Order this Assignment Now: £179 VALID THRU: 22-Nov-2025
Units Only
10-15-2025
CMI Unit 701 Strategic Leadership
What is Unit 701 Strategic Leadership (CMI Level 7) All About?
Unit 701 Strategic Leadership expects senior managers to think and act like board-level leaders, turning insight into direction and direction into delivery. Your assessment should read like a board paper: a tight narrative that links context, chosen strategy and implementation roadmap, with clear risks, resources, milestones and success metrics. Cite credible data, show why rejected options were set aside, and demonstrate how the plan protects reputation while improving organisational performance. This blend of analysis, governance and people-centric execution is what distinguishes Level 7 strategic leadership.
Purpose and scope: Shape a clear, evidence-based vision, convert it into strategic objectives and an operating model, and set governance for risk, ethics, sustainability and long-term value for stakeholders.
Analysis to decision: Diagnose the external and internal context (PESTLE, Five Forces, value chain), develop and compare strategic options with quantified impacts (KPIs, NPV/ROI, scenario analysis), then prioritise a portfolio and funding route.
Leading change: Build the case for change, align culture, capabilities and structure, negotiate stakeholder buy-in, and establish measurement, assurance and feedback loops for continuous improvement and resilience.
You Landed at the Right Place for Unit 701 Assignment Assistance
We map your submission to Unit 701 assessment criteria (LOs) with a board-style executive summary, a context diagnosis that uses only what fits your sector, an options long-list → short-list with a weighted decision matrix, and an implementation plan with KPIs, risks, governance and ethics, so every section earns marks, not word-count.
Your Voice, Not a Template
Give us a two-minute voice note answering five plain questions about your role and problem. We mirror your tone and examples, so the assignment reads like you, not “if someone else has written”.
Proper Citations and References for Evidence
Every key claim sits on a one-page “proof sheet”: fresh UK sources with dates and one-line why they matter. No waffle, no mystery, just links you can stand behind. Read are terms and conditions here.
Useful on Monday Morning
We end with a short action list for your workplace, what to do, who owns it, and how you’ll tell it worked. It’s more than a pass; it’s something you can actually use.
Why Choose Us?
The top-notch reasons to choose us:
Written from scratch, no templates.
Six-line plan upfront, mirrors your brief.
Live linkboard, UK sources you can see.
Plain English, your voice kept; mini glossary.
Figure-first, tables/diagrams all prepared by us.
Verified AI and Turnitin Reports for Free
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Real Sample Answers of Strategic Leadership Assignment
Task 1 – The Role and Context for Strategic Leadership
Introduction
Strategic leadership is important for directing an organisation towards the achievement of its vision and mission. Organisational context significantly impacts the elements of a strategic leader, which are purpose, structure, culture, and the external environment. This report also critically evaluates the effect of organisational context on strategic leadership and the purpose of strategic leaders in the achievement of organisational objectives. To illustrate these dynamics, the Tata Group, an Indian multinational business conglomerate, is employed.
Influence of Organisational Environment on Strategic Leadership
Organisational Context
Mission and Strategic Direction
The strategic intent of Tata Group aims to generate societal value besides attaining a competitive advantage in the industry. It focuses on strategic development, sustainable operations, and the well-being of the societies in which it operates (Nair et al., 2022). But achieving all these priorities can be a daunting task especially within really competitive global environments where normally short-term financial performance demands oppose social challenges that take long-term solutions.
Strategic Narrative and Historical Perspective
The Tata Group was established in 1868 by Jamsetji Tata, and his vision guides this organisation’s cultural characteristics. Accounting policies and management practices are aligned with the narratives of ethical leadership and organisational resilience together with community service (Kapoor, 2024). For instance, Ratan Tata’s choice to integrate affordability as a key factor when entering the market with Tata Nano demonstrate the usage of leadership approach oriented to society needs. But when it comes to sustaining this narrative across various Global Markets, this could be challenging as the leaders have to export these values into different cultural contexts without compromising the ethical core of the organisation.
Governance and Legal Status
The governance structure of Tata Group answers to its private ownership but serves the public interest. A portion of its profits is dedicated to charitable causes through the Tata Trusts (Tiwari et al., 2024). However, leaders have to manage these philanthropic initiatives alongside their obligations to shareholders.
Implications in Strategic Direction
Organising Structure and Strategic Management
Tata Group’s decentralised structure enables business units to run independently while maintaining organisational goals. This fosters innovation and preparedness but can cause erratic strategic alignment, particularly across different sectors (Jayarama, 2023). Strategic leadership therefore requires both decentralisation as well as integration so that the organisation benefits from both flexibility and cohesiveness.
Culture and Ethics
The principles of trust and integrity inherent to Tata influence the company’s practices of innovation and leadership. For instance, Ratan Tata during Tata Nano launch focused more on ethics and affordability to meet societal requirements (Rath and Padhi, 2023). However, maintaining these values globally across a large population can at times be a challenge, particularly where global markets are competitive. Leaders have the responsibility to constantly remind their employees about the ethical framework embedded in the organisation while at the same time making adjustments to local environments.
Stakeholder Expectations
Some of the stakeholders in Tata are its employees, consumers, investors and the societies. Managers at Tata like the ones at TCS manage to meet the needs and wants of its stakeholders leading it growing the reputation of trust and global leadership (Jayarama, 2023). However, meeting multiple demands may involve compromises, for example, between profit and environmental conservation. For instance, when organisational leaders prioritise environmentalism for its ability to increase long-term business sustainability, it results in higher short-term expenses, which presents a dilemma for managers in their quest to meet shareholders’ needs.
Change and Innovation
A proactive approach to change is seen in Tata Motors implementing electric mobility in the organisation and its overall innovation strategy (Nair et al., 2022). While this demonstrates firm flexibility, there may be cases of internal opposition or resource issues that necessitates the leaders to guide innovation towards being ethical and sustainable. Leaders need to overcome these challenges by establishing a clear vision and coordinating the effort towards bringing about change and innovation that must be compatible with the organisational ethical standards and strategic plans.
Leadership Accountability
The corporate structure of Tata enables subsidiary CEOs to manage their entities autonomously, while maintaining a coherent structure that fosters innovation and synergy (Tiwari et al., 2024). However, this autonomy leads to decentralised decision-making, therefore, the need to have strong accountability structures that enhance a sense of unity of purpose without killing innovation. To counter this, Tata Group has set up checks and balances to guarantee that specific operational structures remain unaffiliated but also committed to social responsibility and the organisation’s general vision (Tiwari et al., 2024). Managers, therefore, need to find ways of promoting decentralisation to allow creativity to thrive while at the same time keeping central control to guarantee convergence, a common vision, and ethical standards throughout the conglomerate.
Organisational Purpose, Vision, Mission, Culture, and Values
Strategic leaders play a significant role in the definition of an organisation’s direction, development of vision and mission, as well as the support of organisational culture based on values. strategic leadership transcends task execution by providing stakeholders, including employees and customers, with a motivational framework that aligns with organisational goals (Allen, 2016). Uhl-Bien, and Arena (2018) state that strategic leadership involves not only undertaking specific tasks but also providing a motivational reason for stakeholders, such as employees and customers. For instance, the Tata Group was able to shape organisational purpose through leadership by implementing customer centricity and innovation, as seen through the launch of the Tata Nano car model (Sampath Boopathi and Sandeep Kautish, 2024).
This strategic move of coming up with an inexpensive car for the common person was grounded in the corporate culture, which treasured the aspects of functional and moral imperative. However, there were some issues regarding the sustainability of the initiative, which proves that the process of creating an organisational value system consistent with values-oriented market demands and organisational essentials is indeed challenging (Nath et al., 2021).
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
FAQs
Can you help me choose a suitable organisation or case?
Yes, real employer (with anonymisation) or a defensible case study. We check data access, stakeholder availability and risk before you commit.
What structure works best for Unit 701 Stategic Leadership?
Brief-dependent, but a proven flow is: executive context → strategic diagnosis → options and evaluation → chosen strategy → implementation plan → risk/benefits → reflection and CPD.
Which strategic tools are acceptable for 701?
Use tools that lead to decisions: PESTLE, Five Forces, stakeholder salience, VRIO, risk register, cost/benefit or weighted criteria for options.
Do you supply current UK sources and Harvard referencing?
Yes, recent, credible UK sources (e.g., regulators/ONS/industry reports) with “Cite Them Right” Harvard formatting for text, figures and tables.
Can you support the reflective component?
We help you by providing reflection (e.g., Gibbs/Driscoll) that links lessons to a practical CPD action with a measurable outcome.
How quickly can you help with Unit 701?
Usually it takes around 48–72h, but depending on the urgency, we can write it in less than 24 hours too. The premium pricing will apply.
Do you guarantee a pass or distinction?
We focus on meeting ACs, evidence quality and clear decision-making, what markers actually assess, and then write everything required, make sure you get a pass.
Order this Assignment Now:£179
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions