Order this Assignment Now: £179 VALID THRU: 30-May-2025
Assignment Briefs
04-23-2025
1.1 Identify 2 models of reflection commonly used in health and social care practice.
F-505-9519 Reflective Practice
Centre Name
UK Professional Development Academy
Qualification
Qualifi – Level 4 Diploma in Health and Social Care
Unit number and title
F-505-9519 Reflective Practice
Learner Name
Submission Date
Word Count
3500 words
Required Formatting
Use Calibri (Body) Font Style, Size 11 for Text, Size 13 (Bold) for Headings, 12 (Bold) for Subheadings.
Plagiarised Content Information
Focus on creating authentic work that reflects your own understanding and research.
AI Content Information
Must be entirely self-written, with no AI-generated content used.
In-text citation requirement
Must incorporate in-text citations with each criterion and incorporate references to those citations in the bibliography section.
Assignment Grading Information
Submit assignment by the due date set by tutors. Early submissions will be graded within seven to ten working days after the due date.
Assignment title
Reflective Practice
Assessment requirements:
To achieve a ‘pass’ for this unit, learners must provide evidence to demonstrate that they have fulfilled all the learning outcomes and meet the standards specified by all assessment criteria.
You will be directly assessed by a qualified assessor if nesseary.
Unit Aim
This unit is designed to introduce the learner to reflective practice in all its forms. Reflections on practice and in practice are important concepts in health and social care and feed into the idea of self -development linking theory to practice.
Learning Outcomes
On completion of this assignment learners should:
LO1 Identify and explain models of reflection used in health and social care.
LO2 Develop the skills and knowledge required to plan for your personal and professional development.
LO3 Produce a personal development plan identifying how you will develop the skills and knowledge required as a learner/practitioner of health and social Care.
LO4 Discuss the links between theory and practice and how this can be facilitated.
Please refer to the last pages of this document for detailed guidance to meet the requirements of the assignment.
Helping Notes are present in the Assignment worksheet that will aid you with your assignment. Moreover, you can summon tutor support.
Introduction:
(Provide a brief introduction of the assignment)
Task 1:
1.1 Identify 2 models of reflection commonly used in health and social care practice.
1.2 Explain the benefits of reflective practice in health and social care.
Task 2:
2.1 Demonstrate an understanding of the use of personal development plans.
2.2 Discuss how personal development plans are used in health and social care practice.
2.3 Explain the role of clinical supervision in health and social care
Task 3:
3.1 Develop a personal development plan.
3.2 Identify on the plan your aims, how to achieve, success criteria and how you will monitor if achieved.
Task 4:
4.1 Discuss how to facilitate the use of research in practice and its benefits.
4.2 Discuss the potential barriers to the implementation of research in practice.
Conclusion:
(Provide a brief conclusion of the assignment)
Suggested resources:
Lishman, J. (2007) Handbook for practice learning in social work and social care: knowledge and theory. London: Jessica Kingsley
Bolton, G. E. J. Reflective Practice, Writing and Development (Sage, 2014) ISBN: 9781446282359
Moon, J. Learning Journals: A Handbook for Reflective Practice and Professional Development (Routledge 2006) ISBN: 9780415403757
Collins, S. Supervision Skills (SPC Publishing UK, 2015) ISBN: 9780993169007
Johns, C (2013) Becoming A Reflective Practitioner (4th Ed) Wiley- Blackwell
Boud, D., Keogh, R and Walker, D. (ed) (1985) Reflection: turning Experience into Learning.
Community Care Mental
Health Practice Nursing Times
Guidelines for completion and Submission
Plagiarism and Collusion
In submitting the assignment Learner’s must complete a statement of authenticity confirming that
the work submitted for all tasks is their own. The statement should also include the word count. UKPDA recommends the following to check plagiarism/similarity. https://www.grammarly.com/plagiarism-checker
https://www.scanmyessay.com
Learners are required to attach the similarity report in submission slot or email to tutor. Plagiarism and collusion are treated very seriously. Plagiarism involves presenting work, excerpts, ideas or passages of another author without appropriate referencing and attribution.
Collusion occurs when two or more learners submit work which is so alike in ideas, content, wording and/or structure that the similarity goes beyond what might have been mere coincidence.
Referencing
A professional approach to work is expected from all learners. Learners must therefore identify and acknowledge ALL sources/methodologies/applications used.
The learner must use Harvard Referencing system to achieve this. Marks are not awarded for the use of English; however, the learner must express ideas clearly and ensure that appropriate terminology is used to convey accuracy in meaning.
Appendices
You may include appendices to support your work, however appendices must only contain additional supporting information, and must be clearly referenced in your assignment.
You may also include tables, graphs, diagrams, Gantt chart and flowcharts that support the main report should be incorporated into the end of the assignment report that is submitted.
Any published secondary information such as annual reports and company literature, should be referenced in the main text of the assignment, in accordance of Harvard Style Referencing, and referenced at the end of the assignment.
Word Count Policy
Learners must comply with the required word count, within a margin of ±10%. These rules exclude the index, headings, tables, images, footnotes, appendices and information contained within references and bibliographies. When an assessment task requires learners to produce presentation slides with supporting notes, the word count applies to the supporting notes only.
Submission of Assignments
All work to be submitted on the due date. All work must be submitted in a single electronic document (.docx file)
Key Terminologies
Describe
To describe means to create a picture with words but not simply writing a list of bullet points.
Explain
To explain something, you will need to provide a clear account of your understanding, including details like why and how.
Analyse
To analyse something, you consider it carefully and in detail in order to understand or explain it.
To analyse, identify the main parts or ideas of a subject and examine or interpret the connections between them.
Evaluate
To evaluate, decide on your subject’s significance, value, or quality after carefully studying its good and bad features.
Use authoritative (eg, from established authors or theorists in the field) and, to some extent, personal appraisal of both contributions and limitations of the subject. Similar to assess.
Discuss
To discuss in an essay, consider your subject from different points of view. Examine, analyse and present considerations for and against the problem or statement.
Critically
Often used in conjunction with other directive words, such as critically discuss, critically examine or critically analyse. It does not mean criticise. It is asking you to give a balanced answer that points out mistakes or weaknesses and any favourable aspects of the subject of the question. The decision or overall judgment you make must be supported with evidence from reliable sources.
Points to consider
Explanation
1. In-text Citations and References
In-text citations and references are the fundamental requirements of the assignment. Must incorporate in-text citations with each criterion and incorporate references to those citations in the bibliography section. Make sure that all in-text citations and references are in the proper Harvard style. This includes correct formatting, author names, publication dates, and page numbers. Accurate citations reflect academic integrity and adherence to scholarly standards. Additionally, avoid utilising blogs or websites like Wikipedia, indeed, etc. for the content. Utilise peer- reviewed articles, journals and books to enhance the effectiveness of your content.
2. Relevancy of Content
Align the content with each assignment criterion. Focus on the action verbs (e.g., assess, evaluate, identify, describe, demonstrate, explain) mentioned in the criteria and modify your responses accordingly.
Irrelevant content will lead to a loss of marks and possible failure.
3. Paragraph Form and Suitable Headings
Avoid using unnecessary bullet points and short sentences. Instead, address each criterion in a well-structured paragraph with appropriate headings. This ensures clarity and coherence in your writing, making it easier for evaluators to follow your argument. Make sure that each criterion is clearly presented with proper formatting, including headings, paragraphs, and consistent style throughout.
4. Comprehensive Coverage of Criteria according to Assignment brief
Address all the criteria listed in the assignment brief. Missing any criterion could result in not achieving a passing grade. Make sure your response fully addresses and gives appropriate consideration to each criterion. Additionally, follow the additional guidelines or scenarios (if given) in the brief to stay relevant to the demand of the criteria.
5. Word Count Adherence
Strictly follow the word count policy mentioned in the assignment brief.
Falling short of the required word count can lead to failure. Plan your response to meet the word count while maintaining quality.
6. Avoid Using AI- Generated Content
Refrain from relying on AI-generated content for your assignments. Such content lack depth, originality, and relevance, and could lead to academic integrity issues. Focus on creating authentic work that reflects your own understanding and research.
7. Authentic Work Submission
Ensure that any work submitted for assessment is genuinely your own.
Submitting jointly written work as your own is considered academic misconduct, which can lead to penalties.
8. Avoid using someone else work
Using someone else`s work whether copied word-for-word or slightly rephrased without giving proper credit is plagiarism.
9. Duplication/self- plagiarism
Submitting work that largely repeats material previously graded for the same or another course, here or elsewhere, counts as self-plagiarism, unless it’s an improved version approved for reassessment. This is considered academic misconduct.
10. Material proofreading
Use Microsoft Word`s grammar and spell check, the use of Grammarly is strictly prohibited due to its AI text-generation capabilities
Suggested Guidelines for Improved Assignment Content
Points to consider
Explanation
Case Studies and Visual Aids
Incorporate relevant case studies, smart art, and figures to enhance the effectiveness of your content. This incorporation can make complex information more engaging, potentially earning you extra marks.
Updated and Peer-Reviewed Sources
Refer to updated (2018 and onwards) peer-reviewed articles, journals, and books. Using recent and credible sources strengthens your arguments and demonstrates your awareness of current developments in your field.
Assignment Formatting
Follow the assignment formatting guidelines as mentioned in the assignment brief. Proper formatting is important for a professional presentation and can impact the overall grade. Must include the assessment criteria statement before starting the response to that criterion for better clarity.
Order this Assignment Now:£179
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions