You have been asked to present a report on the business rationale for Coaching and Mentoring, within either your organisation or one that you are proposing to work in, to the Senior Management Team (SMT)

Centre Number:

Centre Name:

Learner Registration No:

Learner Name:

 Submission Cover Sheet

A cover sheet must be presented with every assignment with confirmation of authenticity stated and permission granted (or otherwise) for the centre and/or ILM to use the script.

Statement of authenticity

In making this submission, I certify that this work is my own and has not, in whole or part, been knowingly presented elsewhere for assessment, unless identified as a relevant part of a previous assessment. Where materials have been used from other sources they have been appropriately refenced and/or acknowledged.

Attention is drawn to the plagiarism policies of both the centre and the ILM. Plagiarism can result in a learner being withdrawn from a qualification.

Permission for ILM to use this script

ILM occasionally use anonymised learners’ submissions, for assessment standardisation. By submitting I agree that the script can be used on this basis.

If you do not want your script to possibly be used, please tick the box:

Section 1

The opening section of your report demonstrates your ability to be able to apply knowledge and understanding of best practice to your current context.

Introduction

As an introduction to the report, briefly outline below the situation in which you either work or intend to work, as a Coach or Mentor.

1.1. Starting with definitions to base your evidence on for both coaching and mentoring, explain both their similarities and differences. You must provide a minimum of two similarities and two differences.

Essentially both coaching and mentoring are used to enhance an individual’s skills, draw out knowledge that they already have, and intern should help improve their work performance (reference).  To support this assignment and explain the differences and similarities it is important to first define both.

Rogers (2016) defines coaching as ‘Coaching is the art of facilitating another person’s learning, development, wellbeing, and performance. It raises self- awareness and through coaching find their own solutions’. 

 Mentoring can be defined more as an experience person who can support give advice drawing from their own experiences and wisdom.  ( Reference).

You will already see that drawing a distinction between coaching and mentoring is not simple. Clutterbuck (2008) highlights the features that they seem to have in common; both:

• require, and draw upon, the helper’s experience
• involve giving advice in some form
• coaching and mentoring are based on goals set by, or for, the learner
• methods deal with significant transitions the learner wishes to make
• deal with personal growth ambitions.
• Both use the provider`s questioning, listening and feedback skills
• Both involve meaningful dialogue aimed at unlocking the mentee`s potential and raising their performance

Mentoring tends to describe the relationship in which a more experienced colleague shares their greater knowledge to support the development of those who are inexperienced in their role. One thing that differentiates mentoring from coaching is the timescale. Mentoring relationships tend to be longer term. With a mentor, you’re getting someone who’s already walked in your shoes. They are experienced in your field and can help fast-track you along your growth path. They can offer guidance and support, and there is usually a level of personal connection. They can save you from having to go through a steep learning curve and making unnecessary mistakes by using their hindsight to provide you with foresight.

The objective of coaching typically has emphasis on producing performance and improvement at work. It focuses on specific skills and goals, although it may also have an impact on an individual’s personal attributes such as social interaction or confidence. The process typically lasts for a defined period of time.1 A coach takes a slightly different approach. He or she serves as an expert guiding you in a very specific area of performance such as marketing, financial support, sales, business growth, social media etc.

Both support a person`s development. Both are based on 1-1 relationships. Both work best when there is good personal rapport between the two parties. Both typically involve a series of meetings, over several months.

One of the differences between being a coach and being a mentor is a coach focused in developing someone skills themselves,  where as mentors share more of their own knowledge and experience to help the mentee develop (reference) both use the provider`s questioning, listening and feedback skills.

1.2. Provide an evaluation of how the organisational context affects coaching or mentoring, include at least three of these for either coaching or mentoring.

In summary, your role as an organizational coach is to: Facilitate change and guide both individuals and teams toward strategic goals. Identify improvement areas, set goals, and create actionable plans. Bridges gaps between management and employees, fostering open communication and a collaborative work culture

Within any organisation there are many factors that can affect how coaching is implemented, encouraged, embedded and the results of any such intervention, support or guidance

1.3. Present the business rationale for either coaching or mentoring, including at least two benefits to individuals and at least two benefits to organisations.

organizations:

Individual

1.4. Make an assessment of how the impact of coaching and mentoring will be measured for both individuals and the organisation.  Include at least one example of a measure for individuals and one example of a measure for the organisation

The GROW Model:

1.5. Lookig ahead, identify at least two potential individual barriers and at least two potential organisational barriers to coaching or mentoring and develop strategies to overcome or minimise each of these potential barriers.

Section 2

In the second section of your report, create a ‘fit for purpose’ training proposal that will support individuals in their development as an effective coach or mentor. This proposal may be based on the theoretical aspects required for aspiring coaches or mentors.

2.1. Review the required knowledge and skills and behaviours for future course content, in order for each individual to become an effective coach or mentor. Provide one referenced example for each of knowledge and skills and behaviours to support the review.

• Knowledge, skills, and behaviours, including attitudes, beliefs, and values.
• Theories about the relevant knowledge, skills, and behaviours needed to be an effective coach or mentor.
• Models of coaching competencies from professional bodies or recognized texts and research (e.g., AC, ICF, EMCC).
• Learning styles and preferences and their impact on coaching or mentoring.
• Diagnostic and other tools/techniques to support learning and performance (e.g., Myers-Briggs, 180º Feedback, 360º Feedback, Emotional Intelligence, Competency Measures).
• Giving and receiving feedback.
• The source and potential impact of personal beliefs and values on the coaching or mentoring process.
• The importance of general self-awareness for coaches or mentors.
• Transactional Analysis.

they have the ability to build up and wind down relationships with a wide range of clients, to create working alliances that create the possibility of coaching. It helps to be clear, unambiguous and consistent, and to be able to tolerate a wide range of feelings, both within oneself and in others.

There are many skills needed to be an effective coach. Whilst this is not an exhaustive list, it is intended to outline the ones I feel are the most necessary in order to be effective in the role. One of the most vital skills for a coach to develop is the art of active listening. It is imperative that a coach recognises their role is not simply to talk or to ‘instruct’ their coachee. Much can be learnt about a person’s thought processes and their real issues if time is given over to simply listening with an active ear and focusing on the elements of the conversation that the coachee is sharing. Using focused questioning and appropriate challenge can then allow a coachee to explore their ideas and rationalise the issue they are trying to unpick.

However, it is important to recognise the value of building rapport with the person you are coaching, to ensure that trust and openness are treated with respect. This allows a culture of enquiry, space and emotional intelligence to foster. Strong communication skills are vital in any interaction when undertaking coaching and mentoring.

Knowledge:

Another aspect of effective coaching is that the coach has credibility and knowledge to be able to support the coachee seeking support. This knowledge is particularly important as it establishes that there is validity, credibility and understanding of the various models, tools and techniques used in coaching. Experience in coaching also provides a wider perspective and ensures that strong codes of practice and ethics are in place and adhered to. It is vital that robust contracts, outlining the codes expected, the hierarchy of the relationship and a strong agreement of the aim of the programme and sessions is in place. One other aspect of knowledge which the coach needs to be aware of is their own honest reflection of themselves as a coach and any bias, personal values and perceptions that they may bring to the session. Coaches themselves need to recognise and adapt within their own limitations and have knowledge of themselves as a practitioner.

Behaviour:

Being self-reflective is a critical element of effective coaching and the coach needs to reflect strongly on their own behaviours ensuring they are fostering an environment of patience, respect and empathy. It is important that coaches acknowledge both their own achievements in developing these skills but also foster an ethos of celebration and acknowledgement of the learning path the coachee has been on. The coach must recognise that time, and allowing elements to unfold in a safe environment, are critical elements of their role. Recognising emotion and its effect and acknowledging the safety of being able to do that, are important elements of behaviour for a coach. Coaches need to recognise they must hold themselves to account for their professionalism and discretion and enact high standards of confidentiality, integrity and accountability.

2.2. Communication skills are an essential part of the coaching and mentoring role, in order for the coach or mentor to be effective, conduct an analysis of the required communication skills, including at least four skills.

• Communication skills such as non-verbal communication, use of silence, types of questioning, listening, and giving feedback.
• Social and interpersonal skills, including remaining ethical and non-judgmental.
• Communication theories like Discourse Analysis and Sociolinguistics.

2.3. The report should include a review of the responsibilities of the coach or mentor to manage effective relationships in order to inform the job and role description of the coach or mentor. The report should also include how the coach or mentor remains ethical and non-judgmental.

• The importance of trust, remaining non-judgmental, empathy, and support in building and maintaining effective coaching or mentoring relationships.
• Legal and ethical considerations for effective relationship management.
• Confidentiality, in accordance with current legislation.

The mentorship and coaching programs should base on organizational ethics. The management and the human resource department should ensure that the mentors or the coaches engaged during the program are well conversant with the organization’s ethics so that their activities will satisfy the organization’s ethics (Kocabas & Yirci, 2011). When the implementation includes the company’s ethics, the employees will feel safeguarded and secure through the mentoring and coaching process.

2.4. Select and review a coaching or mentoring model that can be followed within an organisational context.

• A model for effective coaching and mentoring, such as GROW or OSCAR.
• A thorough, accurate, and appropriate review of a model or process used for formal coaching or mentoring within an organization.
• The essential features of the model are clearly outlined.
• The review is based on appropriate recognized sources.
• Conclusions and/or recommendations are drawn based on the review conducted.

The organization should analyze the systems to have a goal-oriented implementation of coaching and mentorship program (Hall et al. 2011). The managers and the human resource department should conduct examinations for the organization to help in aligning the programs with objectives and goals.

A motivation-based approach should be included to recognize the employee motivation to align the implementation program with the relevant objective. The programs help fill the gap between the top workers and management and the employees. Mentors should take the responsibility to motivate their junior employees and be role models to other staff.

For a mentorship program to be effectively implemented, the organization should include juniors and mentors to sign agreements (Hall et al. 2011). The agreement, however, should be designed to accommodate the employees’ weaknesses and strengths and reflect the organization’s objectives.

Agreement implementation policy

Once the organization has defined an implementation agreement, the implementation committee should follow the agreement when executing the contract. The adherence to the policy agreement will enhance the satisfaction of all the parties involved.

2.5. Provide a justification for reflective practice and individual and peer and group supervision as part of the ongoing professional development requirements of the coaches or mentors to ensure competent practice

•  sufficient, correct, and appropriate justification of the importance of reflective practice and individual, peer, and group supervision for an effective coach or mentor.
• A rationale supporting the justification is presented.
• Reflective practice and individual, peer, and group supervision are considered in the justification.

Your answer should cover the following in detail:

• Self-evaluation for the coach, including acting on feedback from clients, peers, tutors, and supervisors.
• Reflection in action and reflection on action.
• The rationale for the need and benefit of reflective practice as a coach or mentor.
• The rationale for individual, group, and peer supervision of coaches or mentors in practice.

Section 3

In order to provide a pool of established coaches and mentors within the organisation, prepare the necessary guidance and documentation that will be used as part of the contracting process and ensure a consistent approach across the organisation.

3.1. Analyse the reasons for and the characteristics of an effective contracting process. Reference must be made to a membership body’s code of practice to inform the analysis.

Contracting is about protecting yourself, but also it allows the coachee, to understand what coaching is and what`s actually going to happen in the coaching room, your expectations of them, what they can expect from you and just how the coaching is going to run.

AC 3.1 Analyse the reasons for and the characteristics of effective contracting in coaching or mentoring.

To pass this question, make sure your answer includes:

• A good, accurate, and suitable analysis of effective contracting within coaching or mentoring.
• Analysing a variety of characteristics of effective contracting within coaching or mentoring.
• Making the essential features of the reasons and characteristics of effective contracting clear.
• Including a reference to a code of practice from a coaching or membership body in the analysis.

Your answer should cover the following in detail:

• Characteristics of effective contracting, such as the physical environment, confidentiality, boundaries, stakeholder involvement (like two-way and three-way contracting), contracts, timescales, and frequency.
• Links to membership body codes of practice.
• Goal setting when contracting.
• Knowing when not to contract and how to handle situations where contracting is not appropriate, like conflicts of interest or lack of commitment.

3.2. Provide an explanation of how to manage the coaching or mentoring process and include the main stages of the process, from initial contracting to final evaluation.

• clear explanation of how to manage the coaching or mentoring process within an organisation.
• Including the main stages of the process.

Your answer should cover the following in detail:

• Managing the process continuously, including ongoing coaching or mentoring, mid-way reviews, evaluation, and conclusion.
• Reviewing any selected model or process within the organisation.