granted. Please contact your course tutor if you cannot make the submission date.
Plagiarism and Copying
Plagiarism is presenting someone else’s work or ideas as your own, with or without their consent, by incorporating it into your work without full acknowledgement. Plagiarism may be intentional or reckless, or unintentional. Under the University Regulations, intentional or reckless plagiarism is a disciplinary offence. We will ignore small matches associated with common phrases and terms and will ignore matches highlighted in your reference list when considering whether your work is plagiarised.
The Turnitin system in Moodle provides a similarity check for all work that is submitted. As a rule, you should aim to get your similarity score into the “green” zone on the Turnitin submission system. If you are in the “amber” zone you will need to look very carefully at your work to see what you can put into your own words to reduce your score. High amber scores may be referred to the plagiarism panel and will certainly mean that a significant part of your work will not be considered in the marking. If you are in the “red” zone you will be referred to the plagiarism panel. We strongly advise you to submit a final draft through Turnitin well before the cut-off date to check your similarity score. Please remember that you are only allowed to submit one draft version of your work every day so leave yourself plenty of time to revise and resubmit your final version of your assignment.
Example Answer:
Report on Safety Culture: Implications and Improvements for [Organisation Name]
Executive Summary
This report examines the safety culture within [Organisation Name] following a significant pipeline project in the South of the country. It evaluates the implications of current human and organisational attitudes towards risks, highlights the influence of a positive safety culture on harm reduction strategies, and proposes methods for improving safety culture and accountability. Drawing on recent regulatory warnings and the project`s outcomes, this report underscores the importance of integrating safety culture with effective management practices to foster a safer working environment.
Introduction
The recent completion of a pipeline project for the long-distance transportation of liquid and gas has highlighted critical issues regarding the safety culture within [Organisation Name]. Despite regulatory warnings and financial penalties due to a series of incidents, the attitudes of employees and senior management towards safety remain concerningly lax. This report aims to explore the implications of these attitudes, the benefits of fostering a positive safety culture, and actionable recommendations to enhance safety practices across the organisation.
1. Implications of Human and Organisational Attitudes Towards Risks
1.1 Current Attitudes and Their Impact
The poor attitude towards safety exhibited by both employees and senior management has had profound implications for the recent pipeline project. High-risk environments demand a robust safety culture; however, a culture that normalises risk-taking and minimises the importance of safety protocols can lead to catastrophic outcomes. Research indicates that attitudes towards risk are often shaped by management behaviour (HSE, 2022), and the lack of commitment from leadership has trickled down to employees.
1.2 Case Study: Recent Pipeline Project
During the pipeline project, incidents of near misses and safety breaches were recorded. The absence of a proactive safety culture resulted in inadequate risk assessments and insufficient training on safety protocols. The regulatory authority`s findings indicated a failure to implement necessary harm reduction measures, leading to injuries and increased operational costs (Smith et al., 2023).
2. The Role of Positive Safety Culture in Harm Reduction
2.1 Defining Safety Culture
Safety culture refers to the shared beliefs, practices, and attitudes regarding safety within an organisation (Cooper, 2021). A positive safety culture encourages employees to prioritise safety, report hazards, and participate in safety training actively.
2.2 Influence on Harm Reduction Methods
Implementing a positive safety culture can significantly enhance the effectiveness of harm reduction strategies. Employees who feel valued and empowered are more likely to adhere to safety protocols and engage in behaviours that mitigate risks (Mearns & Flin, 2022). For instance, initiatives such as regular safety briefings, feedback mechanisms, and recognition of safe practices can cultivate an environment of safety consciousness.
Continued....
Order this Assignment Now:£129
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions